Skip to main content

Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Tumours

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover New Trends in Craniovertebral Junction Surgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 125))

Abstract

Tumours involving the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are challenging because of their local invasiveness and high recurrence rates, as well as their proximity to critical neurovascular structures and the difficulty of reconstructing the resulting skull base defect at this site. Several surgical techniques are currently available to access these lesions, including the far lateral, extreme lateral, direct lateral, transcervical, transoral and transnasal approaches. In this paper, application of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the treatment of CVJ tumours is analysed. The indications, contraindications, preoperative workup, step-by-step surgical technique, skull base reconstruction options and postoperative management are described. The advantages and limitations of the EEA are also discussed. Finally, a systematic review of the literature is provided to elucidate the levels of evidence supporting the use of the EEA in this field. Employment of this approach to the CVJ has contributed to high success rates in achieving gross total resection of tumours and improvement in neurological symptoms. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are acceptable, with cerebrospinal fluid leakage being the major concern (with a 17–25% incidence). Moreover, in comparison with traditional approaches to the CVJ, the EEA provides lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and respiratory complications. Use of the EEA for treatment of CVJ tumours appears to be a rational alternative to the conventional transoral, transcranial and transcervical approaches in selected cases. Multidisciplinary teamwork including different specialists—such as medical and radiation oncologists, radiologists, otorhinolaryngologists and neurosurgeons—is strongly recommended for the purpose of offering the best treatment strategy for the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kshettry VR, Thorp BD, Shriver MF, Zanation AM, Woodard TD, Sindwani R, Recinos PF. Endoscopic approaches to the craniovertebral junction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2016;49:213–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mangussi-Gomes J, Beer-Furlan A, Balsalobre L, Vellutini EA, Stamm AC. Endoscopic endonasal management of skull base chordomas: surgical technique, nuances, and pitfalls. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2016;49:167–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh H, Harrop J, Schiffmacher P, Rosen M, Evans J. Ventral surgical approaches to craniovertebral junction chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fang CH, Friedman R, Schild SD, Goldstein IM, Baredes S, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Purely endoscopic endonasal surgery of the craniovertebral junction: a systematic review. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5:754–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vellutini Ede A, Balsalobre L, Hermann DR, Stamm AC. The endoscopic endonasal approach for extradural and intradural clivus lesions. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:S106–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beer-Furlan A, Vellutini EA, Balsalobre L, Stamm AC. Endoscopic endonasal approach to ventral posterior fossa meningiomas: from case selection to surgical management. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26:413–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lund V, Stammberger H, Nicolai P, Castelnuovo P, et al. European position paper on endoscopic management of tumours of the nose, paranasal sinuses and skull base. Rhinol Suppl. 2010;22:1–143.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chibbaro S, Cornelius JF, Froelich S, Tigan L, Kehrli P, Debry C, Romano A, Herman P, George B, Bresson D. Endoscopic endonasal approach in the management of skull base chordomas—clinical experience on a large series, technique, outcome, and pitfalls. Neurosurg Rev. 2014;37:217–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jahangiri A, Jian B, Miller L, El-Sayed IH, Aghi MK. Skull base chordomas: clinical features, prognostic factors, and therapeutics. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013;24:79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fossati P, Vavassori A, Deantonio L, Ferrara E, Krengli M, Orecchia R. Review of photon and proton radiotherapy for skull base tumours. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2016;21:336–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kooshkabadi A, Choi PA, Koutourousiou M, Snyderman CH, Wang EW, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Gardner PA. Atlanto-occipital instability following endoscopic endonasal approach for lower clival lesions: experience with 212 cases. Neurosurgery. 2015;77:888–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez-Orribo L, Little AS, Lefevre RD, Reyes PR, Newcomb AG, Prevedello DM, Roldan H, Nakaji P, Dickman CA, Crawford NR. Biomechanical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction after anterior unilateral condylectomy: implications for endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cranial base. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:1021–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kasemsiri P, Carrau RL, Ditzel Filho LF, Prevedello DM, Otto BA, Old M, de Lara D, Kassam AB. Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg. 2014;82:S12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho LF, Solari D, Carrau RL, Kassam AB. Expanded endonasal approaches to middle cranial fossa and posterior fossa tumors. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010;21:621–35. vi

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stippler M, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:268–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. La Corte E, Aldana PR, Ferroli P, Greenfield JP, Härtl R, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. The rhinopalatine line as a reliable predictor of the inferior extent of endonasal odontoidectomies. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38:E16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dlouhy BJ, Dahdaleh NS, Menezes AH. Evolution of transoral approaches, endoscopic endonasal approaches, and reduction strategies for treatment of craniovertebral junction pathology: a treatment algorithm update. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38:E8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seker A, Inoue K, Osawa S, Akakin A, Kilic T, Rhoton AL Jr. Comparison of endoscopic transnasal and transoral approaches to the craniovertebral junction. World Neurosurg. 2010;74:583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Turri-Zanoni M, Battaglia P, Dallan I, Locatelli D, Castelnuovo P. Multiportal combined transnasal transoral transpharyngeal endoscopic approach for selected skull base cancers. Head Neck. 2016;38:E2440–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Neligan PC, Mulholland S, Irish J, Gullane PJ, Boyd JB, Gentili F, Brown D, Freeman J. Flap selection in cranial base reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:1159–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Anand VK, Murali RK, Glasgold MJ. Surgical decisions in the management of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhoea. Rhinology. 1995;33:212–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1882–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fortes FS, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam A, Prevedello D, Vescan A, Mintz A, Gardner P. Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:970–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Murakami CS, Kriet D, Ierokomos A. Nasal reconstruction using the inferior turbinate mucosal flap. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1:97–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fortes FS, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Prevedello D, Vescan A, Mintz A, Gardner P, Kassam AB. The posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap: a new vascularized flap for skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1329–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliver CL, Hackman TG, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Gardner P. Palatal flap modifications allow pedicled reconstruction of the skull base. Laryngoscope. 2008;118:2102–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gun R, Oyama K, Kapucu B, Wang L, Al Qahtani AA, Otto BA, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL. Salpingopharyngeus myomucosal flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1967–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Aviv JE, Sultan MR. Free flaps in skull base surgery. In: Donald PJ, editor. Surgery of the skull base. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p. 607–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leng LZ, Brown S, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Gasket-seal watertight closure in minimal-access endoscopic cranial base surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(5 Suppl 2):ONSE342–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nyquist GG, Anand VK, Singh A, Schwartz TH. Janus flap: bilateral nasoseptal flaps for anterior skull base reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:327–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McCoul ED, Anand VK, Singh A, Nyquist GG, Schaberg MR, Schwartz TH. Long-term effectiveness of a reconstructive protocol using the nasoseptal flap after endoscopic skull base surgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;81:136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Shah RN, Surowitz JB, Patel MR Huang BY, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Germanwala AV, Zanation AM. Endoscopic pedicled nasoseptal flap reconstruction for pediatric skull base defects. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:1067–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Harvey RJ, Nogueira JF, Schlosser RJ, Patel SJ, Vellutini E, Stamm AC. Closure of large skull base defects after endoscopic transnasal craniotomy. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:371–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. El-Sayed IH, Roediger FC, Goldberg AN, Parsa AT, McDermott MW. Endoscopic reconstruction of skull base defects with the nasal septal flap. Skull Base. 2008;18:385–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Terranova P, Karligkiotis A, Gallo S, Gallo S, Meloni F, Bignami M, Castelnuovo P. A novel endoscopic technique for long-term patency of cholesterol granulomas of the petrous apex. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2639–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Karligkiotis A, Bignami M, Terranova P, Ciniglio-Appiani M, Shawkat A, Verrilaud B, Meloni F, Herman P, Castelnuovo P. Use of the pedicled nasoseptal flap in the endoscopic management of cholesterol granulomas of the petrous apex. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5:747–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rivera-Serrano CM, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, et al. Nasoseptal rescue flap: a novel modification of the nasoseptal flap technique for pituitary surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:990–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Otto BA, Bowe SN, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Ditzel Filho LF, de Lara D. Transsphenoidal approach with nasoseptal flap pedicle transposition: modified rescue flap technique. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:2976–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Agarwal CA, Mendenhall SD, Foreman KB, Owsley JQ. The course of the frontal branch of the facial nerve in relation to fascial planes: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:532–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zide BM, Jelks GW. Forehead, temporal region and cheek. In: Zide BM, Jelks GW, editors. Surgical anatomy of the orbit. New York: Raven; 1988. p. 13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bolzoni Villaret A, Nicolai P, Schreiber A, Bizzoni A, Farina D, Tschabitscher M. The temporo-parietal fascial flap in extended transnasal endoscopic procedures: cadaver dissection and personal clinical experience. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:1473–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Saito K, Toda M, Tomita T, Ogawa K, Yoshida K. Surgical results of an endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Acta Neurochir. 2012;154:879–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koutourousiou M, Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Henry SL, Stefko ST, Kassam AB, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH. Endoscopic endonasal approach for resection of cranial base chordomas: outcomes and learning curve. Neurosurgery. 2012;71:614–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Frank G, Sciarretta V, Calbucci F, Farneti G, Mazzatenta PE. The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:ONS50–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carrabba G, Dehdashti AR, Gentili F. Surgery for clival lesions: open resection versus the expanded endoscopic endonasal approach. Neurosurg Focus. 2008;25:E7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tan NC-W, Naidoo Y, Oue S, Alexander H, Robinson S, Wickremesekera A, Floreani S, Vrodos N, Santoreneos S, Ooi E, McDonald M, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic surgery of skull base chordomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012;73:379–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang Q, Kong F, Yan B, Ni Z, Liu H. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for clival chordoma and chondrosarcoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2008;70:124–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Messerer M, Cossu G, Pasche P, Ikonomidis C, Simon C, Pralong E, George M, Levivier M, Daniel RT. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to clival and paraclival tumors: indications and limits. Neurochirurgie. 2016;62:136–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Alexander H, Robinson S, Wickremesekera A, Wormald PJ. Endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a midclival meningioma. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17:374–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Prosser JD, Vender JR, Alleyne CH, Solares CA. Expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches to skull base meningiomas. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012;73:147–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Simal Julian JA, Sanromán Álvarez P, Miranda Lloret P, Plaza Ramirez E, Pérez Borreda P, Botella Asunción C. Full endoscopic endonasal transclival approach: meningioma attached to the ventral surface of the brainstem. Neurocirugia (Astur). 2014;25:140–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Iacoangeli M, Di Rienzo A, di Somma LG, Moriconi E, Alvaro L, Re M, Salvinelli F, Carassiti M, Scerrati M. Improving the endoscopic endonasal transclival approach: the importance of a precise layer by layer reconstruction. Br J Neurosurg. 2014;28:241–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gardner PA, Tormenti MJ, Pant H, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Snyderman CH, Horowitz MB. Carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: incidence and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2013;73:ONS261–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Morales-Valero SF, Serchi E, Zoli M, Mazzatenta D, Van Gompel JJ. Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniovertebral junction pathology: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;38:E15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

 No financial support was received for this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Locatelli, D., Karligkiotis, A., Turri-Zanoni, M., Canevari, F.R., Pozzi, F., Castelnuovo, P. (2019). Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Tumours. In: Visocchi, M. (eds) New Trends in Craniovertebral Junction Surgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 125. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62515-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62514-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62515-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics