Skip to main content

South China Sea and Political Demography: The Cases of Vietnam and the Philippines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific ((CSAP))

  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

In the South China Sea maritime territorial disputes, only two rival claimants have so far taken a strong stand against Chinese claims: Vietnam and the Philippines. This chapter argues that the reason for their less-complacent attitude is believed to lie in their internal issues: massive populations of around 100 million individuals cramped in relatively small territories with few domestic resources to fall back on. This simple fact has compelled the two nations to vigorously defend, separately, their claims against what they perceive as Chinese territorial expansion. Vietnam has resorted to a multifaceted strategy, shifting from a national to an international focus; the Philippines has long weighed its options and finally decided to lodge an international arbitration against China as the main tool to assert its claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chap. 1 for an in-depth analysis (Hayton 2017).

  2. 2.

    Alfred Thayer Mahan (1840–1914) was a United States Navy officer, widely considered the world’s foremost theorist of military sea power.

  3. 3.

    In theory, all resources are renewable, but those labeled non-renewable cannot renew themselves within a meaningful human time frame. For example, fossil fuels take thousands of years to form.

  4. 4.

    A note verbale (verbal note) is a diplomatic communication prepared in the third person and unsigned: less formal than a note (also called a letter of protest), but more formal than an aide-mémoire (a memo).

  5. 5.

    A continental shelf is an underwater landmass which extends from the above-water continent, resulting in an area of relatively shallow water known as a shelf sea. A continental shelf is limited by the continental margin, from which starts a continental slope down to the abyssal plain.

  6. 6.

    UNCLOS was signed in 1982 and came into force in 1994, a year after Guyana became the 60th nation to ratify the treaty. As of January 2015, 166 countries and the European Union have joined the Convention.

  7. 7.

    Baseline: the starting point along the national coasts of a country from which to measure its claims to maritime zones.

  8. 8.

    “Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order, or security of the coastal State” (UNCLOS PART II, Article 19, Sec. 1).

Bibliography

  • Bloom, David E., David Canning, and Jaypee Sevilla. The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change. Arlington: Rand Corporation, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, David E., and Jocelyn E Finlay. “Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia.” PGDA Working Paper, no. 41 (September 2008). Accessed February 5, 2017. https://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1288/2013/10/PGDA_WP_41.pdf.

  • Bloom, David, and Jeffrey Williamson. “Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia.” NBER Working Paper, no. 6268 (November 1997). Accessed February 5, 2017. http://www.nber.org/papers/w6268.pdf.

  • Bloom, David E. et al. “Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia.” Population and Development Review, no 26 (Supplement), 2001, 257–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boserup, Ester. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure. London: George Allen & Allen Unwin Ltd, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres, Sigfrido Burgos. China’s Strategic Interests in the South China Sea: Power and Resources. New York: Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Caitlin, Ethan Meick, Kimberly Hsu, and Craig Murray. China’s “Core Interests” and the East China Sea. Washington: U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2013. http://www.uscc.gov/Research/china%E2%80%99s-%E2%80%9Ccore-interests%E2%80%9D-and-east-china-sea. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Choucri, Nazli, and Robert Carver North. Nations in Conflict: National Growth and International Violence. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choucri, Nazli, Robert Carver North, and Susumu Yamakage. The Challenge of Japan Before World War II and After: A Study of National Growth and Expansion. London: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Coming Up Jasmine.” The Economist. August 23, 2014. http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21613336-once-laggard-economy-philippines-starting-catch-up-coming-up. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Diamond, Jared M. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Florian, and Pierre-Marie Dupuy. “A Legal Analysis of China’s Historic Rights Claim in the South China Sea.” The American Journal of International Law 107, no. 1 (January 2013), 124–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, Peter A. “The Sino-Philippine Maritime Row: International Arbitration and the South China Sea.” East and South China Seas Bulletin, no. 10 (March 2013). https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/162590/CNAS_Bulletin_Dutton_TheSinoPhilippineMaritimeRow_0.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Fravel, Taylor. “China’s Strategy in the South China Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 33, no. 3 (December 2011), 292–319. doi:10.1355/cs33-3b.

  • Fravel, Taylor. “International Relations Theory and China’s Rise: Assessing China’s Potential for Territorial Expansion.” International Studies Review 12, no. 4 (December 2010), 505–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, Jack A., Eric Kauffman, and Monica Duffy Toft, editors. Political Demography: How Population Changes Are Reshaping International Security and National Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayton, Bill. “Writing the History of the South China Sea Disputes.” In Beneath the Surface: Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea, edited by Jonathan Spangler, Dean Karalekas, and Moises Lopes de Souza. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, Sandy. “The Great Denial: Puncturing Pro-Natalist Myths.” In Wild Earth: Wild Ideas for a World Out of Balance, edited by Tom Butler. Minneapolis: Milkweed Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard, and Neil Howe. The Graying of the Great Powers: Demography and Geopolitics in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livezey, William Edmund. Mahan on Sea Power, 1st ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population: An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard, 1798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modelski, George, and William R. Thompson. Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organski, A.F.K. World Politics. New York: Knopf, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China. Notes Verbale. New York: The UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), 2009. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/vnm37_09/chn_2009re_vnm.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China. Notes Verbales. New York: UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), 2011. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/mysvnm33_09/chn_2011_re_phl_e.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Resolution of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the Approval of the Declaration of the Government on China’s Territorial Sea. Beijing: Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, 1958. http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/rotscotnpcotaotdotgocts1338/. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Shoji, Tomotaka. “Vietnam, ASEAN, and the South China Sea: Unity or Diverseness?” NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, no. 13 (December 2012), 3–21. http://www.nids.mod.go.jp/english/publication/kiyo/pdf/2012/bulletin_e2012_2.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Simon, Julian Lincoln. The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Yann-huei. “The Application of Article 121 of the Law of the Sea Convention to the Selected Geographical Features Situated in the Pacific Ocean.” Chinese Journal of International Law 9, no. 4 (2010), 663–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • The South China Sea Arbitration: The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China. The Hague: Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2016. https://pca-cpa.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/175/2016/07/PH-CN-20160712-Press-Release-No-11-English.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Swaine, Michael D., and Ashley J Tellis. Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2000. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1121.html. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Tønnesson, Stein. “Vietnam’s Objective in the South China Sea: National or Regional Security?” Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 1 (April 2000), 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations (UN). “Juridical Regime of Historic Waters Including Historic Bays.” In Yearbook of The International Law Commission Vol. II, 1–26. New York: The United Nations General Assembly, 1962. http://legal.un.org/docs/?path=../ilc/publications/yearbooks/english/ilc_1962_v2.pdf&lang=EFS. Accessed February 5, 2017.

  • Valencia, Mark J. Energy and Geopolitics in the South China Sea: Implications for ASEAN and Its Dialogue Partners. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, Michael. “What’s at Stake in the South China Sea?” Lowy Institute, 2012. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/whats-stake-south-china-sea. Accessed February 5, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maranzana De Filippis, F. (2018). South China Sea and Political Demography: The Cases of Vietnam and the Philippines. In: Spangler, J., Karalekas, D., Lopes de Souza, M. (eds) Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea . Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62828-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics