Skip to main content

Metagoverning the Interdependence of Municipalities and Mining Companies in the Scandinavian Arctic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites

Part of the book series: Springer Polar Sciences ((SPPS))

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to investigate how three Arctic municipalities affected by mining projects use metagovernance tools to explore, construct and manage interdependent relations with mining companies. The existence of interdependency is a basic premise of governance networks. However, the current debates about governance networks have paid scant attention to how such interdependency actually comes into existence and how network participants can maintain interdependent relations over time. The chapter highlights the differences between the strategies employed by the three municipalities. While two of them resort to highly interventionist methods and participate actively in the dominant governance networks, the third municipality mainly applies hands-off strategies focused on facilitation. The findings show that interdependency is a multifaceted and changeable phenomenon, which different parties can construct and manipulate. In order to do so, institutional designs that facilitate negotiated interaction between the parties are important. The parties must meet in order to explore win-win opportunities. These insights contribute to a better understanding of how municipal actors can contribute to more sustainable development in local communities hosting mining projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarsæther, N. (2010). A quest for control: The transformation of resource-based places in the Nordic periphery. In T. W. Dunk (Ed.), Transitions in marginal zones in the age of globalization: Case studies from the North and South (pp. 95–111). Thunder Bay: Lakehead University, Centre for Northern Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aarsæther, N., & Bærenholdt, J. O. (2001). Transforming the local: Coping strategies and regional policies. (2001 (Vol. 25). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 11(3), 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldersheim, H., & Rose, L. (2011). Norway: The decline of subnational democracy? In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe (pp. 282–304). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Park, A. (2006). The problematic metagovernance of networks: Water reform in New South Wales. Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), 63–83. doi:10.1017/S0143814X06000432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukve, O. (2012). Lokal og regional styring: eit institiusjonelt perspektiv. Oslo: Samlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., & Pereira, M. (2011). Assessing the social impacts of the resources boom on rural communities.(Report). Rural Society, 21(1), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciaro, T., & Piskorski, M. J. (2005). Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(2), 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, L. (2010). A corporate responsibility? The constitution of fly-in, fly-out mining companies as governance partners in remote, mine-affected localities. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(1), 12–20. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.06.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, B. (2002). An institutionalist approach to local restructuring: The case of four Norwegian mining towns. European Urban and Regional Studies, 9(1), 5–20. doi:10.1177/096977640200900101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskelinen, H., & Snickars, F. (1995). Competitive Europeans peripheries? An introduction. In H. Eskelinen & F. Snickars (Eds.), Competitive European peripheries (pp. 1–14). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fauchald, O. K. (2014). Regulating environmental impacts of mining in Norway. Nordisk Miljörättslig Tidskrift, 2014(2), 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, S., Klick, M., Szymoniak, N., & Crow, A. (2011). Observing trends and assessing data for Arctic mining. Polar Geography, 34(1–2), 37–61. doi:10.1080/1088937X.2011.584449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveri, A., Nyholm, I., Roiseland, A. R., & Vabo, I. (2009). Governing collaboration: Practices of meta-governance in Finnish and Norwegian local governments. Local Government Studies, 35(5), 539–556. doi:10.1080/03003930903227360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, R. (2000). Single industry resource towns. In E. S. Trevor, & J. Barnes (Eds.), The companion to economic geography. London: Wiley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, H. I., Lépy, É., Sarkki, S., & Komu, T. (2016). Challenges in acquiring a social licence to mine in the globalising Arctic. The Polar Record, 52(4), 399–411. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0032247413000843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertting, N. (2007). Mechanisms of governance network formation – a contextual rational choice perspective. In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 43–60). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hovik, S., & Vabo, S. I. (2005). Norwegian local councils as democratic meta-governors? A study of networks established to manage cross-border natural resources. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 257–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00132.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Bachelor, L. W. (1993). The sustaining hand : Community leadership and corporate power (2nd ed.). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, P., & Turok, I. (2012). The politics of urban growth and decline. In K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 468–485). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D. (2010). Community relations in the global mining industry: Exploring the internal dimensions of externally orientated work. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 1–14. doi:10.1002/csr.195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D., & Owen, J. R. (2013). Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business”. Resources Policy, 38(4), 523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2), 135–158. doi:10.1080/14719030000000007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koivurova, T., Buanes, A., Riabova, L., Didyk, V., Ejdemo, T., Poelzer, G., … Lesser, P. (2015). ‘Social license to operate’: A relevant term in Northern European mining? Polar Geography, 38(3), 194–227. doi:10.1080/1088937X.2015.1056859.

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, A. (2011). Sweden: Party-dominated subnational democracy under challenge. In J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, & A. Lidström (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of local and regional democracy in Europe (pp. 261–281). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political-economic systems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, V. (2015). Do indigenous interests have a say in planning of new mining projects? Experiences from Finnmark, Norway. The Extractive Industries and Society. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.009

  • Nyseth, T., & Waldenström, C. (2007). Governing place reinvention: Obstacles and challenges. In T. Nyseth & B. Granås (Eds.), Place reinvention in the North (pp. 131–146). Stockholm: Nordregio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (2015). Whose city is this anyway? Tensions in urban governance, good and otherwise. In L. van den Dool, F. Hendriks, A. Gianoli, & L. Schaap (Eds.), The quest for good urban governance: Theoretical reflections and international practices (pp. 29–44). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2012). Urban governance. In K. Mossberger, S. E. Clarke, & P. John (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of urban politics (pp. 71–86). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy, 37(3), 346–357. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (1983). Economy, territory, identity: Politics of West European peripheries. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2007a). Local politicians and administrators as metagovernors. In M. Marcussen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Democratic network governance in Europe (pp. 89–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. (2007). Theoretical approaches to metagovernance. In E. Sørensen, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 169–182). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. (Report). Public Administration, 87(2), 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetson, G., & Mumme, S. (2016). Sustainable development in the Bering Strait: Indigenous values and the challenge of collaborative governance. Society & Natural Resources, 29(7), 791–806. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1080340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, K. (2001). Fly-in/fly-out and fly-over: Mining and regional development in Western Australia. Australian Geographer, 32(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/00049180120066616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suopajärvi, L., Poelzer, G. A., Ejdemo, T., Klyuchnikova, E., Korchak, E., & Nygaard, V. (2016). Social sustainability in northern mining communities: A study of the European North and Northwest Russia. Resources Policy, 47, 61–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2015.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennberg, M., Vola, J., Espiritu, A. A., Fors, B. S., Ejdemo, T., Riabova, L., … Nosova, T. (2014). Neoliberal governance, sustainable development and local communities in the Barents Region. Barents Studies: Peoples, 1(1), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (2012). Governance networks. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 99–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., & Sørensen, E. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance. Oxford: OUP Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vabo, S. I., & Røiseland, A. (2012). Conceptualizing the tools of government in urban network governance. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(14), 934–946. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.691243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viken, A., & Nyseth, T. (2009). Kirkenes – a town for miners and ministers. In T. Nyseth & A. Viken (Eds.), Place reinvention: Northern perspectives (pp. 53–72). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L. J. (2004). Riding the resource roller coaster: Understanding socioeconomic differences between mining communities. Rural Sociology, 69(2), 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frode Bjørgo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bjørgo, F. (2018). Metagoverning the Interdependence of Municipalities and Mining Companies in the Scandinavian Arctic. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics