Towards Outsourced and Individual Service Consumption Clearing in Connected Mobility Solutions

  • Michael StrasserEmail author
  • Sahin Albayrak
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 740)


The work on hand targets the missing capabilities for data access and service clearing in connected mobility service solutions. Interviewed experts pointed out that current solutions of the mobility domain lack appropriate clearing capabilities as well as access on internally processed data. We approach both limitations and elaborate a message protocol and respective interfaces which enables participants of a service solution to outsource their clearing process individually. The design of the interfaces and the message protocol are discussed. Its feasibility is justified with the help of an additionally developed clearing service prototype. This prototype uses the interfaces in an automated fashion and calculates the costs for a set of transactions in accordance to a given contract. The presented interfaces and message protocol support service solution developers in their development of new marketplace capabilities demanded by participants. What kind of clearing might be applicable in an ecosystem of interconnected marketplaces is furthermore discussed. The work on hand closes the gap of limited data access and service clearing. The findings of this work can be used as a foundation for a standard regarding service clearing or any other use case that requires access on internal marketplace data.


  1. 1.
    Thitimajshima, W., Esichaikul, V., Krairit, D.: Developing a conceptual framework to evaluate public B2B E-marketplaces. In: Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems 2015 (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Strasser, M., Albayrak, S.: The Current Situation and future trends of marketplaces for mobility services : findings from qualitative expert interviews. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems (SMARTGREENS), pp. 21–31 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strasser, M., Albayrak, S.: Conceptual architecture for self-discovering in fragmented service systems. In: 7th International Confrence on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), pp. 1–5 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strasser, M.: Roaming von Echtzeitdaten innerhalb eines Kollektivs von Mobilitätsanbietern und -nutzern: Architektur eines Cloud basierten Marktplatzes für Serviceleistungen im Ökosystem. In: Kolloquium Das neue Auto - elektrisch, automatisiert und vernetzt (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Strasser, M., Weiner, N., Albayrak, S.: Individual service clearing as a business service : a capable reference solution for B2B mobility marketplaces. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science (CLOSER), pp. 27–38 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grieger, M.: Electronic marketplaces: a literature review and a call for supply chain management research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144, 280–294 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ågerfalk, P., Bannon, L., Fitzgerald, B.: Action in Language. Operational Research Society, Organisations and Information Systems (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Legner, C.: Is there a market for web services? In: Nitto, E., Ripeanu, M. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4907, pp. 29–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-93851-4_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heinrich, B., Huber, A., Zimmermann, S.: Make-and-sell or buy of web services. In: 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buchinger, U., Lindmark, S., Braet, O.: Business model scenarios for an open service platform for multi-modal electric vehicle sharing. In: The second International Conference on Smart Systems, Devices and Technologies, SMART 2013, pp. 7–14 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J.K., Liang, T.-P., Turban, D.C.: Business-to-business e-commerce. Electronic Commerce. STBE, pp. 161–207. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10091-3_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghenniwa, H., Huhns, M.N., Shen, W.: eMarketplaces for enterprise and cross enterprise integration. Data Knowl. Eng. 52, 33–59 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, M.: Critical success factors for B2B e-markets: a strategic fit perspective. Mark. Intel. Plan. 31, 337–366 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balocco, R., Perego, A., Perotti, S.: B2b eMarketplaces Aclassification framework to analyse business models and critical success factors. Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 110, 1117–1137 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pfeiffer, A., Bach, M.: An E-clearinghouse for energy and infrastructure services in e-mobility. In: Helber, S., Breitner, M., Rösch, D., Schön, C., Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-M., Sibbertsen, P., Steinbach, M., Weber, S., Wolter, A. (eds.) Operations Research Proceedings 2012. ORP, pp. 303–308. Springer, Cham (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-00795-3_44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rust, R.T., Zahorik, A.J.: Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market share. J. Retail. 69, 193–215 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Buyya, R., Yeo, C., Venugopal, S.: Market-oriented cloud computing: vision, hype, and reality for delivering it services as computing utilities. In: Proceedings - 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, HPCC 2008, pp. 5–13. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strasser, M., Albayrak, S.: Smart city reference model: interconnectivity for on-demand user to service authentication. Int. J. Suppl. Oper. Manage. 3, 1126–1142 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luttge, K.: E-Charging API: outsource charging to a payment service provider. In: 2001 Intelligent Network Workshop, pp. 216–222. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vidal, N., Iaarakkers, J., Marques, R., Scuro, P., Caleno, F., Matrose, C., Bolczek, M.: Report on Billing and stakeholders architecture and ICTs recommendations. Technical report 241295, G4V (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strasser, M., Albayrak, S.: A pattern based feasibility study of cloud computing for smart mobility solutions. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Resilient Networks Design and Modeling (RNDM), pp. 332–338. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strasser, M., Mauser, D., Albayrak, S.: Mitigating traffic problems by integrating smart parking solutions into an interconnected ecosystem. In: The twenty first IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, pp. 38–43 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bosch Software Innovations GmbHBerlinGermany
  2. 2.DAI LaboratoryTechnical University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations