Abstract
The relationship between the history and philosophy of engineering is similar to that between the history and philosophy of science and that between the history and philosophy of technology. Lakatos’ thesis—that “philosophy of science without history of science is empty; history of science without philosophy of science is blind”—applies as well to the history and philosophy of engineering. To advance the history of engineering requires some attention to the nature of engineering and vice versa. The effort here is to draw some lines of demarcation among the histories of engineering, of technology, of science, and of economics from a philosophical point view. With regard to history, a theory of engineering evolution can bridge philosophy and history; an important part of such an evolution will also consider historical developments in the engineering community. There nevertheless remain important tensions and complementarities between the history and philosophy of engineering.
References
Armytage, W. H. G. (1961). A Social History of Engineering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Basalla, George. (1988). The Evolution of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bunge, Mario. (1966). “Technology as Applied Science,” Technology and Culture, 7(3), 329–347.
Bucciarelli, Louis L. (2003). Engineering Philosophy. Delft, Netherlands: DUP Satellite.
Christensen, Steen H., Martin Meganck, and Bernard Delahousse, eds. (2007). Philosophy in Engineering. Aarhus, Denmark: Academica.
Cutcliffe, Stephen H. (2000). Ideas, Machines, and Values: An Introduction to Science, Technology, and Society Studies. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Downey, Gary L., Arthur Donovan, and Timothy J. Elliott. (1989). “The Invisible Engineer: How Engineering Ceased to Be a Problem in Science and Technology Studies,” Knowledge and Society, 8, 189–216.
Durbin, Paul T. (1989). “History and Philosophy of Technology: Tensions and Complementarities.” In Stephan H. Cutcliffe and Robert C. Post, eds., In Context: History and the History of Technology (Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press), 120–132.
Feyerabend, Paul K. (1999). Knowledge, Science, and Relativism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gao, Jun. (2007). Mu Ouchu ping zhuan [Critical biography of Mu Ouchu]. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Press.
Goldman, Steven L. (1990). “Philosophy, Engineering, and Western Culture.” In Paul T. Durbin, ed., Broad and Narrow Interpretations of Philosophy of Technology (Dordrecht: Kluwer), 125–152.
Goldman, Steven L. (1991). “The Social Captivity of Engineering.” In Paul T. Durbin, ed., Critical Perspective on Nonacademic Science and Engineering (Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press), 121–145.
Harms, A. A., Brian W. Baetz, and Rudi R. Volti. (2004). Engineering in Time: The Systematics of Engineering History and Its Contemporary Context. London: Imperial College Press.
Ihde, Don. (1993). Philosophy of Technology: An Introduction. New York: Paragon House.
Jia, Genliang. (2012). Yanhua jingjiixue de zonghe [Integrated theory of economic evolution]. Beijing: Kexue Press.
Johnston, Sean F. (2011). “Making the Invisible Engineer Visible: Dupont and the Recognition of Nuclear Expertise,” Technology and Culture, 52(3), 548–573.
Kranzberg, Melvin. (1986). “Technology and History: ‘Kranzberg's Laws’,”Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas S. (2000). The Road since Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Li, Bocong. (2002). Gongcheng zhexue yinlun [Introduction to philosophy of engineering]. Zhengzhou: Daxiang Press.
Li, Bocong. (2010a). “The Rise of Philosophy of Engineering in the East and the West.” In Ibo van de Poel and David E. Goldbeg, eds., Philosophy and Engineering: An Emerging Agenda (Dordrecht: Springer), 31-40.
Li, Bocong, ed. (2010b). Gongcheng shehuixue dao lun: Gongcheng gongtongti yanjiu [Introduction to sociology of engineering: Examining the engineering community]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.
Liu, Gang. (2010). Hou fute zhi [On post-Fordism]. Beijing: Caizheng Jingji Press.
McKelvey, Maureen. (1991). “How Do National Systems of Innovation Differ? A Critical Analysis of Porter, Freeman, Lundvall and Nelson.” In Geoffrey M. Hodgson and Ernesto Screpanti, eds., Rethinking Economics: Markets, Technology and Economic Evolution (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar), 117–137.
Mitcham, Carl and Robert Mackey. (1973). Bibliography of the Philosophy of Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rae, John B. (1975). “Engineers Are People,” Technology and Culture. 16(3), 404–418.
Skolimowski, Henry K. (1966). “The Structure of Thinking in Technology,” Technology and Culture 7, 371–383.
Tichi, Cecelia. (1987). Shifting Gears: Technology, Literature, Culture in Modernist America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Yin, Ruiyu, Wang Yingluo, and Li Bocong, eds. (2007). Gongcheng zhexue [Philosophy of engineering]. Beijing: Gaodeng Jiaoyu Press.
Yin, Ruiyu, Li Bocong, and Wang Yingluo, eds. (2011). Gongcheng yanhua lun [Theory of engineering evolution]. Beijing: Gaodeng Jiaoyu Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bocong, L. (2018). On Relationships between the History and Philosophy of Engineering. In: Mitcham, C., LI, B., Newberry, B., ZHANG, B. (eds) Philosophy of Engineering, East and West. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62450-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62448-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62450-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)