Advertisement

Assessing Literature for the Classroom Among Female Learners of English in an EFL Context in Saudi Arabia

  • Manal QutubEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

Assessing the construct of literature in an EFL context, such as Saudi Arabia, has been a neglected area basically for different educational, social and practical reasons. This study investigated the assessment of a literature course among 60 female students that ranged in age between 17 and 20 at a tertiary level in KSA. An achievement exam on testing a literature task was administered to these students. The results of the study conducted at the Girls’ College of Education in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, indicated that some of EFL students were incapable of understanding and dealing with literary texts. Their deficiencies were attributed to the traditional teaching methods applied to the teaching of literature on the one hand and to the language weaknesses and the conventional ways of presenting literature in EFL classes, on the other. The different statistical tests carried out showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the means of freshmen EFL students’ achievement scores in the control and experimental groups on the fiction achievement post-test at p < 0.05 significance level. Recommendations were highlighted to consider defining the construct of literature both theoretically and operationally and to design a list of test specifications that literature teachers should implement to measure this construct for learners of English in a similar context. The study had implications for research and pedagogy.

Keywords

Literature Assessment Literary tasks Construct Achievement Test specifications 

References

  1. Abdul-Jabbar, H. Y. (1990). Drama in the English curriculum: A reconsideration of the principles covering the course in Arab universities with application to sample dramatic texts usually chosen for the course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Girls’ College of Education, Makkah.Google Scholar
  2. Abdul-Jabbar, H. Y. (2003). Promoting students’ English language through the teaching of literature: A mini-course guide for the teaching of Hamlet. Mecca: Umm Al-Qura University.Google Scholar
  3. Abdullah, M. S. (2005). The effect of using a multiple intelligences-based training program on developing English majors’ oral communication skills. MA Thesis, Assiut University, Assiut.Google Scholar
  4. Adam, H., & Harper, L. (2016). Assessing and selecting culturally diverse literature for the classroom. Practical Literacy: The Early & Primary Years, 21(2), 10–14.Google Scholar
  5. Akyel, A., & Yalçin, E. (1990). Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement. ELT Journal, 44(3), 174–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al Saedi, L. (1998). Promoting students’ mastery of English through drama teaching: An eclectic approach. Master Thesis, Girls’ College of Education, Makkah.Google Scholar
  7. Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Faki, I. M. (2014). Using literature in EFL classes: Assessing the suitability of literary texts to secondary school students. European Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(4), 9–21.Google Scholar
  9. Al-Hazmi, S. (2007). Current issues in English education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Modern Languages, 17, 129–150.Google Scholar
  10. Anderson, V. B. (1998). Using multiple intelligences to improve retention in foreign language vocabulary study. Master of Arts Action Research Project, St. Xavier University, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  11. Arikan, A. (2008). Using internet groups in the learning of literature. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 34(1), 19–26.Google Scholar
  12. Baird, S. R. (1994). Assessing student achievement in the study of literature. The English Journal, 83(8), 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bassnett, S., & Grundy, P. (1993). Language through literature: Creative language teaching through literature. Singapore: Longman.Google Scholar
  14. Bernhardt, E. B. (1995). Teaching literature or teaching students. ADFL Bulletin, 26(2), 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bredella, L. & Werner D. (Eds.). (1996). Challenges of literary texts in the foreign language classroom. Tubingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
  16. Brown-Chidsey, R., Johnson, P., & Fernstrom, R. (2005). Comparison of grade-level controlled and literature-based maze CBM reading passages. School Psychology Review, 34(3), 387–394.Google Scholar
  17. Brumfit, C. J. (1990). Language and literature teaching: From practice to principles (2nd ed.). Oxford: Pergamum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Carter, R., & McRae, J. (Eds.). (1997). Language, literature and the learner. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Chang, H. S. (2003). Difficulties in studying and teaching literature survey courses in English departments in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  21. Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1987). Literature in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Faber, P. (1998). Through the camera’s lens: An innovative approach to analyzing literature. In W. Gewehr, G. Catsimali, P. Faber, M. J. Raya, & A. J. Peck (Eds.), Aspects of modern language teaching in Europe (pp. 83–92). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gohlinghorst, N., & Becky, W. (2001). Enhancing student achievement in social studies through the use of multiple intelligences. Social Studies Journal, 34(1), 13–39.Google Scholar
  25. Halasz, L. (1991). Emotional effect and reminding in literary processing. Poetics, 20, 247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haley, H. M. (2004). Learner-centered instruction and the theory of multiple intelligences with second language learners. Teachers College Record, 2(1), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response theory and ELT. ELT Journal, 50(2), 127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kauffman, R. A. (1996). Writing to read and reading to write: Teaching literature in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim, J. (2002). Teaching culture in the English as foreign language classroom. The Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), 27–40.Google Scholar
  31. Kodama, K. (2012). The role of literature in the EFL/ESL classroom revisited: Using literature in communicative language teaching. Bulletin of the Graduate Schools of International Cultural Studies, Aichi Prefectural University, 13, 31–56.Google Scholar
  32. Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse model. Modern Language Journal, 56(2), 356–366.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, C. D., & Goldman, S. R. (2015). Assessing literary reasoning: Text and task complexities. Theory Into Practice, 54, 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maley, A., & Alan, D. (1989). The inward ear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Nguyen, T. T. (2002). Differential effects of multiple intelligences curriculum on student performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  36. Ogeyik, M. C. (2007). Attitudes of the students in English language teaching programs towards literature teaching. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27(2), 151–162.Google Scholar
  37. Pickering, J. H. (1998). Fiction 100: An anthology of short stories. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Pope, R. (1995). Textual intervention: Critical and creative strategies for literary studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Quattrocki, E. (1976). Classroom presentations of Shakespeare. Teaching English in Southern Ohio. Teaching Shakespeare, 11(3), 26–33.Google Scholar
  40. Quda, M. (1994). Literature is a great vehicle for understanding language and culture (pp. 61–73). 13 National Symposium Proceedings, Cairo, CDET. Google Scholar
  41. Rasmussen, K. L. (1998). Hypermedia and learning styles: Can performance be influenced? Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4), 425–431.Google Scholar
  42. Riding, R., & Michael, G. (1999). Cognitive style and learning from multimedia materials in 11-year children. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Savvidou, C. (2004). An integrated approach to teaching literature in EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, X(12).Google Scholar
  44. Stern, S. L. (1985). Teaching literature in ESL/EFL: An integrative approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  45. Widdowson, H. G. (1975). Stylistic and the teaching of literature. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  46. Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Teaching language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Zyngier, S. (1994). Literature in the EFL classroom: Making a comeback, PALA. The Poetics and Linguistics Association. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Colgio Pedro, Occasional Papers No. 6.Google Scholar
  48. Zywno, M. S., & Waalen, J. K. (2002). The effect of individual learning styles on student outcomes in technology-enabled education. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 6(1), 42–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JeddahEnglish Language InstituteJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations