Abstract
The content of this chapter is based on the following works: [1] D. Rotondo, F. Nejjari, V. Puig. A virtual actuator and sensor approach for fault tolerant control of LPV systems. Journal of Process Control, 24(3):203–222, 2014.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the remaining of the theorem, and in its proof, the dependence of the matrices on the vector of scheduling parameters \(\theta (\tau )\) and the multiplicative faults \(f(\tau )\), or their estimation \(\hat{f}(\tau )\), will be omitted.
- 2.
The pitch angle interval for searching the reference input values has been chosen with \(\underline{\alpha }_v = \alpha _v^0 - 0.2\) and \({\overline{\alpha }}_v = \alpha _v^0 +0.3\).
- 3.
The state can be directly estimated from the available sensors, thus no observer has been designed.
References
Rotondo D, Nejjari F, Puig V (2014) A virtual actuator and sensor approach for fault tolerant control of LPV systems. J Process Control 24(3):203–222
Rotondo D, Nejjari F, Puig V, Blesa J (2015) Model reference FTC for LPV systems using virtual actuator and set-membership fault estimation. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 25(5):735–760
Rotondo D, Puig V, Nejjari F, Romera J (2015) A fault-hiding approach for the switching quasi-LPV fault tolerant control of a four-wheeled omnidirectional mobile robot. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 62(6):3932–3944
Rotondo D, Nejjari F, Puig V (2016) Fault tolerant control of a PEM fuel cell using Takagi-Sugeno virtual actuators. J Process Control 45:12–29
Steffen T (2005) Control reconfiguration of dynamical systems: linear approaches and structural tests. Lecture notes in control and information sciences, vol 230. Springer, Berlin
Lunze J, Steffen T (2006) Control reconfiguration after actuator failures using disturbance decoupling methods. IEEE Trans Autom Control 51(10):1590–1601
Montes de Oca S, Puig V, Witczak M, Dziekan L (2012) Fault-tolerant control strategy for actuator faults using LPV techniques: application to a two degree of freedom helicopter. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 22(1):161–171
Dziekan L, Witczak M, Korbicz J (2011) Active fault-tolerant control design for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci 59:93–102
Richter JH, Heemels WPMH, van de Wouw N, Lunze J (2011) Reconfigurable control of piecewise affine systems with actuator and sensor faults: stability and tracking. Automatica 47:678–691
Khosrowjerdi MJ, Barzegary S (2014) Fault tolerant control using virtual actuator for continuous-time Lipschitz nonlinear systems. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 24(16):2597–2607
Richter JH (2011) Reconfigurable control of nonlinear dynamical systems - a fault-hiding approach. Springer, Heidelberg
Do AL, Gomes da Silva JM, Sename O, Dugard L (2011) Control design for LPV systems with input saturation and state constraints: an application to a semi-active suspension. In: Proceedings of the 50th IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), pp 3416–3421
Tarbouriech S, Garcia G, Gomes da Silva JM, Queinnec I (2011) Stability and stabilization of linear systems with saturating actuators. Springer, London
Wu F, Grigoriadis KM, Packard A (2000) Anti-windup controller design using linear parameter-varying control methods. Int J Control 73(12):1104–1114
Abdullah A, Zribi M (2009) Model reference control of LPV systems. J Frankl Inst 346(9):854–871
Cauet S, Coirault P, Njeh M (2013) Diesel engine torque ripple reduction through LPV control in hybrid electric vehicle powertrain: experimental results. Control Eng Pract 21(12):1830–1840
Aström KJ, Wittenmark B (2003) Computer controlled systems: theory and design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Sundarapandian V (2002) Global asymptotic stability of nonlinear cascade systems. Appl Math Lett 15(3):275–277
Schur J (1917) Über Potenzreihen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschränkt sind. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 147:205–232
Rahideh A, Shaheed MH (2007) Mathematical dynamic modelling of a twin-rotor multiple input-multiple output system. IMechE J Syst Control Eng 221(1):89–101
Rotondo D, Nejjari F, Puig V (2013) Quasi-LPV modeling, identification and control of a twin rotor MIMO system. Control Eng Pract 21(6):829–846
Euler L (1768) Institutionum calculi integralis. Lipsiae et Berolini
Kwiatkowski A, Boll M-T, Werner H (2006) Automated generation and assessment of affine LPV models. In: Proceedings of the 45th IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 6690–6695
Löfberg J (2004) YALMIP: a toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In: Proceedings of the CACSD conference, pp 284–289
Sturm JF (1999) Using sedumi 1.02, a matlab toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optim Methods Softw 11(1–4):625–653
Oliveira HP, Sousa AJ, Moreira AP, Costa PJ (2009) Modeling and assessing of omni-directional robots with three and four wheels. In: Rodić AD (ed) Contemporary robotics - challenges and solutions. InTech
He X, Dimirovski GM, Zhao J (2010) Control of switched LPV systems using common Lyapunov function method and F-16 aircraft application. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernatics, pp 386–392
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rotondo, D. (2018). Fault Tolerant Control of LPV Systems Using Reconfigured Reference Model and Virtual Actuators. In: Advances in Gain-Scheduling and Fault Tolerant Control Techniques . Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62902-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62902-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62901-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62902-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)