Skip to main content

On Relationships between the History and Philosophy of Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy of Engineering, East and West

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 330))

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between the history and philosophy of engineering is similar to that between the history and philosophy of science and that between the history and philosophy of technology. Lakatos’ thesis—that “philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind”—applies as well to the history and philosophy of engineering. To advance the history of engineering requires some attention to the nature of engineering and vice versa. The effort here is to draw some lines of demarcation among the histories of engineering, of technology, of science, and of economics from a philosophical point view. With regard to history, a theory of engineering evolution can bridge philosophy and history; an important part of such an evolution will also consider historical developments in the engineering community. There nevertheless remain important tensions and complementarities between the history and philosophy of engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armytage, W. H. G. (1961). A Social History of Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, George. (1988). The Evolution of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, Mario. (1966). “Technology as Applied Science,” Technology and Culture, 7(3), 329–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, Louis L. (2003). Engineering Philosophy. Delft, Netherlands: DUP Satellite.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Steen H., Martin Meganck, and Bernard Delahousse, eds. (2007). Philosophy in Engineering. Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutcliffe, Stephen H. (2000). Ideas, Machines, and Values: An Introduction to Science, Technology, and Society Studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, Gary L., Arthur Donovan, and Timothy J. Elliott. (1989). “The Invisible Engineer: How Engineering Ceased to Be a Problem in Science and Technology Studies,” Knowledge and Society, 8, 189–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, Paul T. (1989). “History and Philosophy of Technology: Tensions and Complementarities.” In Stephan H. Cutcliffe and Robert C. Post, eds., In Context: History and the History of Technology (Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press), 120–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, Paul K. (1999). Knowledge, Science, and Relativism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Jun. (2007). Mu Ouchu ping zhuan [Critical biography of Mu Ouchu]. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Steven L. (1990). “Philosophy, Engineering, and Western Culture.” In Paul T. Durbin, ed., Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 125–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, Steven L. (1991). “The Social Captivity of Engineering.” In Paul T. Durbin, ed., Critical Perspective on Nonacademic Science and Engineering (Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press), 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, A. A., Brian W. Baetz, and Rudi R. Volti. (2004). Engineering in Time: The Systematics of Engineering History and Its Contemporary Context. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, Don. (1993). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jia, Genliang. (2012). Yanhua jingjiixue de zonghe [Integrated theory of economic evolution]. Beijing: Kexue Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Sean F. (2011). “Making the Invisible Engineer Visible: Dupont and the Recognition of Nuclear Expertise,” Technology and Culture, 52(3), 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kranzberg, Melvin. (1986). “Technology and History: ‘Kranzberg's Laws’,”Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. (2000). The Road since Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Bocong. (2002). Gongcheng zhexue yinlun [Introduction to philosophy of engineering]. Zhengzhou: Daxiang Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Bocong. (2010a). “The Rise of Philosophy of Engineering in the East and the West.” In Ibo van de Poel and David E. Goldbeg, eds., Philosophy and Engineering: An Emerging Agenda (Dordrecht: Springer), 31-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Bocong, ed. (2010b). Gongcheng shehuixue dao lun: Gongcheng gongtongti yanjiu [Introduction to sociology of engineering: Examining the engineering community]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Gang. (2010). Hou fute zhi [On post-Fordism]. Beijing: Caizheng Jingji Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Maureen. (1991). “How Do National Systems of Innovation Differ? A Critical Analysis of Porter, Freeman, Lundvall and Nelson.” In Geoffrey M. Hodgson and Ernesto Screpanti, eds., Rethinking Economics: Markets, Technology and Economic Evolution (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar), 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, Carl and Robert Mackey. (1973). Bibliography of the Philosophy of Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, John B. (1975). “Engineers Are People,” Technology and Culture. 16(3), 404–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skolimowski, Henry K. (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology,” Technology and Culture 7, 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichi, Cecelia. (1987). Shifting Gears: Technology, Literature, Culture in Modernist America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Ruiyu, Wang Yingluo, and Li Bocong, eds. (2007). Gongcheng zhexue [Philosophy of engineering]. Beijing: Gaodeng Jiaoyu Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, Ruiyu, Li Bocong, and Wang Yingluo, eds. (2011). Gongcheng yanhua lun [Theory of engineering evolution]. Beijing: Gaodeng Jiaoyu Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to LI Bocong   (李伯聪).

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bocong, L. (2018). On Relationships between the History and Philosophy of Engineering. In: Mitcham, C., LI, B., Newberry, B., ZHANG, B. (eds) Philosophy of Engineering, East and West. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics