Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Educational Data Mining (EDM): Researching Impact on Online Business Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover On the Line

Abstract

Educational data mining (EDM) is an applied field of research that combines data mining, machine learning, and statistics in the educational setting at, but not limited to, schools, universities and intelligent tutoring systems, and MOOCs. Methods are developing and improving for analyzing the vast amount of data available in education to better understand learning behaviors and pedagogical outcomes by applying theories of educational psychology in order to improve the learning environment.

In this chapter, the authors explore the significance of data mining in the online education setting and how it can improve the student learning experience. We first review some commonly used data mining techniques that have been applied to education data, such as classification, clustering, and association rule mining. The new developments in knowledge tracing for modeling student data are also briefly described. We follow with an elaboration on the goals of educational data mining, for example, using the data related to student performance in an MOOC setting, some goals for data mining could be to predict how well the student will do on a new class activity or the probability of the student dropping the course. And we conclude with a look at how EDM applies to online business education and how learning systems can adapt to findings of this data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agarwal, S., Pandey, G. N., & Tiwari, M. D. (2012). Data mining in education: Data classification and decision tree approach. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(2), 140–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Barrak, M. A., & Al-Razgan, M. (2016). Predicting students final GPA using decision trees: A case study. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(7), 528–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C. J. (2010). Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S. J. D. (2010). Data mining for education. International encyclopedia of education, 7, 112–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. S., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J., Ostrow, K. & Wang, Y. (2016). Students vs. skills: Partitioning variance explained in learner models. Student modeling from different aspects, pp. 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. US Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, pp. 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2013). A data-assisted approach to supporting instructional interventions in technology enhanced learning environments (PhD dissertation). University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. M., Kuo, T. M. L., Chen, S. C., Li, C. A., Huang, Y. W., Cheng, Y. C., et al. (2016, July). Developing a data-driven learning interest recommendation system to promoting self-paced learning on MOOCs. In Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on (pp. 23–25). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Y. B., Segal, A., & Gal, Y. A. K. (2016, April). Sequencing educational content in classrooms using Bayesian knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 354–363). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, A., Aghabozrgi, S., Ismail, M. A. B., & Mahroeian, H. (2015). Clustering algorithms applied in educational data mining. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering, 5(2), 112–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanfarelli, J., & Vie, S. (2015). Medulla: A 2D sidescrolling platformer game that teaches basic brain structure and function. Well Played, 4(2), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, E., Romero, C., Ventura, S., & Calders, T. (2007). Drawbacks and solutions of applying association rule mining in learning management systems. In Proceedings of the international workshop on Applying Data Mining in e-Learning (ADML 2007), Crete, Greece, pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., & Cummins, F. (2000). Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural Computation, 12(10), 2451–2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Rai, D., Beck, J., & Heffernan, N. (2009). Does self-discipline impact students’ knowledge and learning? In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, Y., Wang, Y., Beck, J. (2016). How long must we spin our wheels? Analysis of student time and classifier inaccuracy. Student modeling from different aspects, pp. 32–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, F., & Atkinson, J. (2011). Adaptive feedback selection for intelligent tutoring systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 6146–6152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: Concepts and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-García, Á., González-González, I., Jiménez Zarco, A. I., & Chaparro-Peláez, J. (2016). Visualizations of online course interactions for social network learning analytics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(7), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochreiter, S. (1998). The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 6(02), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapa, E. (2007). Transfer from structured to open-ended problem solving in a computerized metacognitive environment. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 688–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K., Wang, Y., Thompson, T., &Heffernan, N. (2015). Defining mastery: Knowledge tracing versus N-consecutive correct responses. In The proceedings of the 8th international conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 630–631). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khajah, M., Lindsey, R. V., & Mozer, M.C. (2016). How deep is knowledge tracing?. In The proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 94–101). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. J. (2016). Predicting students’ problem solving performance using support vector machine. Journal of Data Science, 14, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Yang, J., Wu, Y., Li, C., & Zheng, L. (2016, April). Big data application in education: Dropout prediction in Edx MOOCs. In Multimedia Big Data (BigMM), 2016 IEEE second international conference on (pp. 440–443). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Liu, B., Wong, C. K., Yu, P. S., & Lee, S. M. (2000). Targeting the right students using data mining. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD’00, pp. 457–464, New York, USA, 2000. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacHardy, Z., & Pardos, Z. A. (2015). Evaluating the relevance of educational videos using BKT and big data. In the proceedings of the 8th international conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 424–427). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madhyastha, T., & Tanimoto, S. (2009). Student Consistency and implications for feedback in online assessment systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Educational Data Mining, pp 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. (2014). Exploring the ethical implications of MOOCs. Distance Education, 35(2), 250–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F., & Ndoye, A. (2016). Using learning analytics to assess student learning in online courses. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(3), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, W., Vail, A. K., Frankosky, M. H., Wiggins, J. B., Boyer, K. E., Wiebe, E. N., et al. (2016). Predicting dialogue acts for intelligent virtual agents with multimodal student interaction data. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 454–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A., & Ohlsson, S. (1999). Evaluation of a constraint-based tutor for a database language. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S., & Barrow, D. K. (2013). The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system. Computers & Education, 60(1), 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(4), 230–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, P. I., Cen, H., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009, July). Performance factors analysis – A new alternative to knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling (pp. 531–538). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piech, C., Bassen, J., Huang, J., Ganguli, S., Sahami, M., Guibas, L. J., & Sohl-Dickstein, J. (2015). Deep knowledge tracing. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 505–513).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S., Harris, T. K., Nixon, T., Dickison, D., Murray, R. C., & Towle, B. (2009). Reducing the knowledge tracing space. International Working Group on Educational Data Mining.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics: Part C – Applications & Reviews, 40(6), 601–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rus, V., Graesser, A., Moldovan, C., & Niraula, N. (2012). Automatic discovery of speech act categories in educational games. In The proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 25–32). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, Y. J., & Bryant, D. (2012). Multimedia CAI program for students with mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 33(4), 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G. (2010). What are learning analytics? Available http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/08/25/what-are-learning-analytics/. Accessed 8 Jan 2017.

  • Sweeney, M., Lester, J., & Rangwala, H. (2015, October). Next-term student grade prediction. In Big data (Big Data), 2015 IEEE international conference on (pp. 970–975). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, M., Rangwala, H., Lester, J., & Johri, A. (2016). Next-term student performance prediction: A recommender systems approach. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 8(1), 22–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Chen, L. (2016). A nonlinear state space model for identifying at-risk students in open online courses. In The proceedings of the 9th international conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 527–532). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Walker, E., & Wylie, R. (2016). Analyzing frequent sequential patterns of learning behaviors in concept mapping. EDM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. JEDM-Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, X., Zhao, S., Van Inwegen, E. G., & Beck, J. E. (2016). Going deeper with deep knowledge tracing. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2016) (pp. 545–550).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, B., Recker, M., Qi, X., Flann, N., & Ye, L. (2013). Clustering educational digital library usage data: Comparisons of latent class analysis and K-means algorithms. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(2), 38–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudelson, M. V., Medvedeva, O. P., & Crowley, R. S. (2008). A multifactor approach to student model evaluation. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(4), 349–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Shah, R., & Chi, M. (2016). Deep learning+ student modeling+ clustering: A recipe for effective automatic short answer grading. In The proceedings of the 9th international conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 562–567). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

    Kriti Khare

  2. Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Edmonton, Canada

    Helen Lam & Anshuman Khare

Authors
  1. Kriti Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen Lam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anshuman Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kriti Khare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Anshuman Khare

  2. Faculty of Business, Athabasca University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Deborah Hurst

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Khare, K., Lam, H., Khare, A. (2018). Educational Data Mining (EDM): Researching Impact on Online Business Education. In: Khare, A., Hurst, D. (eds) On the Line. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62776-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation