South China Sea and Political Demography: The Cases of Vietnam and the Philippines

  • Filippo Maranzana De Filippis
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)


In the South China Sea maritime territorial disputes, only two rival claimants have so far taken a strong stand against Chinese claims: Vietnam and the Philippines. This chapter argues that the reason for their less-complacent attitude is believed to lie in their internal issues: massive populations of around 100 million individuals cramped in relatively small territories with few domestic resources to fall back on. This simple fact has compelled the two nations to vigorously defend, separately, their claims against what they perceive as Chinese territorial expansion. Vietnam has resorted to a multifaceted strategy, shifting from a national to an international focus; the Philippines has long weighed its options and finally decided to lodge an international arbitration against China as the main tool to assert its claims.


  1. Bloom, David E., David Canning, and Jaypee Sevilla. The Demographic Dividend: A New Perspective on the Economic Consequences of Population Change. Arlington: Rand Corporation, 2003.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, David E., and Jocelyn E Finlay. “Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia.” PGDA Working Paper, no. 41 (September 2008). Accessed February 5, 2017.
  3. Bloom, David, and Jeffrey Williamson. “Demographic Transitions and Economic Miracles in Emerging Asia.” NBER Working Paper, no. 6268 (November 1997). Accessed February 5, 2017.
  4. Bloom, David E. et al. “Demographic Change and Economic Growth in Asia.” Population and Development Review, no 26 (Supplement), 2001, 257–290.Google Scholar
  5. Boserup, Ester. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change Under Population Pressure. London: George Allen & Allen Unwin Ltd, 1965.Google Scholar
  6. Cáceres, Sigfrido Burgos. China’s Strategic Interests in the South China Sea: Power and Resources. New York: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, Caitlin, Ethan Meick, Kimberly Hsu, and Craig Murray. China’s “Core Interests” and the East China Sea. Washington: U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2013. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  8. Choucri, Nazli, and Robert Carver North. Nations in Conflict: National Growth and International Violence. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  9. Choucri, Nazli, Robert Carver North, and Susumu Yamakage. The Challenge of Japan Before World War II and After: A Study of National Growth and Expansion. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. “Coming Up Jasmine.” The Economist. August 23, 2014. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  11. Diamond, Jared M. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Dupuy, Florian, and Pierre-Marie Dupuy. “A Legal Analysis of China’s Historic Rights Claim in the South China Sea.” The American Journal of International Law 107, no. 1 (January 2013), 124–141.Google Scholar
  13. Dutton, Peter A. “The Sino-Philippine Maritime Row: International Arbitration and the South China Sea.” East and South China Seas Bulletin, no. 10 (March 2013). Accessed February 5, 2017.
  14. Fravel, Taylor. “China’s Strategy in the South China Sea.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 33, no. 3 (December 2011), 292–319. doi: 10.1355/cs33-3b.
  15. Fravel, Taylor. “International Relations Theory and China’s Rise: Assessing China’s Potential for Territorial Expansion.” International Studies Review 12, no. 4 (December 2010), 505–32.Google Scholar
  16. Goldstone, Jack A., Eric Kauffman, and Monica Duffy Toft, editors. Political Demography: How Population Changes Are Reshaping International Security and National Politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2011.Google Scholar
  17. Hayton, Bill. “Writing the History of the South China Sea Disputes.” In Beneath the Surface: Enterprises, Localities, People, and Policy in the South China Sea, edited by Jonathan Spangler, Dean Karalekas, and Moises Lopes de Souza. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
  18. Irvine, Sandy. “The Great Denial: Puncturing Pro-Natalist Myths.” In Wild Earth: Wild Ideas for a World Out of Balance, edited by Tom Butler. Minneapolis: Milkweed Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, Richard, and Neil Howe. The Graying of the Great Powers: Demography and Geopolitics in the 21st Century. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2008.Google Scholar
  20. Livezey, William Edmund. Mahan on Sea Power, 1st ed. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  21. Malthus, Thomas. An Essay on the Principle of Population: An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J. Johnson, in St. Paul’s Church-Yard, 1798.Google Scholar
  22. Modelski, George, and William R. Thompson. Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  23. Organski, A.F.K. World Politics. New York: Knopf, 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China. Notes Verbale. New York: The UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), 2009. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  25. Permanent Mission of the People’s Republic of China. Notes Verbales. New York: UN Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), 2011. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  26. Resolution of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the Approval of the Declaration of the Government on China’s Territorial Sea. Beijing: Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China, 1958. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  27. Shoji, Tomotaka. “Vietnam, ASEAN, and the South China Sea: Unity or Diverseness?” NIDS Journal of Defense and Security, no. 13 (December 2012), 3–21. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  28. Simon, Julian Lincoln. The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  29. Song, Yann-huei. “The Application of Article 121 of the Law of the Sea Convention to the Selected Geographical Features Situated in the Pacific Ocean.” Chinese Journal of International Law 9, no. 4 (2010), 663–98.Google Scholar
  30. The South China Sea Arbitration: The Republic of Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China. The Hague: Permanent Court of Arbitration, 2016. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  31. Swaine, Michael D., and Ashley J Tellis. Interpreting China’s Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2000. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  32. Tønnesson, Stein. “Vietnam’s Objective in the South China Sea: National or Regional Security?” Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 1 (April 2000), 199–220.Google Scholar
  33. The United Nations (UN). “Juridical Regime of Historic Waters Including Historic Bays.” In Yearbook of The International Law Commission Vol. II, 1–26. New York: The United Nations General Assembly, 1962. Accessed February 5, 2017.
  34. Valencia, Mark J. Energy and Geopolitics in the South China Sea: Implications for ASEAN and Its Dialogue Partners. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Wesley, Michael. “What’s at Stake in the South China Sea?” Lowy Institute, 2012. Accessed February 5, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filippo Maranzana De Filippis
    • 1
  1. 1.International Doctoral Program in Asia-Pacific StudiesNational Chengchi UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations