Skip to main content

Stakeholder Accountability Through the World Wide Web: Insights from Nonprofits

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Network, Smart and Open

Abstract

Accountability to stakeholders has always been pivotal in supporting nonprofit organizations in legitimizing their existence within local communities and building public trust. The development of Web-based accountability tools has offered growing possibilities to communicate and engage in dialogue with stakeholders. However, nonprofit organizations are not yet fully exploiting the potential of the Web. By focusing on Italian bank foundations, this study explores the use of the Web as a tool for discharging accounts to stakeholders and involving them in dialogue. The data show that most of the foundations do not use websites to communicate interactively with their stakeholders, and communication is limited to one-way disclosure of information. The results suggest more steps can be taken to ensure increased responsiveness to community needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hoque, Z., & Parker, L. (eds.). (2015). Performance management in nonprofit organizations: Global perspectives. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2013). Towards charity accountability: Narrowing the gap between provision and needs? Public Management Review, 15(7), 945–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.757349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, S., & Norton, H. E. (2004). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organizational goals? Public Relations Review, 30, 279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, A. M. (2009). The potential of Web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review, 35, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: Understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009341086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2012). Conceptualizing web-based stakeholder communication: The organizational website as a stakeholder relations tool. Communication & Science Journal, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leardini, C., Rossi, G., & Moggi, S. (2014). Board governance in bank foundations. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebrahim, A. (2010). The Many faces of nonprofit accountability. Harward Business School Working paper 10-069.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, R. L., & Blouin, M. C. (2014). Towards a model of web disclosure adoption by nonprofit organizations. Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1268&context=amcis2014.

  10. Gray, R. (2008). Social and environmental accounting and reporting: From ridicule to revolution? From hope to hubris?—A personal review of the field. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 2(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.22164/isea.v2i1.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Murtaza, N. (2012). Putting the lasts first: The case for community-focused and peer-managed NGO accountability mechanisms. Voluntas, 23, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9181-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Conway, S. L., O’Keefe, P. A., & Hrasky, S. L. (2015). Legitimacy, accountability and impression management in NGOs: the Indian Ocean tsunami. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1075–1098. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-01007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebrahim, A. (2009). Placing the normative logics of accountability in “Thick” perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(6), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764208327664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, M., & Warburton, D. (2003). Legitimacy and the role of UK third sector organizations in the policy process. Voluntas, 14(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025618720650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts, N. C. (2002). Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: Resolving the accountability paradox. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moggi, S., Leardini, C., & Rossi, G. (2015). Mandatory or not mandatory reporting? Insights from Italian bank foundations. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(10), 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.969842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Broadbent, J., Laughlin, R., & Willig-Atherton, H. (1994). Financial controls and schools: Accounting in ‘public’ and ‘private’ spheres. The British Accounting Review, 26(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1006/bare.1994.1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor, M., Kent, M. L., & White, W. J. (2001). How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27, 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(01)00086-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lovejoy, K., Waters, R. D., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Engaging stakeholders through Twitter: How nonprofit organizations are getting more out of 140 characters or less. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, R. L., & Bhattacherjee, A. (2011). A theoretical framework for strategic use of the web among nonprofit organizations. In: Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (pp. 103–108). Atlanta: Association of Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kent, M. L., Taylor, M., & White, W. J. (2003). The relationship between Web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00194-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ACRI. (2015). Ventesimo rapporto sulle Fondazioni di origine bancaria - Anno 2014. Rome: ACRI.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woodside, A. G. (2010). Case study research: Theory, methods. Practice: Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gina Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rossi, G., Moggi, S., Pierce, P., Leardini, C. (2018). Stakeholder Accountability Through the World Wide Web: Insights from Nonprofits. In: Lamboglia, R., Cardoni, A., Dameri, R., Mancini, D. (eds) Network, Smart and Open. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 24. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62636-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics