Advertisement

Time and the Vampire: The Idea of the Past in Carmilla and Dracula

  • Stephanie GreenEmail author
Chapter
  • 474 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Gothic book series (PAGO)

Abstract

This chapter explores the ways in which vampires encapsulate the idea of the past by means of their ambiguous temporality. Prisoners of a past they can never escape, vampires are yet also able to transcend the tyranny of embodied decay. The vampire emerged as a figure of intimate predation in popular fiction during the mid- to late nineteenth-century, with Irish writer Sheridan Le Fanu’s novella Carmilla (1871), followed by compatriot Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897). A key representational figure for exploring the ambiguities of power, in these texts the vampire features as both predator and prey. Later nineteenth-century vampire fiction contributed to a resurgence in the literary celebrations of Gothic excess that had been published at least a century earlier by Walpole, Edgeworth and Radcliffe. With their precursors, Le Fanu and Stoker convey a spectacle of European aristocracy in decline, while also evoking the idea of the past in inherently conflicted terms. The “history” of the vampire is presented in Carmilla and Dracula through multiple perspectives and interwoven chronological shifts, through which the recountability of human adventure—inflected with modern notions of reason and scientific investigation—comes face to face with the ravages of a living supernatural past. Both hosts and hostages of ancient familial legacy, immune to decay and capable of strange reproduction through intimate conquest, as Carmilla suggests, at least in fictional terms, only the vampire bloodline never dies.

References

  1. Auerbach, Nina. 1995. Our Vampires, Ourselves. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. Forms of Time and of the Chronotope in the Novel: Notes Towards a Historical Poetics. In The Dialogical Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Michael Holquist, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, 84–258. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benefiel, Candace R. 2004. Blood Relations: The Gothic Perversion of the Nuclear Family in Anne Rice’s Interview with the Vampire. The Journal of Popular Culture 38 (2): 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock, Marilyn. 2009. The Vamp and the Good English Mother: Female Roles in Dracula and Carmilla. In From Wollstonecraft to Stoker: Essays on Gothic and Victorian Sensation Fiction, ed. Marilyn Brock, 120–131. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  5. Browning, John Edward. 2012. Bram Stoker’s Dracula: The Critical Feast. Berkeley, CA: Apocryphile Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byron, Glennis. 2013. The Gothic World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Clasen, Mathias. 2010. Vampire Apocalypse: A Biocultural Critique of Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend. Philosophy and Literature 34 (2): 313–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eighteen-Bisang, Robert and Elizabeth Miller. 2008. Bram Stoker’s Notes for Dracula: A Facsimile Edition. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
  9. Hughes, William. 2008. Bram Stoker—Dracula. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Hustis, Harriet. 2001. Black and White and Read All Over: Performative Textuality in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Studies in the Novel 33 (1): 18–33.Google Scholar
  11. Khader, Jamil. 2012. Un/Speakability and Radical Otherness: The Ethics of Trauma in Bram Stoker’s Dracula. College Literature 39 (2): 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khair, Tabish, and Johan Höglund. 2012. Introduction: Transnational and Postcolonial Vampires. In Transnational and Postcolonial Vampires: Dark Blood, ed. Johan Höglund, and Tabish Khair, 1–9. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Le Fanu, Sheridan J. 1872. Carmilla. In In a Glass Darkly, vol. 3, 49–270. London: Bentley & Son. https://archive.org/stream/inglassdarkly03lefa/lpage/n7/mode/2up. Accessed 15 Oct 2016.
  14. Longinović, Toma. 2011. Vampire Nation: Violence as Cultural Imaginary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McAteer, Michael. 2010. A Troubled Union: Representations of Eastern Europe in Nineteenth-Century Irish Protestant Literature. In Facing the East in the West: Images of Eastern Europe in British Literature, Film and Culture, ed. Barbara Korte, Eva U. Pirker, and Sissy Helff, 205–218. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  16. Michaelis, Angelica. 2003. ‘Dirty Mamma’: Horror, Vampires, and the Maternal in Late Nineteenth-Century Gothic Fiction. Critical Survey 15 (3): 5–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41557221. Accessed 3 June 2016.
  17. Piatti-Farnell, Lorna, and Erin Mercer. 2014. Gothic: New Directions in Media and Popular Culture. M/C Journal 17 (4). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/880. Accessed 25 Sept 2016.
  18. Punter, David. 1996. The Literature of Terror: Volume 2: The Modern Gothic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Ruston, Sharon. 2008. Literature and Science Cambridge: Boyden and Brewer Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Schmitt, Cannon. 1994. Mother Dracula: Orientalism, Degeneration, and Anglo-Irish National Subjectivity at the Fin de Siècle. The Bucknell Review 38 (1): 25–43.Google Scholar
  21. Senf, Carol A. 1982. Dracula: Stoker’s Response to the New Woman. Victorian Studies 26 (1): 33–49.Google Scholar
  22. Smart, Robert A. 2013. Postcolonial Dread and the Gothic: Refashioning Identity in Sheridan Le Fanu’s Carmilla and Bram Stoker’s Dracula. In Transnational and Postcolonial Vampires, eds. Tabish Khair and Johan Höglund, 10–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
  23. Stoker, Bram. 1997. Dracula. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Twitchell, James. 1981. The Living Dead: A Study of the Vampire in Romantic Literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wall, Geoffrey. 1984. ‘Different from Writing’: Dracula in 1897. Literature and History 10 (1): 15–23.Google Scholar
  26. Weinstock, Jeffrey A. 1997. Virus Culture. Studies in Popular Culture 20 (1): 83–97. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23414603. Accessed 2 Oct 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversitySouthportAustralia

Personalised recommendations