Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Options and Prospects for a Global Low-Carbon Transition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of the Low-Carbon Transition

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

Humanity faces a stark option: revolutionary transformation or potential collapse and social disintegration. This chapter explores prospects for choosing benign pathways over the latter. It begins by summarising the argument of the book and then focuses on how more robust political economy approaches can be fostered, looking at the role of the state, its relationship to market actors and the essential need for an activist civil society, within guardrails of justice and social ethics. Section three examines what could be done to keep to the pathways laid out in the face of setbacks and obstacles such as the election of Trump in the US. It also examines the conditions being created by the Paris Agreement and what can be done to strengthen the resilience of the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anand, S., and A. Sen. 2000. Human Development and Economic Sustainability. World Development 28 (12): 2029–2049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. 2012. Climate Change Going Beyond Dangerous—Brutal Numbers and Tenuous Hope. Development Dialogue 61: 16–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., and A. Bows. 2010. A 2°C Target? Get Real, Because 4°C is on its Way. Parliamentary Brief 13 (2): 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audet, R. 2014. The Double Hermeneutic of Sustainability Transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 11: 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., and P. Ekins. 2004. The Costs of Kyoto for the US Economy. The Energy Journal 25: 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky, Anthony D., and Elizabeth A. Hadly. 2016. End Game: Tipping Point for Planet Earth? London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. 2014. Building Sustainability through Greater Happiness. The Economic and Labour Relations Review 25 (4): 587–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, D. 2016. Green Initiative Will Not Leave Footprint on Economy. Swissinfo. Accessed 29 July 2017. https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/september-25-vote_footprint-of-green-initiative-on-swiss-economy-/42465734

  • Burkett, Paul. 2006. Two Stages of Ecosocialism? Implications of Some Neglected Analyses of Ecological Conflict and Crisis. International Journal of Political Economy 35 (3): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, Damian. 2017. Record-Breaking Climate Change Pushes World Into “Uncharted Territory”. The Guardian, 21 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C.M. 1997. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., S. Stern, R. Kaplinsky, F. Muniesa, M. Nabli, M. O’Neill, H. Ortiz, K. Sahlin, A. Schwittay, and L. Talbot. 2016. Chapter 6: Markets, Finance and Corporations: Does Capitalism have a Future? Draft report for comment of the International Panel on Social Progress. Accessed 23 February 2017. https://comment.ipsp.org/chapter/chapter-6-markets-finance-and-corporations-does-capitalism-have-future

  • Delle Fave, A., I. Brdar, T. Freire, D. Vella-Brodrick, and M. Wissing. 2011. The Eudaimonic and Hedonic Components of Happiness: Qualitative and Quantitative Findings. Social Indicators Research 100 (2): 185–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B.S., N. Nakicenovic, K. Alfsen, J. Corfee Morlot, F. de la Chesnaye, J.-Ch. Hourcade, K. Jiang, et al. 2007. Issues Related to Mitigation in the Long Term Context. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, and L.A. Meyer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M., S. Kartha, S. Bolwig, Y.L. Chee, Y. Chen, E. Corbera, F. Lecocq, et al. 2014. Sustainable Development and Equity. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, and J.C. Minx. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimalda, G., K. Moene, H. Ono, F. Filgueira, J. Roemer, R. Nanavaty, K. Gibson, C. Graham and D. Schkade. 2016. Chapter 8: Social Justice, Well-Being and Economic Organization. Draft report for comment of the International Panel on Social Progress. Accessed 23 February 2017. https://comment.ipsp.org/chapter/chapter-8-social-justice-well-being-and-economic-organization

  • Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why we Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2012. Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [C.B. Field, V. Barros, T.F. Stocker, D. Qin, D.J. Dokken, K.L. Ebi, M.D. Mastrandrea, K.J. Mach, G.-K. Plattner, S.K. Allen, M. Tignor, and P.M. Midgley (eds)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds)]. Geneva: IPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. 2005. Motivating Sustainable Consumption. A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. Guildford: Sustainable Development Research Network, University of Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, M., and O. Edenhofer. 2015. Welfare with or without Growth? Do We Need to Reduce Economic Activity to Protect the Environment and Increase the Quality of Life? GAIA 24 (4): 240–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P. 2015. Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonagh, Seán. 2016. Different Faiths United in Call for Climate Action. The Irish Times, 4 October 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, S., and L. Dilling. 2007. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., and D. Mulvaney. 2013. The Political Economy of the ‘Just Transition’. The Geographical Journal 179 (2): 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., and M. Paterson. 2010. Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, T. 2016. Seeking Wellbeing in the Pathway of Low Carbon Transition. Plenary address to the International Conference on Energy of Economic and Environmental Sustainability, 21 October 2016, Lahore, Pakistan. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.34339.25124

  • OECD. 2015. In it Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, P., C. Electris, and R.A. Rosen. 2010. The Century Ahead: Searching for Sustainability. Sustainability 2: 2626–2651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sathaye, J., A. Najam, C. Cocklin, T. Heller, F. Lecocq, J. Llanes-Regueiro, J. Pan, et al. 2007. Sustainable Development and Mitigation. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. B. Metz, O.R. Davidson, P.R. Bosch, R. Dave, and L.A. Meyer. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, B., A. Hodgson, G. Leicester, A. Lyon, and I. Fazey. 2016. Three Horizons: A Pathways Practice for Transformation. Ecology and Society 21 (2): 47. Accessed 24 February 2017. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol21/iss2/art47/

  • Simms, Andrew. 2016. A New Type of Politics Could Help Prevent Climate Disaster. The Guardian, 9 September 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soderholm, P., R. Hildingsson, B. Johansson, J. Khan, and F. Wilhelmsson. 2011. Governing the Transition to Low-Carbon Futures: A Critical Survey of Energy Scenarios for 2050. Futures 43: 1105–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N., S. Peters, V. Bakhshi, A. Bowen, C. Cameron, S. Catovsky, D. Crane, et al. 2006. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, John. 2016. “Extraordinarily Hot” Arctic Temperatures Alarm Scientists. The Guardian, 22 November 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2010. World Development Report 2010 Development and Climate Change. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Politics and Public Administration, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Peadar Kirby

  2. Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics University of Turku, Tampere, Finland

    Tadhg O’Mahony

Authors
  1. Peadar Kirby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tadhg O’Mahony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirby, P., O’Mahony, T. (2018). Options and Prospects for a Global Low-Carbon Transition. In: The Political Economy of the Low-Carbon Transition. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62554-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation