Abstract
This chapter seek to frame different relevant theoretical concepts that are currently used to shed light on the question of sustainable development as it relates to mining. It elaborates upon multiple conceptual and theoretical frameworks that are employed throughout the chapters in this volume, and the relationships between them. Our analysis of mining within a sustainable development framework requires a complex set of theoretical understandings and concepts. These are discussed here in order to provide a foundation for the analytical chapters that follow. The basic concepts analysed in this volume are ‘sustainability in mining’, ‘sacrifice zones’ and ‘legitimacy’. Implicit in our analysis is the understanding that mining communities and mining projects need to deal with the complex understanding and valuation of landscapes and nature. This complexity can, of course, be understood by applying a number of different theories, of which we will present only a few. Some common threads that emerge from these different theoretical approaches include the importance of effective communication, the need to incorporate, acknowledge and understand diverse forms of knowledge, and the fact that legitimacy can be established in many different ways. This chapter, then, explores some of these perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See for instance the Arctic council’s “Ottawa Declaration” from1996.
- 2.
The project ARCTICFRONT, financed by the Norwegian Research Council.
- 3.
In short, social capital is related to social networks and closeness to existing power structures, while cultural capital can be linked to various elements such as knowledge, political competence and education. Economic capital is related to aspects such as income and land ownership.
- 4.
Some of these initiatives are in particular IRMA (The Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance), EITI (The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative), ICMM (The International Council of Mining and Metals), but also various CSR initiatives and certification schemes, the Responsible Jewellery Council, World Gold Council, etc.
References
Aase, T. H., & Fossåskaret, E. (2010). Skapte virkeligheter -om produksjon og tolking av kvalitative data. Oslo: Oslo Universitetsforlaget.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: are they related. Progress in Human Geography, 24, 347–364.
Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future in. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(2005), 21–34.
Arctic Council. (1996). Ottawa declaration – declaration on the establishment of the arctic council, Ottawa, Canada. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0025-326X(13)00291-9/h0005
Asdal, K. (2005). Returning the kingdom to the king: A post-constructivist response to the critique of positivism. Acta Sociologica, 48(3), 253–261.
Berg, B. L. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson.
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bjørst, L.-R. (2016). Saving or destroying the local community? Conflicting spatial storylines in the Greenlandic debate on uranium. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 34–40
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Forms of capital. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press.
Brox, O. (1984). Nord-Norge: Fra allmenning til koloni, Universitetsforlaget.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations on Environment and Development, United Nations.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as a narrative. Social Research, 54, 12–32.
Buchanan, A. (2002). Political legitimacy and democracy. Ethics, 112(4), 689–719.
Buchanan, A. E. (2007). Justice, legitimacy, and self-determination: moral foundations for international law. Oxford: University Press on Demand.
Bullard, R. D., & Johnson, G. S. (2000). Environmentalism and public policy: Environmental justice: Grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 555–578.
Buxton, A. (2014). Governments, large- and small-scale mining: Beginning a dialogue. Report back from Indaba Mining Conference. London: IIED.
Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, Just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312
Carrington, K., & Pereira, M. (2011). Assessing the social impacts of the resources boom on rural communities. Rural Society, 21(1), 2–20.
Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance, 15(4), 503–529.
Clarke, W. C., et al. (2002). Information and influence: How institutions mediate the impact of scientific assessments on global environmental affairs. Faculty research working paper series, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 02-044.
Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12(3), 259–278.
Dale, B. (2012). Securing a contingent future: how threats, risks and identity matter in the debate over petroleum development in Lofoten, Norway. Norway: Univeristy of Tromsoe
Dale, B. (2016). Governing resources, governing mentalities: The case of petroleum in the lofoten seas. Journal of Extractive Industries and Society, 3, 9–16.
Daniels, S., & Endfield, G. H. (2009). Narratives of climate change: Introduction. Journal of Historical Geography, 35(2), 215–222. doi:10.1016/j.jhg.2008.09.005.
Davis, M. (1993). Davis, Mike. Dead West: Ecocide in Marlboro Country. New Left Review, 200, 49–73.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality. Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.
Endres, D. (2012). Sacred land or national sacrifice zone: The role of values in the Yucca Mountain participation process. Environmental Communication, 6(3), 328–345.
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Brighton: Harvester Press.
Fox, J. (1999). Mountaintop removal in West Virginia: An environmental sacrifice zone. Organization & Environment, 12(2), 163–183.
Hannigan, J. (2006). Environmental sociology. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Hedges, C., & Sacco, J. (2012). In C. Hedges & J. Sacco (Eds.), Days of destruction, days of revolt. New York: Nation Books.
Held, D. (1987). Models of democracy (p. 238). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hogl, K., Kvarda, E., Nordbeck, R., et al. (2012). Effectiveness and legitimacy of environmental governance -synposis and key insights. In K. Hogl, E. Kvarda, R. Nordbeck, & M. Pregernig (Eds.), Environmental governance: The challenge of legitimacy and effectiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hough, P. (2013). International politics of the arctic: Coming in from the cold. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hovelsrud, G., et al. (2011). Arctic societies, cultures, and peoples in a changing cryosphere. Ambio, 40(1), 100–110.
ICLEI (1996). The local agenda 21 planning guide (Toronto).
IIED (2002). Breaking new ground: Mining, minerals and sustainable development from the project Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development IIED 2002.
Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology, 25(2), 152–174. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/124811.
Ingold, T.. 2011(2000). The temporality of landscapes. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The perception of the environment (pp. 189–208). London: Routledge.
Jentoft, S. (2000). Legitimacy and disappointment in Fishery policy Marine Policy 24/2000
Kirsch, S. (1997). Watching the bombs go off: Photography, nuclear landscapes, and spectator democracy. Antipode, 29(3), 227–255.
Kirsch, S. (2010). Sustainable mining. Dialectical Anthropology, 34(1), 87–93.
Kuletz, V. (1998). The tainted desert: Environmental ruin in the American West. Routledge: Psychology Press.
Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities: Technology, environment, social justice. London: Earthscan.
Lerner, S. (2010). Sacrifice zones: The front lines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McIntosh, R. J., et al. (2000). The way the wind blows: Climate, history, and human action. New York: Columbia University Press.
Murphy, K. (2012). The social pillar of sustainable development: A literature review and framework for policy analysis. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8(1), 15–29. Published online Mar 13, 2012.
Parekh, B. (2008). A new politics of identity: Political principles for an interdependent world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paschen, J. A., & Ison, R. (2014). Narrative research in climate change adaptation – Exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance. Research Policy, 43(6), 1083–1092.
Peter, F. (2010). Political legitimacy. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL= http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/legitimacy/. 2016.10.03.
Prno, J. (2013). An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resources Policy, 38(4), 577–590.
Robertson, I., & Richards, P. (Eds.). (2003). Studying cultural landscapes. London: Arnold.
Salmi, O. (2008). Drivers for adopting environmental management systems in the post-Soviet mining industry. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(1), 51–77.
Scott, R. R. (2010). Removing mountains: Extracting nature and identity in the Appalachian coalfields. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Skorstad, B. (2005). Miljø, kunnskap og moral. In Tre casestudiar av miljøomsyn. Tromsoe: Universitetet i Tromsoe.
Smelror, M. (2016). Preface. In Boyd et al (Eds.), Mineral resources in the arctic geological survey of Norway.
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Turner, B. L., et al. (2003). Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: Three case studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8080–8085.
UN. (2001). Information for decision-making and participation E/CN.17/2001/19. 9th session of the Commission on Sustainable Development: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=2002&nr=51&menu=35 (12.11.2016).
Wilson, D. C. (2010). Paradoxes of transparency -science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe (p. 301). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wilson, E. (2016). What is the social licence to operate? Local perceptions of oil and gas projects in Russia’s Komi Republic and Sakhalin Island. The Extractive Industries and Society, Elsevier, 3(1), 73–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skorstad, B., Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I. (2018). Governing Complexity. Theories, Perspectives and Methodology for the Study of Sustainable Development and Mining in the Arctic. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62608-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62610-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)