Finite Time Thermodynamic Analysis of Brayton Cycle



The Brayton cycle was first proposed by George Brayton in 1870 for the reciprocating oil-burning engine and has been extensively used in power plants and aeroplanes since then. Today, it is used for gas turbines only where both the compression/expansion processes may operate on either in an open or a closed cycle. The Brayton cycle may be either an open or a closed cycle depending on the working fluid; e.g., for gas other than air, a closed cycle is desirable. In the open cycle, the atmospheric air is continuously drawn into the compressor, where it is compressed to a high pressure. The air then enters the combustion chamber where it is mixed with the fuel and combustion occurs, resulting in combustion products at an elevated temperature and pressure. The combustion product at high temperature and pressure then expands through the turbine and subsequently discharged to the atmosphere. Also, the turbine work developed is partly used to drive the compressor, while the remainder is available to generate electricity, to propel vehicle, and/or for other useful purposes (Fig. 3.1a).The open gas turbine cycle described here can be modelled as a closed cycle by utilizing the air standard assumption, as shown in Fig. 3.1b.


Brayton Cycle Finite Time Thermodynamic Analysis Working Fluid Heat Capacity Rate Cycle Pressure Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bejan, A. (1982). Entropy generation through heat and fluid flow. John Wiley, New York, 181.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, L., Zheng, J., Sun, F. and Wu, C. (2001). Optimum distribution of heat exchanger inventory for power density optimization of an endoreversible closed Brayton cycle. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys, 34, 422–427.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Curzon, F.L. and Ahlborn, B. (1975). Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output. American Journal of Physics, 43, 22–24.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ibrahim, O.M., Klein, S.A. and Mitchell, J.W. (1991). Optimum heat power cycles for specified boundary conditions. J. Engg. Gas Turbines Power, 113, 514–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaushik, S.C. and Tyagi, S.K. (2002). Finite time thermodynamic analysis of a nonisentropic regenerative Brayton heat engine. Int. J. Solar Energy, 22, 141–151.Google Scholar
  6. Kumar, S. (2000). Finite time thermodynamic analysis and second law evaluation of thermal energy conversion systems. Ph.D. Thesis, C.C.S. University, Meerut India.Google Scholar
  7. Sahin, B., Kodal, A. and Kaya, S.S. (1998). A comparative performance analysis of irreversible regenerative reheating Joule-Brayton heat engine under maximum power density and maximum power condition. J. Phys D: Appl. Phys. 31, 2125–2131.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wu, C. and Kiang, R.L. (1992). Finite time thermodynamic analysis of a Carnot engine with internal irreversibility. Energy, 17(12), 1173–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Energy StudiesIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Solid State Physics Laboratory (SSPL)New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations