Advertisement

Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment in an ESP Context

  • Yosra NaimiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

This study is an attempt to investigate the field of ESP testing, determine its teachers’ conceptions of assessment and find out the extent to which those conceptions correspond to classroom practices. It was carried out on a sample of 150 ESP teachers from different universities and institutes in Tunisia. Data were collected using a questionnaire, interview and test scores. Data analysis demonstrated that teachers have positive attitudes towards assessment. They maintained that testing plays an important role in both language learning and teaching and provides information about the efficacy of materials and teaching methodologies. Results of this study further show that testing has a major influence on the different aspects associated with the curriculum: Lessons’ content, classroom materials since teachers make use of parallel forms and test-related materials. Teachers’ understanding of the notion of washback effect was further confirmed by tests ‘scores as well as their classroom practices; yet it is rather recommended that other studies would be carried out in the same environment because of the lack of local sources and studies on the status of ESP.

Keywords

Teachers’ perceptions Washback Teaching materials Teaching methodologies Curriculum Teaching outcomes Teaching practices 

References

  1. Amengual, M. (2010). Exploring the washback effect of a high-stakes English test on the teaching of English in Spanish Upper secondary schools. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 23(2), 149–170. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/17429/1/RAEI_23_09.pdf
  2. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, K. M. (2005). Teachers and tests: Promoting positive washback. Paper presented at the TESOL Arabia Conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(3), 38–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheng, L., & Watanabe, Y. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Daoud, M. (1996). English language development in Tunisia. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. (1998). Developments in ESP: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Green, A. (2013). Washback in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13(2), 39–51. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://revistas.um.es/ije
  9. Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(2), 169–208.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hidri, S. (2015). Conceptions of Assessment: Investigating what assessment means to secondary and university teachers. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 19–43.Google Scholar
  11. Mehrens, W. A. (1991). Facts about samples, fantasies about domains. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice., 10(2), 23–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00190.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sadeghi, S. (2014). High-stake Test Preparation Courses: Washback in Accountability Contexts. Journal of Education & Human Development, 3(1), 17–26. Retrieved January 5, 2014, from http://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_3_No_1_March_2014/29.pdf
  13. Tsagari, D. (2007). Review of washback in language testing: How has been done? What more needs doing? Lancaster University, UK. Retrieved June 4, 2015, from http://www.academia.edu/517669/Review_of_Washback_in_Language_Testing_What_Has_Been_Done_What_More_Needs_Doing
  14. Wu, J. (2012). GEPT and English language teaching and testing in Taiwan. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(3), 11–25. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15434303.2011..553251

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishThe University of Letters, Arts and Humanities of ManoubaTunisTunisia

Personalised recommendations