Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to investigate how three Arctic municipalities affected by mining projects use metagovernance tools to explore, construct and manage interdependent relations with mining companies. The existence of interdependency is a basic premise of governance networks. However, the current debates about governance networks have paid scant attention to how such interdependency actually comes into existence and how network participants can maintain interdependent relations over time. The chapter highlights the differences between the strategies employed by the three municipalities. While two of them resort to highly interventionist methods and participate actively in the dominant governance networks, the third municipality mainly applies hands-off strategies focused on facilitation. The findings show that interdependency is a multifaceted and changeable phenomenon, which different parties can construct and manipulate. In order to do so, institutional designs that facilitate negotiated interaction between the parties are important. The parties must meet in order to explore win-win opportunities. These insights contribute to a better understanding of how municipal actors can contribute to more sustainable development in local communities hosting mining projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aarsæther, N. (2010). A quest for control: The transformation of resource-based places in the Nordic periphery. In T. W. Dunk (Ed.), Transitions in marginal zones in the age of globalization: Case studies from the North and South (pp. 95–111). Thunder Bay: Lakehead University, Centre for Northern Studies.
Aarsæther, N., & Bærenholdt, J. O. (2001). Transforming the local: Coping strategies and regional policies. (2001 (Vol. 25). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 11(3), 295–326.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. (2011). Norway: The decline of subnational democracy? In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe (pp. 282–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bell, S., & Park, A. (2006). The problematic metagovernance of networks: Water reform in New South Wales. Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 63–83. doi:10.1017/S0143814X06000432.
Bukve, O. (2012). Lokal og regional styring: eit institiusjonelt perspektiv. Oslo: Samlaget.
Carrington, K., & Pereira, M. (2011). Assessing the social impacts of the resources boom on rural communities.(Report). Rural Society, 21(1), 2.
Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.
Cheshire, L. (2010). A corporate responsibility? The constitution of fly-in, fly-out mining companies as governance partners in remote, mine-affected localities. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 12–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.06.005.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Dale, B. (2002). An institutionalist approach to local restructuring: The case of four Norwegian mining towns. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/096977640200900101.
Eskelinen, H., & Snickars, F. (1995). Competitive Europeans peripheries? An introduction. In H. Eskelinen & F. Snickars (Eds.), Competitive European peripheries (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Springer.
Fauchald, O. K. (2014). Regulating environmental impacts of mining in Norway. Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, 2014(2), 53–65.
Fudenberg, D. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Haley, S., Klick, M., Szymoniak, N., & Crow, A. (2011). Observing trends and assessing data for Arctic mining. Polar Geography, 34(1–2), 37–61. doi:10.1080/1088937X.2011.584449.
Haveri, A., Nyholm, I., Roiseland, A. R., & Vabo, I. (2009). Governing collaboration: Practices of meta-governance in Finnish and Norwegian local governments. Local Government Studies, 35(5), 539–556. doi:10.1080/03003930903227360.
Hayter, R. (2000). Single industry resource towns. In E. S. Trevor, & J. Barnes (Eds.), The companion to economic geography. London: Wiley Publishers.
Heikkinen, H. I., Lépy, É., Sarkki, S., & Komu, T. (2016). Challenges in acquiring a social licence to mine in the globalising Arctic. The Polar Record, 52(4), 399–411. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0032247413000843.
Hertting, N. (2007). Mechanisms of governance network formation – a contextual rational choice perspective. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 43–60). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hovik, S., & Vabo, S. I. (2005). Norwegian local councils as democratic meta-governors? A study of networks established to manage cross-border natural resources. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 257–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00132.x.
Jones, B. D., & Bachelor, L. W. (1993). The sustaining hand : Community leadership and corporate power (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Kantor, P., & Turok, I. (2012). The politics of urban growth and decline. In K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 468–485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kemp, D. (2010). Community relations in the global mining industry: Exploring the internal dimensions of externally orientated work. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/csr.195.
Kemp, D., & Owen, J. R. (2013). Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business”. Resources Policy, 38(4), 523.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage Publications.
Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2), 135–158. doi:10.1080/14719030000000007.
Koivurova, T., Buanes, A., Riabova, L., Didyk, V., Ejdemo, T., Poelzer, G., … Lesser, P. (2015). ‘Social license to operate’: A relevant term in Northern European mining? Polar Geography, 38(3), 194–227. doi:10.1080/1088937X.2015.1056859.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
Lidström, A. (2011). Sweden: Party-dominated subnational democracy under challenge. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe (pp. 261–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
Nygaard, V. (2015). Do indigenous interests have a say in planning of new mining projects? Experiences from Finnmark, Norway. The Extractive Industries and Society. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.009
Nyseth, T., & Waldenström, C. (2007). Governing place reinvention: Obstacles and challenges. In T. Nyseth & B. Granås (Eds.), Place reinvention in the North (pp. 131–146). Stockholm: Nordregio.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pierre, J. (2015). Whose city is this anyway? Tensions in urban governance, good and otherwise. In L. van den Dool, F. Hendriks, A. Gianoli, & L. Schaap (Eds.), The quest for good urban governance: Theoretical reflections and international practices (pp. 29–44). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2012). Urban governance. In K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 71–86). New York: Oxford University Press.
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002.
Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, territory, identity: Politics of West European peripheries. London: Sage.
Sørensen, E. (2007a). Local politicians and administrators as metagovernors. In M. Marcussen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Democratic network governance in Europe (pp. 89–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Sørensen, E. (2007). Theoretical approaches to metagovernance. In E. Sørensen, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 169–182). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. (Report). Public Administration, 87(2), 234.
Stetson, G., & Mumme, S. (2016). Sustainable development in the Bering Strait: Indigenous values and the challenge of collaborative governance. Society & Natural Resources, 29(7), 791–806. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1080340.
Storey, K. (2001). Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: Mining and regional development in Western Australia. Australian Geographer, 32(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/00049180120066616.
Suopajärvi, L., Poelzer, G. A., Ejdemo, T., Klyuchnikova, E., Korchak, E., & Nygaard, V. (2016). Social sustainability in northern mining communities: A study of the European North and Northwest Russia. Resources Policy, 47, 61–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.004.
Tennberg, M., Vola, J., Espiritu, A. A., Fors, B. S., Ejdemo, T., Riabova, L., … Nosova, T. (2014). Neoliberal governance, sustainable development and local communities in the Barents Region. Barents Studies: Peoples, 1(1), 41.
Torfing, J. (2012). Governance networks. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 99–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Torfing, J., & Sørensen, E. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.
Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
Vabo, S. I., & Røiseland, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(14), 934–946. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.691243.
Viken, A., & Nyseth, T. (2009). Kirkenes – a town for miners and ministers. In T. Nyseth & A. Viken (Eds.), Place reinvention: Northern perspectives (pp. 53–72). Farnham: Ashgate.
Wilson, L. J. (2004). Riding the resource roller coaster: Understanding socioeconomic differences between mining communities. Rural Sociology, 69(2), 261–281.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bjørgo, F. (2018). Metagoverning the Interdependence of Municipalities and Mining Companies in the Scandinavian Arctic. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62608-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62610-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)