Skip to main content

Sustainability and Mining: The Case of the Kola Peninsula

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites

Abstract

This chapter discusses sustainability issues related to two mining companies – JSC “Apatit” and JSC “North-Western Phosphorous Company” – in the towns of Kirovsk and Apatity in the Murmansk region of Russia. These companies have been exploiting apatite-nepheline ore deposits in Khibiny, the largest mountain massif on the Kola Peninsula. The main question posed here is how knowledge about environmental, economic, cultural and social values decision making and knowledge systems are applied in decision making. A case study of Kirovsk and Apatity was undertaken to further understand the local planning regime and sustainability in Kirovsk and Apatity, including environmental integrity, indigenous groups and their subsistence economy, community benefits, effective engagement, and mining companies’ self-reporting on sustainability. The main challenges to sustainable mining are identified for the three major stakeholder groups – mining companies, local communities, and government authorities. The chapter concludes that perceptions of sustainable development in these Russian industrial towns are shaped by the dominant role mining industry plays on the Kola Peninsula in influencing the quality of life of local people and their perceptions of environmental concerns, including questions of pollution and landscape aesthetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Perestroika means restructuring and was together with glasnost (openness) central concepts in the USSR political and economic reform process in the 1980s.

  2. 2.

    Federal Agency on Subsoil Use (under the Ministry of natural resources and ecology).

References

  • Acron. (2016). Acron homepage. Retrieved 17 Feb 2016, from http://www.acron.ru/en/sustainability/environment/.

  • Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E., & Wollenberg, E. (2008). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. R., Berkes, F., Dale, A., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21, 995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. A., & Vancley, F. (2003). The international handbook of social impact assessment – conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier, R.G., Thomson, I. (2011). Modeling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Social license.com. Retrieved 17 Feb 2016 from http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf.

  • Burdge, R. J. (2002). Why is social impact assessment the orphan of the assessment process? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20, 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, J., & Rodgers, P. (2012). Sustainable development in the Russia Federation: The limits of greening within industrial firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(3), 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decree. (2014). Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 2907.2014. No. 1398-r. Retrieved 17 Mar 2015, from http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102356578&intelsearch=%F0%E0%F1%EF%EE%F0%FF%E6%E5%ED%E8%E5+%EF%F0%E0%E2%E8%F2%E5%EB%FC%F1%F2%E2%E0+%D0%D4+%EE%F2+2907.2014+%B9+1398-%F0.

  • Didyk, V. (2015). Development challenges for a single-industry mining town in the Russian Arctic: The case of Kirovsk, Murmansk Region. Russian Analytical Digest, 172, 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gushchina I. A., Polozhentseva O. A. (2012). Material and social well-beings factors of social adaptation of mono-towns’ population//“ The North and the Market: Forming the Economic Order”. 2012. No.2, p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovik, S., Sandström, C., & Zachrisson, A. (2010). Management of protected areas in Norway and Sweden: Challenges in combining central governance and local participation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iakovleva, T., Bay-Larsen, I., Kharitonova, G., & Didyk, V. (2012). Entrepreneurship and sustainability in nature-based tourism: The role of institutional profiles in Northern Norway and Northwest Russia. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 25(4), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirovsk. (2011). Kirovsk municipality: “Strategy of socio-economic development of the Kirovsk municipality up to year of 2020”. Approved by decision of Council of deputies as of 20.12.2011. No. 85. Retrieved 13 Apr 2015, from http://kirovsk.ru/files/npa/sovet/2011/85/strateg_2020.pdf.

  • Koivurova, T., Buanes, A., Riabova, L., Didyk, V., Ejdemo, T., Poelzer, G., & Taavo, P. (2015). “Social license to operate”: A relevant term in northern European mining? Polar Geography, 38(3), 194–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, K., Buanes, A., Koivorova, T., Masloboev, V., & Petterson, P. (2015). Sustainable mining, local communities and environmental regulation. Barents Studies: Peoples, Economics and Politics, 2(1), 50–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockie, S., Franetovich, M., & Sharma, S. (2008). Democratisation versus engagement? Social and economic impact assessment and community participation in the coal mining industry of the Bowen Basin, Australia. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26, 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martus, E. (2016). Contested policymaking in Russia: Industry, environment, and the “best available technology” debate. Post-Soviet Affairs, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEM. (2016). Mining: part of sustainable development in British Columbia. Canada: The Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) and the Mining Association of British Columbia (MABC). Retrieved from http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/mining/sustainability/Pages/default.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mironov, A. (2015). The truth about the six million dollars. Khibinskiy Vestnik, 15, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Municipalities of the Murmansk region. (2014). Statistical yearbook. Murmanskstat – Territorial body of the Federal Service of state statistics in Murmansk region, Murmansk, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • NWPC. (2016). North-Western phosphorous company homepage. Retrieved 17 Feb 2016 from http://www.szfk.ru/en/.

  • Nystén-Haarala, S., Klyuchnikova, E., & Helenius, H. (2015). Law and self-regulation: Substitutes or complements in gaining social acceptance? Resources Policy, 45, 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2017). Shaping projects, shaping impacts: Community-controlled impact assessments and negotiated agreements. Third World Quarterly, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, J. (2002). Russian environmentalism. European Environment, 12, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PhosAgro. (2016). PhosAgro homepage. Retrieved 17 Feb 2016 from https://www.phosagro.com/about/holding/item636.php.

  • Prno, J. (2013). An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social license to operate in the mining industry. Resources Policy, 4, 577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riabova L., Didyk V. (2014). Social license to operate for mining companies in the Russian Arctic: Two cases in the Murmansk region. Briefing note. ArcticYearbook2014. Http://www.arcticyearbook.com/index.php/briefingnotes2014/120-social-license-to-operate-for-mining-companies-in-the-russian-arctic-two-cases-in-the-murmansk-region.

  • Riabova, L.A., Didyk, V.V. (2015). Sotsial’maya litsenziya na deyatel’nost’ resursodobyvayushchikh kompaniy kak novyi instrument munitsipal’nogo razvitiya [Social license to operate for the resource extraction companies as a new instrument of municipal development]. Public Administration Issues, Moscow, (3), 61–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. (2007). Resource regimes and cooperation. Land Use Policy, 24, 624–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vik, J., Bay-Larsen, I., & Aasetre, J. (2011). Bruk og vern -brytninger om demokrati. In M. S. Haugen & E. P. Stræte (Eds.), Rurale brytninger (pp. 180–202). Trondheim: Tapir forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voytekhovskiy YU. L., Miroshnichenko, T. A. (2014). ABCG heritage – Arctic biological, cultural and geological heritage and FODD – Fennoscandian Ore Deposit Database. Case studies of international cooperation in the Arctic zone. Vestnik of the Kola Science Centre of RAS, (2), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. (1987). Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webler, T. (1995). “Right” discourse in citizens participation: An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizens participation -evaluating models for environmental discourse. London: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (2016). What is the social licence to operate? Local perceptions of oil and gas projects in Russia’s Komi Republic and Sakhalin Island. Extractive industries and Society, 3, 73–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Bay-Larsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Didyk, V., Bay-Larsen, I., Sandersen, H., Ivanova, L., Isaeva, L., Kharitonova, G. (2018). Sustainability and Mining: The Case of the Kola Peninsula. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics