Skip to main content

Internationalizing Minimal English: Perils and Parallels

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Minimal English for a Global World

Abstract

This chapter links the development of Minimal English to the concerns of practitioners and analysts of international affairs. Using examples from the Asian region, the authors suggest that, in this new era of multipolar intercultural relations, the need for neutral languages for coordination is greater than ever. A case study of US–China relations shows that using English in ways that do not acknowledge its heavy cultural and power baggage can invite misunderstanding and resistance. The authors argue that Minimal English offers a chance to move from a mode of domination and socialization to a mode of coordination and renegotiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bolton, Kingsley, and Braj B. Kachru, eds. 2004. World Englishes: Critical Concepts in Linguistics, 6 vols. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Bonnie S., and Evan S. Medeiros. 2007. The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-Making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of ‘Peaceful Rise’. The China Quarterly 190: 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, Cliff, and Anna Wierzbicka. 2014. Global English, Minimal English: Towards Better Intercultural Communication. Paper Presented at Symposium “Global English, Minimal English”, Australian National University, 2–3 July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J., and Takashi Shiraishi. 1997. Network Power: Japan and Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maley, William. This volume. Minimal English and Diplomacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, Walter Russell. 2004. America’s Sticky Power. Foreign Policy 141 (March): 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, Alastair. 2013. The Cultural Politics of English as an International Language. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 2006. English: Meaning and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Imprisoned in English: The Hazards of English as a Default Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoellick, Robert B. 2005. Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility? Remarks to National Committee on US-China Relations, New York City, 21 September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farrelly, N., Wesley, M. (2018). Internationalizing Minimal English: Perils and Parallels. In: Goddard, C. (eds) Minimal English for a Global World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62512-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62512-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62511-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62512-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics