Abstract
With the aim of democratizing access to justice, the Colombian legal system has recognized the importance of judicial precedent. Judicial precedent allows citizens to request judicial decisions based on previous sentences (court rulings). Some tools are provided to search these sentences. These tools are based on keywords and therefore the search may obtain many non-relevant results. The low efficacy of these tools may make it difficult to find the right sentence. Recently, an approach for sentences searching in the Colombian context was presented. This approach explores the full content of the sentences, which leads to high processing times. One solution to this problem may be to generate automatic summaries before performing the search. This paper presents a comparative analysis of algorithms for automatic summaries. The experimental evaluation shows promising results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Congreso de Colombia: Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Ley 1437 (2011)
Rama Judicial del Poder Publico: “Consulta temática simultánea en las Altas Corporaciones”, Sistema de Consulta de Jurisprudencia, (2011). http://190.24.134.114:8080/WebRelatoria/consulta/index.xhtml
Consejo de Estado: Consulta de Jurisprudencia - Consejo de Estado. http://190.24.134.114:8080/WebRelatoria/ce/index.xhtml
De Goytisolo, J.V.: “El razonamiento judicial”, Anales de la Real Academia de Jurisprudencia y Legislación, 39th edn. Madrid, 2009
De Colla Furquim, L.O., De Lima, V.L.S.: Clustering and categorization of Brazilian Portuguese legal documents. In: Caseli, H., Villavicencio, A., Teixeira, A., Perdigão, F. (eds.) PROPOR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7243, pp. 272–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_31
Raghuveer, K.: Legal documents clustering using latent dirichlet allocation. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 2(1), 34–37 (2012)
Lu, Q., Keenan, W., Conrad, J.G., Al-kofahi, K.: Legal document clustering with built-in topic segmentation categories and subject descriptors. In: Proceeding of 11th ACM Inernational Conerence on Information Knowedge Management, pp. 383–392 (2011)
Calambás, MA., Ordóñez, A., Chacón, A., Ordoñez, H.: Judicial precedents search supported by natural language processing and clustering. In: Computation Colombian Conference, vol. 10, pp. 372–377 (2015)
Visser, W.T., Wieling, M.B.: Sentence-based summarization of scientific documents. Design Implementation. Autumn Report. accessed 29 Nov (2007)
Sharifi, B., Hutton, M.-A., Kalita, J.K.: Experiments in microblog summarization. In: 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 49–56. IEEE (2010)
Farzindar, A., Lapalme, G.: LetSum: an automatic Legal Text Summarizing system. In: Legal Knowedge Information System JURIX, pp. 11–18 (2004)
Chieze, E., Farzindar, A., Lapalme, G.: An automatic system for summarization and information extraction of legal information. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS, vol. 6036, pp. 216–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_12
Apache Foundation, Apache Lucene: http://lucene.apache.org/core/ Accessed 10 Feb-2015
Torres Moreno, J.M.: Single-document summarization. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 59–60. MIT Press, London (2014)
Stanford University, The Stanford NLP (Natural Language Processing) Group
Stanford University, Dropping common terms: stop words
Stanford University, Stemming and lemmatization
Dozier, C., Kondadadi, R., Light, M., Vachher, A., Veeramachaneni, S., Wudali, R.: Named entity recognition and resolution in legal text. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS, vol. 6036, pp. 27–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_2
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceeding of 18th International Conference Machine Learning (ICML 2001), vol. 8, pp. 282–289 (2001)
Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 1, 496 (2008)
Belica, M.: sumy 0.4.0: Python Package Index
Edmundson, H.P.: New methods in automatic extracting. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 24–26. MIT Press, Cambdidge (1999)
Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 15–23. MIT Press, Cambdidge (1999)
Steinberger, J., Jezek, K.: Using latent semantic analysis in text summarization and summary evaluation. In: Proceeding of ISIM 2004, pp. 93–100 (2004)
Torres Moreno, J.M.: Latent semantic analysis in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 73–74, London (2014)
Torres Moreno, J.M.: Graph-based approaches in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 76–81, London (2014)
Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: Bringing order into texts (2004)
Erkan, G., Radev, D.R.: LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 22, 457–479 (2004)
Malmgren, D.: textract 1.4.0: Python Package Index
Inderjeet, M.: Summarization evaluation: an overview. Pflege Z. 62(6), 337–341 (2009)
Ganesan, K.: ROUGE 2.0 Documentation - Java Package for Evaluation of Summarization Tasks | Kavita Ganesan
Steinberger, J., Ježek, K.: Evaluation measures for text summarization. Comput. Inf. 28(2), 251–275 (2012)
Liu, F., Liu, Y.: Exploring correlation between ROUGE and human evaluation on meeting summaries. IEEE Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 18(1), 187–196 (2010)
Powers, D.: Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Factor to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. School Informatics Engineering vol. SIE-07–001, pp. 2–5 (2009)
Moens, M.F.: Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artif. Intell. Law 9(1), 29–57 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ordóñez, A., Belalcazar, D., Calambas, M., Chacón, A., Ordoñez, H., Cobos, C. (2017). Indexing and Searching of Judicial Precedents Using Automatic Summarization. In: Sidorov, G., Herrera-Alcántara, O. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10061. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62433-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62434-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)