Abstract
“While the world has changed rapidly, the tax systems that support all levels of governments have largely stayed the same”. The quote from David Brunori (2003: 114) is largely right with regard to the overall BRICS tax systems, but not with regard to the property tax within the megacities. It seems as if there is a bottom-up movement originating from the megacities to adopt their own-tax system in order to meet their financial needs, which is expressed in property tax reforms across the megacities. These megacities are in particular facing changing economic and social environments. The megacities are in a state of constant flux—not only with regard to their population numbers, the quantity and quality of public amenities to be provided, and resulting complexity in service delivery, but also with regard to their property tax systems. In such a changing world, the fiscal framework provides megacities ideally with access to revenue sources that correspond with the powers and functions they are responsible for. Local public finance, more precisely, local public taxes, should link urban costs and benefits. However, finances often lag behind and have thereby a negative impact on the financial sustainability of municipalities, on the reliability and quality of municipal services, and municipalities’ contribution to supporting economic growth. In an urbanizing world, public finance is more important than ever before. Herewith, local tax systems, and especially property taxation, has to be in line with the changing local environment in order to offset the financial burdens megacities are facing. Therefore, reviewing the property tax systems in order to further evolve the local tax system is of urgent need.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Olson (1982) addresses special-interest groups striving for redistribution of income/resources rather than generating new income/resources.
References
BBMP (2015) Bengaluru: way forward. Expert Committee: BBMP Restructuring, June 2015
Brunori D (2003) Local tax policy: a federalist perspective. The Urban Institute Press, Washington, DC
Dillinger W (1991) Urban property tax reform: guidelines and recommendations. Urban Management and Municipal Finance, World Bank, Washington, DC
Glaeser E (2011) Triumph of the city. How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin Books, New York
Gramlich EM, Rubinfeld DL (1982) Micro estimates of public spending demand functions and tests of the Tiebout and median-voter hypotheses. J Polit Econ 90:536–560
IMF (2014) Revenue administration – gap analysis program (RA-GAP). Presentation held by David Kloeden, 5th IMF-Japan high-level tax conference for Asian countries, 21–23 Apr 2014
McLure CE Jr (ed) (1983) Tax assignment in federal states. Australian National University, Canberra
Olson M (1982) Rise and decline of nations. Yale University Press, New Haven
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salm, M. (2017). Summary and Way Forward. In: Property Tax in BRICS Megacities. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62671-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62671-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62670-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62671-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)