Advertisement

Carbon-Based Nanocomposites for Visible Light-Induced Photocatalysis

  • Elaheh KowsariEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials book series (SSPCM)

Abstract

This paper gives a brief overview of the progress in the development of carbon-based nanocomposites for visible light-induced photocatalysis, based on graphene, graphene oxide , g-C3N4, [60]-fullerenes , and carbon nanotubes nanocomposites. In particular, recent progresses on the emerging strategies for tailoring carbon-based nanocomposites photocatalysts to enhance their photoactivity including elemental doping, heterostructure design and functional architecture assembly are discussed. The reported examples are collected and analyzed; and the reaction mechanism, the influence of various factors on the photocatalytic performance, the challenges involved, and the outlooks of carbon-based nanocomposites as photocatalyst are discussed in detail. Finally, some important applications such as photocatalytic degradation of pollutants, photocatalytic H2 production, and photocatalytic CO2 reduction are reviewed.

Keywords

Photocatalysis Graphene Graphene oxide Fullerenes Carbon nanotubes Nanocomposites 

References

  1. Arbogast JW, Darmanyan AP, Foote CS, Diederich FN, Whetten RL, Rubin Y, Alvarez MM, Anz SJ (1991) Photophysical properties of sixty atom carbon molecule (C60) J Phys Chem 95(1):11–12Google Scholar
  2. Arunachalam P, Zhang S, Abe T, Komura M, Iyoda T, Nagai K (2016) Weak visible light (∼mW/cm2) organophotocatalysis for mineralization of amine, thiol and aldehyde by biphasic cobalt phthalocyanine/fullerene nanocomposites prepared by wet process. Appl Catal B Environ 193:240–247Google Scholar
  3. Bagri A, Mattevi C, Acik M, Chabal YJ, Chhowalla M, Shenoy VB (2010) Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat Chem 29(7):581–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai Y, Ye L, Wang L, Shi X, Wang P, Bai W, Wong PK (2016) g-C3N4/Bi4O5I2 heterojunction with I3 /I redox mediator for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 conversion. Appl Catal B 194:98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bera R, Mandal S, Mondal B, Jana B, Nayak SK, Patra A (2016) Graphene–porphyrin nanorod composites for solar light harvesting. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(3):1562–1568Google Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Tian G, Mao G, Li R, Xiao Y, Han Y (2016) Facile synthesis of well-dispersed Bi2S3 nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide and enhanced photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 378:231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi SK, Kim S, Lim SK, Park HK (2010) Photocatalytic comparison of TiO2 nanoparticles and electrospun TiO2 nanofibers: effects of mesoporosity and interparticle charge transfer. J Phys Chem C 114(39):16475–16480Google Scholar
  8. Czech B, Buda W, Pasieczna-Patkowska S, Oleszczuk P (2015) MWCNT–TiO2–SiO2 nanocomposites possessing the photocatalytic activity in UVA and UVC. Appl Catal B 162:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai K, Peng T, Ke D, Wei B (2009) Photocatalytic hydrogen generation using a nanocomposite of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and TiO2 nanoparticles under visible light irradiation. Nanotechnol 20(12):125603 Google Scholar
  10. Deng X, Zhang Q, Zhao Q, Ma L, Ding M, Xu X (2015) Effects of architectures and H2O2 additions on the photocatalytic performance of hierarchical Cu2O nanostructures. Nanno Res Lett 10:8Google Scholar
  11. Di J, Xia J, Ge Y, Li H, Ji H, Xu H, Zhang Q, Li H, Li M (2015a) Novel visible-light-driven CQDs/Bi2WO6 hybrid materials with enhanced photocatalytic activity toward organic pollutants degradation and mechanism insight. Appl Catal B 168–169:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di J, Xia J, Ji M, Wang B, Yin S, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Li H (2015b) Carbon quantum dots modified biocl ultrathin nanosheets with enhanced molecular oxygen activation ability for broad spectrum photocatalytic properties and mechanism insight. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(36):20111–20123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Di J, Xia J, Ji M, Wang B, Li X, Zhang Q, Chen Z, Li H (2016a) Nitrogen-doped carbon quantum dots/BiOBr ultrathin nanosheets: in situ strong coupling and improved molecular oxygen activation ability under visible light irradiation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4(1):136–146Google Scholar
  14. Di J, Xia J, Ji M, Wang B, Yin S, Xu H, Chen Z, Li H (2016b) Carbon quantum dots induced ultrasmall BiOI nanosheets with assembled hollow structures for broad spectrum photocatalytic activity and mechanism insight. Langmuir 32(8):2075–2084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dong F, Wang Z, Sun Y, Ho WK, Zhang H (2013) Engineering the nanoarchitecture and texture of polymeric carbon nitride semiconductor for enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interface Sci 401:70–79Google Scholar
  16. Du Y, Cheng Z, Yu Z, Do SX, Wang X, Liu L (2012) Hydrothermal synthesized bismuth ferrites particles: thermodynamic, structural, and magnetic properties. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12(2):1684–1687Google Scholar
  17. Eda G, Lin YY, Mattevi C, Yamaguchi H, Chen HA, Chen IS, Chen CW, Chhowalla M (2010) Blue photoluminescence from chemically derived graphene oxide. Adv Mater 22(4):505–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fan C, Chen C, Wang J, Fu X, Ren Z, Qian G, Wang Z (2015) Black hydroxylated titanium dioxide prepared via ultrasonication with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Sci Rep 4:11712Google Scholar
  19. Fan C, Liu Q, Ma T, Shen J, Yang Y, Tang H, Wang Y, Yang J (2016) Fabrication of 3D CeVO4/graphene aerogels with efficient visible-light photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 42:10487–10492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–38Google Scholar
  21. Ghaffar I, Warsi MF, Shahid M, Shakir I (2016) Unprecedented photocatalytic activity of carbon coated/MoO3 core–shell nanoheterostructurs under visible light irradiation. Physica E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostruct 79:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gong B, Lu Y, Wu P, Huang Z, Zhu Y, Dang Z, Zhu N, Lu G, Huang J (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity over Cd0.5Zn0.5S with stacking fault structure combined with Cu2+ modified carbon nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 365:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong J, Zhang W, WangY, Zhou T, Xu R (2014) Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide over self-assembled carbon nitride and layered double hydroxide: the role of carbon dioxide enrichment. Chem Cat Chem 6(8):2315–2321Google Scholar
  24. Hu S, Wei Z, Chang Q, Trinchi A, Yang J (2016a) A facile and green method towards coal-based fluorescent carbon dots with photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 378:402–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu XY, Zhou K, Chen BY, Chang CT (2016b) Graphene/TiO2/ZSM-5 composites synthesized by mixture design were used for photocatalytic degradation of oxytetracycline under visible light: mechanism and biotoxicity. Appl Surf Sci 362:329–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang M, Yu J, Deng C, Huang Y, Fan M, Li B, Tong Z, Zhang F, Dong L (2016) 3D nanospherical CdxZn1−xS/reduced graphene oxide composites with superior photocatalytic activity and photocorrosion resistance. Appl Surf Sci 365:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hung CH, Yuan C, Li HW (2016) Photodegradation of diethyl phthalate with PANi/CNT/TiO2 immobilized on glass plate irradiated with visible light and simulated sunlight—effect of synthesized method and Ph. J Hazard Mater (In Press, Corrected Proof)Google Scholar
  28. Johns JE, Hersam MC (2013) Atomic covalent functionalization of graphene. Acc Chem Res 46:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kang Z , Tsang CHA, Wong NB, Zhang Z, Lee ST (2007) Silicon quantum dots: A general photocatalyst for reduction, decomposition, and selective oxidation reactions. J Am Chem Soc129(40):12090–12091Google Scholar
  30. Kudin KN (2008) Zigzag graphene nanoribbons with saturated edges. ACS Nano 2(3):516–522Google Scholar
  31. Kudin KN, Ozbas B, Schniepp HC, Prud’homme RK, Aksay IA, Car R (2008) Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett 8(1):36–41Google Scholar
  32. Kuriki R, Ishitani O, Maeda K (2016) Unique solvent effects on visible-light CO2 reduction over ruthenium(II)-complex/carbon nitride hybrid photocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(9):6011–6018Google Scholar
  33. Lan ZA, Zhang G, Wang X (2016) A facile synthesis of Br-modified g-C3N4 semiconductors for photoredox water splitting. Appl Catal B Environ 192:116–125Google Scholar
  34. Lim SY, Shen W, Gao Z (2015) Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem Soc Rev 1Google Scholar
  35. Liu G, Wang L, Yang HG, Cheng HG, Lu GQ (2010) Titania-based photocatalysts—crystal growth, doping and heterostructuring. J Mater Chem 5Google Scholar
  36. Liu Y, Sun D, Askari S, Patel J, Macias-Montero M, Mitra S, Zhang R, Wen-Feng Lin WF, Mariotti D, Maguire P (2015) Enhanced dispersion of TiO2 nanoparticles in a TiO2/PEDOT: PSS hybrid nanocomposite via plasmaliquid interactions Sci Rep 5Google Scholar
  37. Leary R, Westwood A (2011) carbonaceous nanomaterials for the enhancement of TiO2. Photocatalysis Carbon 49:741–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lee G, Cho K (2009) Electronic structures of zigzag graphene nanoribbons with edge hydrogenation and oxidation. Phys Rev B 79:165440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lei ZD, Wang JJ, Wang L, Yang XY, Xu G, Tang L (2016) Efficient photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen in aqueous solution using novel visible-light responsive graphene quantum dot/AgVO3 nanoribbons. J Hazard Mater 312:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li G, Jiang B, Li X, Lian Z, Xiao S, Zhu J, Zhang D, Li H (2013) C60/Bi2TiO4F2 heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible-light activity for environmental remediation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(15):7190–7197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li L, Yu L, Lin Z, Yang G (2016a) Reduced TiO2-graphene oxide heterostructure as broad spectrum-driven efficient water-splitting photocatalysts. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(13):8536–8545Google Scholar
  42. Li Q, Guo B, Yu J, Ran J, Zhang B, Yan H, Gong JR (2011) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 133(28):10878–10884Google Scholar
  43. Li M, Zhang L, Fan X, Wu M, Du Y, Wang M, Kong Q, Zhang L, Shi J (2016b) Dual synergetic effects in MoS2/pyridine-modified g-C3N4 composite for highly active and stable photocatalytic hydrogen evolution under visible light. Appl Catal B 190:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li S, Dong G, Hailili R, Yang L, Li Y, Wang F, Zeng Y, Wang C (2016c) Effective photocatalytic H2O2 production under visible light irradiation at g-C3N4 modulated by carbon vacancies. Appl Catal B 190:26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li X, Dong C, Wu KL, Xia SH, Hu Y, Ling M, Liu K, Lu XL, Ye Y, Wei XW (2016d) Synthesis of nitrogen-doped graphene–BiOBr nanocomposites with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 164:502–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Li Y, Zhang Z, Pei L, Li X, Fan T, Ji J, Shen J, Ye M (2016e) Multifunctional photocatalytic performances of recyclable Pd-NiFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites via different co-catalyst strategy. Appl Catal B 190:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li Y, Chen L, Wang Y, Zhu L (2016f) Advanced nanostructured photocatalysts based on reduced graphene oxide-flower-like Bi2WO6 composites for an augmented simulated solar photoactivity activity. Mater Sci Eng B 210:29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lian X, Yan B (2016) A post synthetic modified MOF hybrid as heterogeneous photocatalyst for α- phenethyl alcohol and reusable fluorescence sensor. Inorg Chem 55(22):11831–11838Google Scholar
  49. Lian Z, Xu P, Wang W, Zhang D, Xiao S, Li X, Li G (2015) C60-decorated CdS/TiO2 mesoporous architectures with enhanced photostability and photocatalytic activity for H2 evolution. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(8):4533–4540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Liu Q, Liu ZF, Zhang XY, Yang LY, Zhang N, Pan GL, Yin SG, Chen YS, Wei J (2009) Polymer photovotaic cells based on solution-processable graphene and P3HT. Adv Funct Mater 19:894–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu G,Wang L,Yang HG, Cheng HG, Lu GQ (2010) Titania-based photocatalysts—crystal growth, doping and heterostructuring. J Mater Chem 5Google Scholar
  52. Liu C, Li Y, Xu P, Li M, Zen M (2014) Carbon nanotube embedded mesoporous titania pore-hole inorganic hybrid materials with high thermal stability, improved crystallinity and visible-light driven photocatalytic performance. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 195:319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu H, Chen Z, Wang Y (2016a) Plasmonic Ag coated BiOBr 0.2I0.8 nanosheets grown on graphene with excellent visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Photochem Photobiol A 326:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Liu Q, Chen T, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Fang X (2016b) Ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets coupled with carbon nanodots as 2D/0D composites for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Catal B 193:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu S, Li D, Sun H, Ang HM, Tadé MO, Wang S (2016c) Oxygen functional groups in graphitic carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalysis. J Colloid Interface Sci 468:176–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Loh KP, Bao Q, Eda G, Chhowalla M (2010) Graphene oxide as a chemically tunable platform for optical applications. Nat Chem 2(12):1015–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lu G, Yu K, Wen Z, Chen J (2013) Semiconducting graphene: converting graphenefrom semimetal to semiconductor. Nanoscale 5:1353–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ma L, Fan H, Wang J, Zhao Y, Tian H, Dong G (2016) Water-assisted ions in situ intercalation for porous polymeric graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets with superior photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance. Appl Catal B Environ 190:93–102Google Scholar
  59. Matsumoto Y, MiuraY, Takata S (2016) Thickness-dependent flat band potential of anatase TiO2(001) epitaxial films on Nb:SrTiO3(001) investigated by UHV-electrochemistry approach. J Phys Chem C 120(3):1472–1477Google Scholar
  60. Matsumoto Y, Koinuma M, Ida S, Hayami S, Taniguchi T, Hatakeyama K, Tateishi H, Watanabe Y, Amano S (2011) Photoreaction of graphene oxide nanosheets in water. J Phys Chem C 115(39):19280–19286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Maeda K (2014) Rhodium-doped barium titanate perovskite as a stable p-type semiconductor photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution under visible light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(3):2167–2173Google Scholar
  62. Martin DJ, Philip Reardon PJT, Moniz STA, Tang J (2014) Visible light-driven pure water splitting by a nature-inspired organic semiconductor-based system. J Am Chem Soc 136(36):12568–12571Google Scholar
  63. Mkhoyan KA, Contryman AW, Silcox J, Stewart DA, Eda G, Mattevi C, Miller S, Chhowalla M (2009) Atomic and electronic structure of graphene-oxide. Nano Lett 9(3):1058–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mohamed RM, Salam MA (2014) Photocatalytic reduction of aqueous mercury(II) using multi-walled carbon nanotubes/Pd-ZnO nanocomposite. Mater Res Bull 50:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mohamed MM, Osman G, Khairou KS (2015) Fabrication of Ag nanoparticles modified TiO2–CNT heterostructures for enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and bacteria. J Environ Chem Eng 3(3):1847–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nguyen KC, Ngoc MP, Nguyen MV (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of nanohybrids TiO2/CNTs materials. Mater Lett 165:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Niu P, Yin LC, Yang YQ, Liu G, Cheng HM (2014) Increasing the visible light absorption of graphitic carbon nitride (Melon) photocatalysts by homogeneous self-modification with nitrogen vacancies. Adv Mater 26(47):8046–8052Google Scholar
  68. Nuengmatcha P, Chanthai S, Mahachai R, Oh WC (2016) Visible light-driven photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B and industrial dyes (texbrite BAC-L and texbrite NFW-L) by ZnO-graphene-TiO2 composite. J Environ Chem Eng 4(2):2170–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Park H, hul Lee YC, Choi BG, Choi YS, Yang JW, Hong WH (2010) Energy transfer in ionic-liquid-functionalized inorganic nanorods for highly efficient hotocatalytic applications. Small 6(2):290–295 Google Scholar
  70. Patil SP, Patil RP, Mahajan VK, Sonawane GH, Shrivastava VS, Sonawane S (2016) Facile sonochemical synthesis of BiOBr-graphene oxide nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of Direct green. Mater Sci Semicond Process 52:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Pham TT, Nguyen-Huy C, Shin EW (2016) Facile one-pot synthesis of nickel-incorporated titanium dioxide/graphene oxide composites: enhancement of photodegradation under visible-irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 377:301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Putri LK, Tan LL, Ong WJ, Chang WS, Chai SP (2016) Graphene oxide: exploiting its unique properties toward visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Appl Mater Today 4:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Qian X, Yue D, Tian Z, Reng M, Zhu Y, Kan M, Zhang T, Zhao Y (2016) Carbon quantum dots decorated Bi2WO6 nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic oxidation activity for VOCs. Appl Catal B 193:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Qu A, Xinmei Xu X, Xie H, Zhang Y, Li Y, Wang J (2016) Effects of calcining temperature on photocatalysis of g-C3N4/TiO2 composites for hydrogen evolution from water. Mater Res Bull 80:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ran R, Meng X, Zhang Z (2016) Facile preparation of novel graphene oxide-modified Ag2O/Ag3VO4/AgVO3 composites with high photocatalytic activities under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B 196:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ravichandran K, Chidhambaram N, Gobalakrishnan S (2016) Copper and Graphene activated ZnO nanopowders for enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. J Phys Chem Solids 93:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sampaio MJ, Silva CG, Silva AMT, Pastrana-Martínez LM, Han C, Morales-Torres S, Figueiredo JL, Dionysiou DD, Faria JL (2015) Carbon-based TiO2 materials for the degradation of Microcystin-LA. Appl Catal B 170–171:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Serp P, Corrias M, Kalck P (2003) Carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in catalysis. Appl Catal A 253(2):337–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shi H, Li G, Sun H, An T, Zhao H, Wong PK (2014) Visible-light-driven photocatalytic inactivation of E. coli by Ag/AgX-CNTs (X = Cl, Br, I) plasmonic photocatalysts: Bacterial performance and deactivation mechanism. Appl Catal B 158–159:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shi L, Wang T, Zhang H, Chang K, Meng X, Liu H, Ye J (2015) An amine-functionalized iron(III) metal–organic framework as efficient visible-light photocatalyst for Cr(VI) reduction. Adv Sci 2(3)Google Scholar
  81. Shu D, Wu J, Gong Y, Li S, Hu L, Yang Y, He C (2014) BiOI-based photoactivated fuel cell using refractory organic compounds as substrates to generate electricity. Catal Today 224:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Singh AK, Yakobson BI (2009) Electronics and magnetism of patterned graphene nanoroads. Nano Lett 9(4):1540–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singh C, Bansal S, Kumar V, Singhal S (2015) Beading of cobalt substituted nickel ferrite nanoparticles on the surface of carbon nanotubes: a study of their synthesis mechanism, structure, magnetic, optical and their application as photocatalyst. Ceram Int 41(3):3595–3604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Singh AK, Mathew K, Zhuang HL, Hennig RG (2015) Computational Screening of 2D Materials for Photocatalysis. J Phys Chem Lett 196(6):1087–1098Google Scholar
  85. Song T, Huo J, Liao T, Zeng J, Qin J, Zeng J (2016) Fullerene [C60] modified Cr2−xFexO3 nanocomposites for enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J 287:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sun T, Jiang HY, Ma CC, Mao F, Xue B (2016) Ag/g-C3N4 photocatalysts: microwave-assisted synthesis and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Catal Commun 79:45–48Google Scholar
  87. Tajima T, Sakata W, Wada T, Tsutsui A, Nishimoto S, Miyake M, Takaguchi Y (2011) Photosensitized hydrogen evolution from water using a single-walled carbon nanotube/fullerodendron/SiO2 coaxial nanohybrid. Mater Adv 23(48):5750–5754 Google Scholar
  88. Tryba B (2008) Increase of the photocatalytic activity of TiO by carbon and iron modifications. Int J Photoenergy 2008 Google Scholar
  89. Vileno B, Sienkiewicz A, Lekka M, Kulik AJ, Forró, L (2004) In vitro assay of singlet oxygen generation in the presence of water-soluble derivatives of C60. Carbon 42(5–6):1195–1198Google Scholar
  90. Wang X, Zhi LJ, Mullen K (2008) Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 8:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wang X, Blechert S, Antonietti M (2012) Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride for heterogeneous photocatalysis. ACS Catal 2(8):1596–1606Google Scholar
  92. Wang X, Yu JC, Ho C, Hou Y, Fu X (2005) Photocatalytic activity of a hierarchically macro/mesoporous titania. Langmuir 21(6):2552–2559Google Scholar
  93. Wang X, Maeda K, Thomas A, Takanabe K, Gang Xin G, Carlsson JM, Domen K, Antonietti M (2009) A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat Mater 8:76–80Google Scholar
  94. Wang Y, Farooq Ibad M, Kosslick H, Harloff J, TBeweries T, Radnik J, Schulz A, Tschierlei S, Lochbrunner S, Guo X (2015) Synthesis and comparative study of the photocatalytic performance of hierarchically porous polymeric carbon nitrides. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 211:182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wang H, Yuan X, Wang H, Chen X, Wu Z, Jiang L, Xiong W, Zeng G (2016a) Facile synthesis of Sb2S3/ultrathin g-C3N4 sheets heterostructures embedded with g-C3N4 quantum dots with enhanced NIR-light photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B 193:36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang L, Wen M, Wang W, Momuinou N, Wang Z, Li S (2016b) Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using rGO supported TiO2-CdS composite under visible light irradiation. J Alloy Compd 683:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wang Q, Li H, Yang JH, Sun Q, Li Q, Yang J (2016c) Iron phthalocyanine-graphene donor-acceptor hybrids for visible-light-assisted degradation of phenol in the presence of H2O2. Appl Catal B 192:182–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wei M, Wan J, Hu Z, Peng Z, Wang B (2016) Enhanced photocatalytic degradation activity over TiO2 nanotubes co-sensitized by reduced graphene oxide and copper(II) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin. Appl Surf Sci 377:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Woan K, Pyrgiotakis G, Sigmund W (2009) Photocatalytic carbon-nanotube–TiO2 composites. Adv Mate 21(21):2233–2239Google Scholar
  100. Xia HL, Zhuang HS ,Zhang T, Xiao DC (2007) Photocatalytic degradation of acid blue 62 over CuO-SnO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst under simulated sunlight. J Environ Sci 19(9):1111–1141Google Scholar
  101. Xia D, An T, Li G, Wang W, Zhao H, Wong PK (2016a) Synergistic photocatalytic inactivation mechanisms of bacteria by graphene sheets grafted plasmonic Ag-AgX (X = Cl, Br, I) composite photocatalyst under visible light irradiation. Water Res 99:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Xia J, Di J, Li H, Xu H, Li H, Guo S (2016b) Ionic liquid-induced strategy for carbon quantum dots/BiOX (X = Br, Cl) hybrid nanosheets with superior visible light-driven photocatalysis. Appl Catal B 181:260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Xing M, Zhang J, Chen F, Tian B (2011) An economic method to prepare vacuum activated photocatalysts with high photo-activities and photosensitivities. Chem Commun 17Google Scholar
  104. Xing M, Li X, Zhang J (2014) Synergistic effect on the visible light activity of Ti3+ doped TiO2 nanorods/boron doped graphene composite. Sci Rep 4Google Scholar
  105. Xu SH, Feng DL, Li DX, Shang G, Wen F (2008) Preparation of magnetic photocatalyst TiO2 supported on NiFe2O4 and effect of magnetic carrier on photocatalytic activity. Chin J Chem 26(5):842–846Google Scholar
  106. Xu H, Wang C, Song Y, Zhu J, Xu Y, Yan J, Song Y, Li H (2014) CNT/Ag3PO4 composites with highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity and stability. Chem Eng J 241:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Xu T, Ni D, Chen X, Wu F, Ge P, Lu W, Hu H, Zhu Z, Chen W (2016a) Self-floating graphitic carbon nitride/zinc phthalocyanine nanofibers for photocatalytic degradation of contaminants. J Hazard Mater 317:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Xu X, Ming F, Hong J, Xie Y, Wang Z (2016b) Three-dimensional porous aerogel constructed by Bi2WO6 nanosheets and graphene with excellent visible-light photocatalytic performance. Mater Lett 179:52–56Google Scholar
  109. Yan H (2012) Soft-templating synthesis of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light. Chem Comm 28Google Scholar
  110. Yang MQ, Zhang N, Xu YJ (2013) Synthesis of fullerene–, carbon nanotube–, and graphene–TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalysts for selective oxidation: a comparative study. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(3):1156–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yamakoshi Y, Umezawa N, Ryu A, Arakane K, Miyata N, Goda Y, Masumizu T, Nagano T (2003) Active oxygen species generated from photoexcited fullerene (C60) as potential medicines: O2 -* versus 1O2. J Am Chem Soc 125(42):12803–12309Google Scholar
  112. Yao Z, Wang L, Zhang Y, Yu Z, Jiang Z (2014) Carbon nanotube modified Zn0.83Cd0.17S nanocomposite photocatalyst and its hydrogen production under visible-light. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39(28):15380–15386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Yu J, LowJ, Xiao W, Zhou P, Jaroniec M(2014) Enhanced photocatalytic CO2–reduction activity of anatase TiO2 by coexposed {001} and {101} facets. J Am Chem Soc136(25):8839–8842Google Scholar
  114. Yuan YJ, Tu JR, Ye ZJ, Chen DQ, Hu B, Huang YW, Chen TT, Cao DP, Yu ZT, Zou ZJ (2016) MoS2-graphene/ZnIn2S4 hierarchical microarchitectures with an electron transport bridge between light-harvesting semiconductor and cocatalyst: a highly efficient photocatalyst for solar hydrogen generation. Appl Catal B 188:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zhang X, Zhang L, Xie T, Wang D (2009) Low-temperature synthesis and high visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of BiOI/TiO2 heterostructures. J Phys Chem C 113(17):7371–7378Google Scholar
  116. Zhang H, Lv X, Li Y, Wang Y, Li J (2010) P25-graphene composite as a high performance photocatalyst. ACS Nano 4(1):380–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Zhang S, Arunachalam P, Abe T, Iyoda T, Nagai K (2012) Photocatalytic decomposition of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, aldehydes, and thiol by biphase and p/n junction-like organic semiconductor composite nanoparticles responsive to nearly full spectrum of visible light. J Photochem Photobiol A 244:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Zhang Y, Ma D, Wu J, Zhang Q, Xin Y, Bao N (2015) One–step preparation of CNTs/InVO4 hollow nanofibers by electrospinning and its photocatalytic performance under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 353:1260–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Zhang L, Bao Z, Yu X, Dai P, Zhu J, Wu M, Li G, Liu X, Sun Z, Chen C (2016a) Rational design of α-Fe2O3/reduced graphene oxide composites: rapid detection and effective removal of organic pollutants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(10):6431–6438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhang M, Luo W, Wei Z, Jiang W, Liu D, Zhu Y (2016b) Separation free C3N4/SiO2 hybrid hydrogels as high active photocatalysts for TOC removal. Appl Catal B 194:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zhang X, Qi Wang Q, Zou LH, You JW (2016c) Facile fabrication of titanium dioxide/fullerene nanocomposite and its enhanced visible photocatalytic activity. J Colloid Interface Sci 466:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhang Y, Xie C, Gu FL, Wu H, Guo Q (2016d) Significant visible-light photocatalytic enhancement in Rhodamine B degradation of silver orthophosphate via the hybridization of N-doped graphene and poly(3-hexylthiophene). J Hazard Mater 315:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zhao H, Chen S, Quan X, Yu H, Zhao H (2016) Integration of microfiltration and visible-light-driven photocatalysis on g-C3N4 nanosheet/reduced graphene oxide membrane for enhanced water treatment. Appl Catal B 104:134–140Google Scholar
  124. Zheng Y, Lin L, Ye X, Guo F, Wang X (2014) Helical graphitic carbon nitrides with photocatalytic and optical activities. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53(44):11926–11930Google Scholar
  125. Zhou Y, Wu Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Yang L, Wang L, Liu H, Li D, Luo Q (2016) The synthesis of 3D urchin-like TiO2-reduced graphene micro/nano structure composite and its enhanced photocatalytic properties. Ceram Int 42(10):12482–12489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations