Abstract
“She got her [business] degree online.” Many say this in hushed voices, as if it should be a secret. Others, more brazen in their assessment, place the same emphasis on the word “online” as if it were something without value, a mail-order trinket that could be obtained as easily as adding it to the shopping cart and paying for shipping and handling.
Despite these negative sentiments, the online environment is logistically the only option for many. Common reasons are to pursue a business degree while working and/or managing family responsibilities, the latter frequently gender-biased. These reasons applied to the author as well. At the time, she wanted to continue to work and her travel schedule was sporadic. In addition, family health issues needed support and were her priority.
While flexibility might be the impetus, three other aspects are equally important: the learning experience, the knowledge acquired, and the recognition from third parties. If the degree does not enable the student to be both prepared and eligible to pursue further graduate studies or improve earning capability, the cost – both in time and money – is unfounded.
The author will outline current opinions of the validity of online business education and the importance of accreditation. Following, she will provide her perspective of business education quality based on her experiences. This will support her opinion that a common set of standards and evaluation mechanisms would be beneficial in assisting students in their assessment of programs and in providing confidence that the value of online education can be not only equal to traditional brick-and-mortar institutions, but preferred.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Council of Europe. (2017). Indicator framework on culture and democracy (IFCD). Available http://www.coe.int/en/web/culture-and-heritage/indicators-culture-and-democracy. Accessed 18 Feb 2017.
GetEducated.com. (2016). List of accreditation agencies used by fake colleges. Available https://www.geteducated.com/college-degree-mills/204-fake-agencies-for-college-accreditation. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
Higher Learning Commission. (2017). How institutions are accredited. Available https://www.hlcommission.org/HLC-Institutions/how-institutions-are-accredited.html. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
Kerby, S., & Burns, C. (2012, July 12). The top 10 economic facts of diversity in the workplace. Available https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/news/2012/07/12/11900/the-top-10-economic-facts-of-diversity-in-the-workplace/. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
Milem, J. F. (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In M. Chang et al. (Eds.), Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in higher education (pp. 126–169). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Prepublication draft available http://web.stanford.edu/~hakuta/www/policy/racial_dynamics/Chapter5.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2017.
Outstanding Colleges. (2016, April 11). List of fake college accreditation agencies. Available http://www.outstandingcolleges.com/list-fake-college-accreditation-agencies/. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
Oxford Dictionaries. (2017). Accreditation. In: OxfordDictionaries.com. Available https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/accreditation. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
Ramussen College. (2014). Likelihood of hiring an online degree holder. [Survey]. Available http://www.rasmussen.edu/student-life/blogs/college-life/online-degrees-accepted-employers-survey-results/. Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
Saad, L., Busteed, B., & Ogisi, M. (2013, October 15). In: US, Online education rated best for value and options. Available Gallup: http://www.gallup.com/poll/165425/online-education-rated-best-value-options.aspx. Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
Society for Human Resource Management. (2010). Hiring practices and attitudes: Traditional vs. online degree credentials [SHRM Poll.] Available https://shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Pages/hiringpracticesandattitudes.aspx. Accessed 27 Dec 2016.
Taylor, P., Parker, K., Lenhart, A., & Patten, E. (2011). The digital revolution and higher education. Available Pew Research Center: http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/08/28/main-report-17/. Accessed 20 Dec 2016.
Universities Canada. (n.d.). Provincial quality assurance systems. Available http://www.univcan.ca/universities/quality-assurance/provincial-quality-assurance-systems/. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
World Heritage Encyclopedia. (2016). List of unrecognized higher education accreditation organizations. Available http://worldheritage.org/articles/List_of_unrecognized_higher_education_accreditation_organizations. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coble, D. (2018). Perspective: But It’s Online. In: Khare, A., Hurst, D. (eds) On the Line. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62776-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62776-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62775-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62776-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)