Advertisement

Utilizing Dynamic Assessment to Activate EFL Inert Grammar

  • Mahmoud IbrahimEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

Although the inert knowledge problem in grammar is old in the literature, research has hardly proposed how the gap—already existing—between inert and activated types of knowledge can be bridged through clear strategies. The study proposed uses dynamic assessment (DA) as a means to detect areas of inert knowledge in the grammatical acquired system of adult Egyptian EFL learners. Learners’ Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) is specified for the purpose of activating grammatical inert knowledge and make it fully acquired in the learners’ interlanguage system. Using the interventionist approach of DA, this study investigated the effectiveness of DA and ZPD on activating EFL learners’ inert grammatical knowledge.

Keywords

Inert knowledge Activated knowledge Dynamic assessment Grammar Zone of proximal development Procedural grammar Declarative grammar 

References

  1. Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assalahi, H. M. (2013). Why is the grammar translation method still alive in the Arab world? Teachers’ beliefs and its implications for EFL teacher education. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(4), 589–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2–27). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1981). A theoretical framework for communicative competence. In A. Palmer, P. Groot, & G. Trosper (Eds.), The construct validation of test of communicative competence (pp. 31–36). Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
  6. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
  7. DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harding, L., Alderson, C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317–336.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214564505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hidri, S. (2014). Developing and evaluating a dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in an EFL context. Language Testing in Asia, 4(4), 2–19.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-4-4.Google Scholar
  10. Ibrahim, M. (2015) Developing the pre-service EFL teachers’ both grammatical accuracy and constructivist teaching skills for pedagogical grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Alexandria University.Google Scholar
  11. Jing, X. (2011). Applying active learning to grammar teaching for non-native English majors in EFL class settings. Master’s thesis in the University of Wisconsin-Platteville.Google Scholar
  12. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lantolf, J. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355–368.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lantolf, J., & Poehner, M. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–49.  https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston, MA: Thomson Heinle.Google Scholar
  16. Lidz, C. S., & Gindis, B. (2003). Dynamic assessment of the evolving cognitive functions in children. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 99–116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Limakina, O., & Ryshina-Pankova, M. (2012). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar as a resource for making meaning. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 270–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luria, A. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. A Journal of Human Behavior, 31(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. McLaughlin, B. (1993). Myths and misconceptions about second language learning: What every teacher needs to unlearn. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  20. Navarro, E., & Calero, M. (2009). Estimation of cognitive plasticity in old adults using dynamic assessment techniques. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 8(1), 38–51.  https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.8.1.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Philips, D. (2001). Longman computer course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Poehner, M. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Poehner, M., & Lantolf, J. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thorne, S. (2005). Epistemology, politics, and ethics in sociocultural theory. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thouësny, S. (2010). Assessing second language learners’ written texts: An interventionist and interactionist approach to dynamic assessment (pp. 3517–3522). In Proceedings of the World Conference on Education, Multimedia, Hypermedia and telecommunications (ED-Media), 28 June 2010–2 July 2010, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wang, F. (2010). The necessity of grammar teaching. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 78–81.Google Scholar
  29. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  30. Yu, Q. (2008). On the importance of grammar teaching. Vocational Education, 25, 110–111.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JeddahJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations