Skip to main content

Indexing and Searching of Judicial Precedents Using Automatic Summarization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1396 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10061))

Abstract

With the aim of democratizing access to justice, the Colombian legal system has recognized the importance of judicial precedent. Judicial precedent allows citizens to request judicial decisions based on previous sentences (court rulings). Some tools are provided to search these sentences. These tools are based on keywords and therefore the search may obtain many non-relevant results. The low efficacy of these tools may make it difficult to find the right sentence. Recently, an approach for sentences searching in the Colombian context was presented. This approach explores the full content of the sentences, which leads to high processing times. One solution to this problem may be to generate automatic summaries before performing the search. This paper presents a comparative analysis of algorithms for automatic summaries. The experimental evaluation shows promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Congreso de Colombia: Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo. Ley 1437 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rama Judicial del Poder Publico: “Consulta temática simultánea en las Altas Corporaciones”, Sistema de Consulta de Jurisprudencia, (2011). http://190.24.134.114:8080/WebRelatoria/consulta/index.xhtml

  3. Consejo de Estado: Consulta de Jurisprudencia - Consejo de Estado. http://190.24.134.114:8080/WebRelatoria/ce/index.xhtml

  4. De Goytisolo, J.V.: “El razonamiento judicial”, Anales de la Real Academia de Jurisprudencia y Legislación, 39th edn. Madrid, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Colla Furquim, L.O., De Lima, V.L.S.: Clustering and categorization of Brazilian Portuguese legal documents. In: Caseli, H., Villavicencio, A., Teixeira, A., Perdigão, F. (eds.) PROPOR 2012. LNCS, vol. 7243, pp. 272–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-28885-2_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Raghuveer, K.: Legal documents clustering using latent dirichlet allocation. IAES Int. J. Artif. Intell. 2(1), 34–37 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu, Q., Keenan, W., Conrad, J.G., Al-kofahi, K.: Legal document clustering with built-in topic segmentation categories and subject descriptors. In: Proceeding of 11th ACM Inernational Conerence on Information Knowedge Management, pp. 383–392 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calambás, MA., Ordóñez, A., Chacón, A., Ordoñez, H.: Judicial precedents search supported by natural language processing and clustering. In: Computation Colombian Conference, vol. 10, pp. 372–377 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Visser, W.T., Wieling, M.B.: Sentence-based summarization of scientific documents. Design Implementation. Autumn Report. accessed 29 Nov (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharifi, B., Hutton, M.-A., Kalita, J.K.: Experiments in microblog summarization. In: 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 49–56. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Farzindar, A., Lapalme, G.: LetSum: an automatic Legal Text Summarizing system. In: Legal Knowedge Information System JURIX, pp. 11–18 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chieze, E., Farzindar, A., Lapalme, G.: An automatic system for summarization and information extraction of legal information. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS, vol. 6036, pp. 216–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Apache Foundation, Apache Lucene: http://lucene.apache.org/core/ Accessed 10 Feb-2015

  14. Torres Moreno, J.M.: Single-document summarization. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 59–60. MIT Press, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stanford University, The Stanford NLP (Natural Language Processing) Group

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stanford University, Dropping common terms: stop words

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford University, Stemming and lemmatization

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dozier, C., Kondadadi, R., Light, M., Vachher, A., Veeramachaneni, S., Wudali, R.: Named entity recognition and resolution in legal text. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS, vol. 6036, pp. 27–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., Pereira, F.C.N.: Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In: Proceeding of 18th International Conference Machine Learning (ICML 2001), vol. 8, pp. 282–289 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 1, 496 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Belica, M.: sumy 0.4.0: Python Package Index

    Google Scholar 

  22. Edmundson, H.P.: New methods in automatic extracting. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 24–26. MIT Press, Cambdidge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luhn, H.P.: The Automatic Creation of Literature Abstracts. In: Mani, I., Maybury, M.T. (eds.) Advances in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 15–23. MIT Press, Cambdidge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steinberger, J., Jezek, K.: Using latent semantic analysis in text summarization and summary evaluation. In: Proceeding of ISIM 2004, pp. 93–100 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Torres Moreno, J.M.: Latent semantic analysis in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 73–74, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Torres Moreno, J.M.: Graph-based approaches in Automatic Text Summarization, pp. 76–81, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mihalcea, R., Tarau, P.: TextRank: Bringing order into texts (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Erkan, G., Radev, D.R.: LexRank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 22, 457–479 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Malmgren, D.: textract 1.4.0: Python Package Index

    Google Scholar 

  30. Inderjeet, M.: Summarization evaluation: an overview. Pflege Z. 62(6), 337–341 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ganesan, K.: ROUGE 2.0 Documentation - Java Package for Evaluation of Summarization Tasks | Kavita Ganesan

    Google Scholar 

  32. Steinberger, J., Ježek, K.: Evaluation measures for text summarization. Comput. Inf. 28(2), 251–275 (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, F., Liu, Y.: Exploring correlation between ROUGE and human evaluation on meeting summaries. IEEE Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 18(1), 187–196 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Powers, D.: Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Factor to ROC, Informedness, Markedness and Correlation. School Informatics Engineering vol. SIE-07–001, pp. 2–5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moens, M.F.: Innovative techniques for legal text retrieval. Artif. Intell. Law 9(1), 29–57 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Armando Ordóñez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ordóñez, A., Belalcazar, D., Calambas, M., Chacón, A., Ordoñez, H., Cobos, C. (2017). Indexing and Searching of Judicial Precedents Using Automatic Summarization. In: Sidorov, G., Herrera-Alcántara, O. (eds) Advances in Computational Intelligence. MICAI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10061. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62434-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62433-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62434-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics