Skip to main content

The Measurement of Language Ability and Impairment in Arabic-Speaking Children

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revisiting the Assessment of Second Language Abilities: From Theory to Practice

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

The present study adopted an epidemiological approach to assess sensitivity to developmental change and sex differences of several language measures in school age Arabic-speaking children. Of further interest was the degree to which individuals exhibit consistently low performance across the language measures. The study invited all Arabic speakers, from 6 to 9 years of age in several schools in Saudi Arabia. A total of 421 children completed a battery of Arabic language tests available in published or unpublished form. Results revealed that the majority of language measures were sensitive to developmental change in younger children between the ages of 6 and 7. Significant differences between children ages of 8 and 9 were observed on one test only. In addition, males scored higher than females on several measures. The findings indicate that Arabic language tests are not sensitive to age-related differences across the 6–9 year age range. Tests tapping more complex language skills for older children need to be developed. Sex differences with higher scores for males in several subtests may reflect cultural differences but require further investigation. The results suggest that there is a clear need to establish normative data across the ages studied in the current work. Developing such extensive norms will inform future Arabic language test design and develop measures sensitive to language development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdalla, F. (2002). Specific language impairment in Arabic-speaking children: Deficits in morphosyntax. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdalla, F., & Crago, M. (2008). Verb morphology defects in Arabic-speaking children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716408080156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alahmadi, S. D. (2015). Loanwords in the urban Meccan Hijazi dialect: An analysis of lexical variation according to speakers’ sex, age and education. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(6), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v5n6p34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Akeel, A. (1998). The acquisition of Arabic language comprehension by Saudi children. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Essa, A. (2006). When Najd meets Hijaz: dialect contact in Jeddah. A paper presented at the 7th International Conference of AIDA, Vienna (Austria), 6–9th September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aljenaie, K. (2001). The emergence of tense and agreement in Kuwaiti Arabic children. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tamimi, F. Y. (2011). Assessment of language development in Arabic. Encyclopaedia of Language and Literacy Development (pp. 1–9). London: Western University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, L. M. D., & Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Nonword repetition: A comparison of tests. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/070).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1994). Is specific language impairment a valid diagnostic category? Genetic and psycholinguistic evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 346, 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. East Sussex: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V. M., & Edmundson, A. (1987). Language impaired 4-year olds: Distinguishing transient from persistent impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 52, 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5202.156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukshaisha, F. (1985). An experimental phonetic study of some aspect of Qatari Arabic. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British picture vocabulary scale (2nd ed.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Halees, Y., & Wiig, E. H. (1999a). Arabic receptive-expressive vocabulary test: Preschool and school-age. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Halees, Y., & Wiig, E. H. (1999b). Arabic language screening tests: Preschool and school-age. Arlington, TX: Schema Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalaf, A., Ekblom, O., Kowalsk, J., Berggren, V., Westergren, A., & Al-Hazzaa, H. (2013). Female university students’ physical activity levels and associated factors-a cross- sectional study in southwestern Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 3502–3517. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10083502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnert, K. (2012). Processing skills in early sequential bilinguals. In B. Goldstein (Ed.), Bilingual language development & disorders in Spanish-English speakers. Brookes: Baltimore, MD. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00868.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, E. V. M. (1994). Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspect of language addressed to children. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 56–73). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620690.005.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nippold, M. A. (1998). Later language development: The school-age and adolescent years (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pence, K. L., & Justice, L. M. (2008). Language development from theory to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1989a). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (revised). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1989b). CELF-R screening test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1995). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E. M., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1996). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaalan, S. (2010). Investigating grammatical complexity in Gulf Arabic speaking children with specific language impairment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieny, M. E. (1978). The syntax of urban Hijazi Arabic. Beirut, Lebanon: Librairie du Liban.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & El-Halees, Y. (2000). Developing a language screening test for Arabic-speaking children. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 52(6), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1159/000021544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1989). Test of language competence (TLC) (Expanded edition). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (1992). Test of word knowledge. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, E. H., Secord, W. A., & Semel, E. M. (1992). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-preschool. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (1992). Preschool language scale (PLS-3). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding to the first author from King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia, and a discovery grant to the second author from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Areej Balilah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Descriptive statistic far all language tasks scores as a function of age band: 6–6;11 (n = 106), 7–7;11 (n = 104), 8–8;11 (n = 106), and 9–9;11 (n = 105)

Age

M

SD

Range

Skew.

Kurt.

Arabic receptive-expressive vocabulary test a

Arabic receptive vocabulary test

6–6;11

34.25

(−1.27)

2.66

(0.40)

28–40

(−2.22/−0.47)

−0.27

−0.50

7–7;11

40.33

(−0.36)

2.34

(0.35)

34–45

(−1.31/0.35)

−0.33

−0.51

8–8;11

45.35

(0.40)

2.48

(0.37)

38–50

(−0.71/1.10)

−0.74

0.26

9–9;11

50.77

(1.23)

2.72

(0.35)

35–55

(0.19/1.86)

−2.23

10.09

Arabic expressive vocabulary test

6–6;11

29.90

(−1.10)

3.60

(0.52)

23–38

(−2.10/0.07)

0.37

−0.28

7–7;11

34.70

(−0.41)

3.84

(0.55)

22–43

(−2.24/0.79)

−0.24

0.12

8–8;11

40.23

(0.39)

3.66

(0.52)

27–49

(−1.38/1.66)

−0.05

0.77

9–9;11

45.25

(1.12)

4.11

(0.59)

35–55

(−0.36/−2.53)

0.102

−0.09

Total-Arabic receptive-expressive vocabulary test

6–6;11

64.15

(−1.23)

5.02

(0.39)

53–77

(−2.09/−0.24)

0.04

−0.44

7–7;11

75.03

(−39)

5.02

(0.39)

58–88

(−1.71/0.60)

−0.47

0.36

8–8;11

85.58

(0.41)

5.06

(0.39)

68–99

(−0.94/1.45)

−0.35

0.54

9–9;11

96.02

(1.22)

5.71

(0.44)

78–109

(−0.17/2.22)

−0.47

1.26

Arabic picture vocabulary test

6–6;11

95.47

10.61

72–116

−0.23

−0.62

7–7;11

100.04

11.75

58–119

−1.11

1.93

8–8;11

103.85

9.61

72–119

−0.89

0.89

9–9;11

106.12

11.92

65–123

−1.01

1.05

Arabic language screening test

Arabic language screening test (verbal abilities)

6–6;11

34.03

8.33

14–53

0.08

−0.57

7–7;11

38.05

7.45

19–52

−0.31

−0.54

8–8;11

40.23

6.89

22–54

−0.51

−0.13

9–9;11

41.62

6.64

22–56

−0.32

0.01

Arabic language screening test (non-verbal abilities)

6–6;11

20.92

6.41

4–34

0.11

−0.48

7–7;11

23.87

5.22

14–34

0.24

−0.92

8–8;11

25.55

4.26

16–36

−0.14

−0.16

9–9;11

25.37

5.11

9–35

−0.71

1.26

Total-Arabic language screening test

6–6;11

54.94

13.54

22–81

0.07

−0.91

7–7;11

61.91

11.31

39–84

−0.18

−0.78

8–8;11

65.77

9.77

40–87

−0.52

−0.06

9–9;11

66.99

10.21

37–89

−0.35

0.37

Arabic language test

Sentence comprehension (A)

6–6;11

19.42

2.39

8–22

−2.69

10.33

7–7;11

19.83

2.51

9–22

−2.29

5.97

8–8;11

20.32

1.75

10–22

−2.41

10.58

9–9;11

20.32

2.42

7–22

−3.09

11.83

Sentence comprehension (B)

6–6;11

12.34

2.52

4–18

−0.69

0.64

7–7;11

13.19

2.79

5–18

−0.63

0.39

8–8;11

14.22

2.30

6–18

−0.76

1.02

9–9;11

14.47

2.87

4–18

−1.26

2.28

Total-sentence comprehension

6–6;11

31.76

4.12

14–39

−1.73

5.02

7–7;11

33.02

4.36

16–40

−1.61

3.81

8–8;11

34.54

3.46

16–40

−1.81

7.02

9–9;11

34.79

4.75

12–40

−2.15

6.53

Expressive language (A)

6–6;11

16.91

3.58

7–24

−0.195

−0.108

7–7;11

18.65

2.98

10–24

−0.24

−0.21

8–8;11

18.93

3.01

11–24

−0.48

−0.25

9–9;11

18.82

2.77

11–24

−0.69

0.49

Expressive language (B)

6–6;11

32.04

6.47

19–44

−0.27

−0.76

7–7;11

35.43

4.89

23–44

−0.40

−0.13

8–8;11

36.75

4.49

25–44

−0.33

−0.69

9–9;11

36.76

4.07

27–44

−0.34

−0.31

Total-expressive language

6–6;11

48.94

9.41

26–68

1.13

−0.61

7–7;11

54.09

7.15

33–68

−0.35

0.02

8–8;11

55.68

6.86

40–67

−0.31

−0.94

9–9;11

55.58

6.23

42–68

−0.42

−0.33

Sentence repetition (A)

6–6;11

50.30

4.53

34–54

−2.03

4.09

7–7;11

51.40

4.69

27–54

−2.56

7.65

8–8;11

51.84

3.96

30–54

−2.61

8.61

9–9;11

51.68

6.10

22–54

−3.30

10.49

Sentence repetition (B)

6–6;11

39.93

11.59

15–64

−0.09

−0.76

7–7;11

46.58

9.07

26–67

−0.09

−0.51

8–8;11

47.49

8.92

30–65

−0.10

−1

9–9;11

50.18

10.19

19–69

−0.71

−0.11

Total-sentence repetition

6–6;11

90.24

12.30

61–118

−0.22

−0.27

7–7;11

97.98

8.98

75–115

−0.21

−0.37

8–8;11

99.33

9.54

71–116

−0.29

−0.56

9–9;11

101.86

13.86

55–123

−1.42

1.73

Total-Arabic language test

6–6;11

170.94

20.90

115–224

−0.16

0.01

7–7;11

185.09

15.36

147–217

−0.28

−0.22

8–8;11

189.55

15.30

149–216

−0.30

−0.49

9–9;11

192.23

20.63

134–230

−1.13

0.73

Nonword repetition task

6–6;11

37.23

7.98

7–48

−1.33

2.43

7–7;11

39.23

6.62

16–48

−1.27

2.09

8–8;11

38.89

6.66

13–48

−1.18

2.02

9–9;11

39.26

7.04

5–48

−1.52

4.84

  1. aRaw scores (z-scores)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balilah, A., Archibald, L. (2018). The Measurement of Language Ability and Impairment in Arabic-Speaking Children. In: Hidri, S. (eds) Revisiting the Assessment of Second Language Abilities: From Theory to Practice. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62884-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62884-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62883-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62884-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics