Skip to main content

Ancient Chinese Attitudes toward Technics: Chinese Philosophy of Technology Prior to the 1800s

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Engineering, East and West

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 330))

  • 633 Accesses

Abstract

Chinese scholars began to reflect on technics and technology during ancient times. The earliest effort in recorded history is the Yijing, which has been attributed to the Western Zhou dynasty. What was originally a book of divination also contains philosophical reflections on technics which have influenced views of later generations. The philosophical traditions of Confucianism and Daoism have also contributed to Chinese philosophy of technics and technology, although they tended to promote opposing attitudes. In addition, there are influential practical texts such as two technical manuals, the Kaogong ji and Tiangong kaiwu. Summarizing from all these sources, three key ideas that distinguish Chinese from Western thinking about traditional technics and eventually modern technology are the absence of a Creator god (or, more positively, a sense of the material world as self- subsisting), an emphasis on practice (and the primacy of practical or political affairs in human life), and a concern for harmony between heaven and earth (that is, between human beings with the larger world in which they live).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen, Guying. (1988). Laozi zhu yi ji ping jie [Annotation, interpretation, and comments on Laozi]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju [Zhonghua Book Company].

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Guying. (1999). Zhuangzi qian shuo [Brief introduction to Zhuangzi]. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju [Zhonghua Book Company].

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. (2002). Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages (2nd edition). Trans. Hugh Bredin. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Qi. (2005). “Kaogongji de gongyi sixiang” [Craft thoughts in Kaogongji]. Shixue yuekan [Journal of historical sciences], 10, 119-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, Youlan. (2007). Zhongguo zhexue jian shi [Short history of Chinese philosophy]. Bilingual English & Chinese edition. Tianjin: Tianjin shehui kexue chubanshe [Tianjin Academy of Social Sciences Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Feng. (2004). Zhongguo sheji shi [Chinese history of design]. Nanning: Guangxi meishu chubanshe [Guangxi Fine Arts Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, H. A., translator. (1889). Zhuangzi: Mystic, Moralist, and Social Reformer. London: Bernard Quaritch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Hongkyung. (2012). The Old Master: A Syncretic Reading of the Laozi from the Mawangdui Text A Onward. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James, translator. (1882). The Texts of Confucianism: Part II: The Yi King.Oxford: Clarendon Press. (The Yijing has a complex structure that has been rendered differently in various English translations; here I simply follow that provided by Legge.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James, translator. (1891). The Texts of Daoism: Part I: Tao Te Ching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, James, translator. (1895). The Chinese Classics with a Translations, Critical and Exegetical Notes, Prolegomena, and Copious Indexes. Vol II, The Work of Mencius: Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Chenyang. (2005). “Confucian Perspectives.” In Carl Mitcham, ed., Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics (Farmington Hills, MI: Macmillan Reference), vol. 1, pp. 405-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Wenchao and Liu, Zeyuan. (2005). “Deguo jishuzhexue fazhan lishi de zhong de duihua” [Dialogue between China and Germany on the history of German philosophy of technology], Zhexue dongtai [Philosophical trends], 5, 47-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Zehou. (1985). Gudai sixiangshi lun [On ancient history of thoughts]. Beijing: Renmin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Ming. (1995). “Zhuangzi jishu sixiang ping xi” [Comment on Zhuangzi’s view of technique]. Ziran bianzhengfa tongxun [Journal of dialects of nature], 17 (3), 35-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, Carl. (1994). Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Technology. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. (1954). Science and Civilization in China. Vol 1: Introductory Orientations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. (1956). Science and Civilization in China. Vol. 2: History of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, Joseph. (1969). The Grand Titration: Science and Society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nosco, Peter. (1998). “Confucian Philosophy, Japanese”. In E. Craig, ed., Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Routledge), vol. 2, pp. 549-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slingerland, Edward, translator. (2003). Confucius Analects: With Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Yingxing. (1966). Tiangong kaiwu: Chinese Technology in the Seventeenth Century. Trans. E-tu Zen Sun and Shiou-chuan Sun. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Yingxing. (1992). Tiangong kaiwu yizhu [Tiangong kaiwu translated and annotated]. Annotated by Pan Jixing. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe [Shanghai Classics Publisher].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Renjun. (1993). Kaogongji yizhu. [Kaogongji translated and annotated]. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chubanshe [Shanghai Classics Publisher].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Nong. (2004). Zhongguo yishu sheji shi [Chinese history of art and design]. Xi’an: Shaanxi remin meishu chubanshe [Shaanxi People’s Fine Arts Press].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Some paragraphs in this text reiterate points made in my article on “Philosophical Perspectives on Technology in Chinese Society,” Technology in Society 35 (2013), pp. 165–171. I also want to acknowledge and thank Katherine Robert and Carl Mitcham for assistance with English.

Note on Translations

Quoted English translations from the Chinese, as well as references to Chinese in English texts, have often been edited slightly to fit present uses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to WANG Nan   (王楠).

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Nan, W. (2018). Ancient Chinese Attitudes toward Technics: Chinese Philosophy of Technology Prior to the 1800s. In: Mitcham, C., LI, B., Newberry, B., ZHANG, B. (eds) Philosophy of Engineering, East and West. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics