Abstract
Literature-Based Discovery (LBD) refers to a range of approaches that take a body of scientific literature as the input, apply a series of computational, manual, or a hybrid processes, and finally generate hypotheses that are potentially novel and meaningful for further investigations. This chapter introduces the origin of LBD, its major landmark studies, available tools, and resources. In particular, we explain the design and application of PKD4J to illustrate the principles and analytic decisions one typically needs to make. We highlight the recent developments in this area and outline remaining challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baek SH, Lee D, Kim M, Lee JH, Song M (2017) Enriching plausible new hypothesis generation in PubMed. PLoS ONE 12(7):e0180539
Cameron D, Bodenreider O, Yalamanchili H, Danh T, Vallabhaneni S, Thirunarayan K, Sheth AP, Rindflesch TC (2013) A graph-based recovery and decomposition of Swanson’s hypothesis using semantic predications. J Biomed Inform 46:238–251. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.09.004
Che Z, Kale D, Li W, Bahadori MT, Liu Y (2015) Deep computational phenotyping. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 507–516 (ACM, 2015)
Cohen T, Whitefield GK, Schvaneveldt RW, Mukund K, Rindflesch T (2010) EpiphaNet: an interactive tool to support biomedical discoveries. J Biomed Discov Collab 5:21–49
Cohen WW, Ravikumar P, Fienberg SE (2003) A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In: Paper Presented at the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) 09, Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation
DiGiacomo RA, Kremer JM, Shah DM (1989) Fish-oil dietary supplementation in patients with Raynaud’s pheomenon: a double blind, controlled, prospective study. Am J Med 86:158–164
Hristovski D, Peterlin B, Džeroski S, Stare J (2001) Literature based discovery support system and its application to disease gene identification. In: Proceeding AMIA Symposium 928
Hristovski D, Peterlin B, Mitchell JA, Humphrey SM (2003) Improving literature based discovery support by genetic knowledge integration. Stud Health Technol Inform 95:68–73
Lindsay RK, Gordon MD (1999) Literature-based discovery by lexical statistics. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(7):574–587
Malhotra A, Younesi E, Gurulingappa H, Hofmann-Apitius M (2013) ‘HypothesisFinder:’ a strategy for the detection of speculative statements in scientific text. PLoS Comput Biol 9(7):e1003117. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003117
Manning CD, Surdeanu M, Bauer J, Finkel J, Bethard SJ, McClosky D (2014) The stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, pp 55–60
Pratt W, Yetisgen-Yildiz M (2003) LitLinker: capturing connections across the biomedical literature, K-CAP’03, pp 105–112, Sanibel Island, FL, 23–25 Oct 2003
Rather NN, Patel CO, Khan SA (2017) Using deep learning towards biomedical knowledge discovery. Int J Math Sci Comput (IJMSC) 3(2):1–10. doi:10.5815/ijmsc.2017.02.01
Song M, Kim WC, Lee DH, Heo GE, Kang KY (2015) PKDE4J: entity and relation extraction for public knowledge discovery. J Biomed Inform 57:320–332
Spangler S, Wilkins AD, Bachman BJ, Nagarajan M, Dayaram T, Haas P, Regenbogen S, Pickering CR, Comer A, Myers JN, Stanoi I, Kato L, Lelescu A, Labrie JJ, Parikh N, Lisewski AM, Donehower L, Chen Y, Lichtarge O (2014) Automated hypothesis generation based on mining scientific literature. In: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, New York, NY, USA
Srinivasan P (2004) Text mining: generating hypotheses from MEDLINE. J Am Soc Inf Sci 55(4):396–413
Swanson DR (1986a) Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge. Perspect Biol Med 30:7–18
Swanson DR (1986b) Undiscovered public knowledge. Libr Q 56(2):103–118
Swanson DR (1988) Migraine and magnesium: eleven neglected connections. Perspect Biol Med 31(4):526–557
Swanson DR, Smalheiser NR (1997) An interactive system for finding complementary literatures: a stimulus to scientific discovery. Artif Intell 91:183–203
van der Eijk C, Van Mulligen E, Kors JA, Mons B, Van den Berg J (2004) Constructing an associative concept space for literature-based discovery. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 55(5):436–444
Weeber M, Vos R, Klein H, de Jong-Van den Berg LT, Aronson AR, Molema G (2003) Generating hypotheses by discovering implicit associations in the literature: a case report for new potential therapeutic uses for Thalidomide. J Am Med Inf Assoc 10(3):252–259
Wilkowski B, Fiszman M, Miller CM, Hristovski D, Arabandi S, Rosemblat G, Rindflesh TC (2011) Graph-based methods for discovery browsing with semantic predications. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, pp 1514–1523
Wren JD, Bekeredjian R, Stewart JA, Shohet RV, Garner HR (2004) Knowledge discovery by automated identification and ranking of implicit relationships. Bioinformatics 20(3):389–398
Žitnik M, Janjić V, Larminie C, Zupan B, Pržulj N (2013) Discovering disease-disease associations by fusing systems-level molecular data. Sci Rep 3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, C., Song, M. (2017). Literature-Based Discovery. In: Representing Scientific Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62543-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62543-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62541-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62543-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)