Skip to main content

Four Perspectives of Applied Sustainability: Research Implications and Possible Integrations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Abstract

How is applied sustainability being understood and implemented in academics’ and practitioners’ circles? Participants to the workshop “Sustainability Performance Assessment” within the ICCSA 2017 conference are confronted with this overarching question, which they address from their specific backgrounds and theoretical standpoints.

In this article, the organizers of the workshop first introduce the debate in which the workshop positions itself, and next offer a glimpse of how the main question can be addressed from four different academic perspectives and disciplines. The variety of perspectives here presented is only a small reflection of the broader diversity of themes and topics tackled by articles submitted to the workshop. Therefore, it provides the reader with an outlook over the wider academic debates that surround the sustainability concept, in a concerted effort to operationalize the concept itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Commission: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Energy 2020. A Strategy for Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Energy. COM, p. 639 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Republic of Lithuania: Operational Programme for the European Union Funds’ Investments in 2014–2020 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khasreen, M.M., Banfill, P.F.G., Menzies, G.F.: Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: a review. Sustainability 1, 674–701 (2009). doi:10.3390/su1030674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortiz, O., Castells, F., Sonnemann, G.: Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr. Build. Mater. 23, 28–39 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, K.H.: Corporate Sustainability and the Value of Corporations. Pakyoungsa, Seoul (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siegel, S.: Green management matters only if it yields more green: an economic/strategic perspective. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 23, 5–16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunt, C., Auster, E.: Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Manag. Rev. 31, 7–18 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Petruse, R.E., Grecu, V., Chiliban, B.M.: Augmented reality applications in the transition towards the sustainable organization. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 428–442. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Grecu, V., Nate, S.: Managing sustainability with eco-business intelligence instruments. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 6, 25–30 (2014). doi:10.2478/msd-2014-0003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Petrini, M., Pozzebon, M.: Managing sustainability with the support of business intelligence: Integrating socio-environmental indicators and organisational context. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 18, 178–191 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2009.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, C.M., Matthews, W.H. (eds.): Man’s impact on the global environment: assessment and recommendation for action. Report of the Study of Critical Environmental Problems (SCEP). MIT Press, Cambridge (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Westman, W.: How much are nature’s services worth? Science 197, 960–964 (1977). doi:10.1126/science.197.4307.960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ehrlich, P.R., Mooney, H.A.: Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. Bioscience 33, 248–254 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Daily, G.C.: Nature’s Services. Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson, M.J., Hall, D.M., Feldpausch-Parker, A.M., Peterson, T.R.: Obscuring ecosystem function with application of the ecosystem services concept. Conserv. Biol. 24, 113–119 (2010). doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01305.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C.: The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 69, 1209–1218 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sitas, N., Prozesky, H.E., Karen, J., Esler, K.J., Reyers, B.: Opportunities and challenges for mainstreaming ecosystem services in development planning: perspectives from a landscape level. Landscape Ecol. 29, 1315–1331 (2014). doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9952-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report (www.ipcc.ch), The United Nations Millennium Forum Declaration reports (www.un.org/millennium/declaration), Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Reports (www.milleniumassessment.org) and UNEP’s Fourth Global Environment Outlook: environment for development report (www.unep.org/geo/geo4/)

  19. UN Habitat: New urban agenda (2016). http://habitat3.org/the-new-urban-agenda/

  20. UNISDR: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNISDR, Geneva (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. UN Habitat: International Guidelines on Urban and Territorial Planning. United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat), Nairobi, Kenia (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. UN Habitat: Action Framework for Implementation of the New Urban Agenda (2017). http://nua.unhabitat.org/list1.htm

  23. Las Casas, G., Scorza, F.: A renewed rational approach between liquid society and anti-fragile planning. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications - ICCSA 2017. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A.: Verso una pianificazione antifragile [Towards Antifragile Planning]. FrancoAngeli, Milan (2016). ISBN 978-88-917-2775-6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Blečić, I., Cecchini, A.: On the antifragility of cities and of their buildings. City, Territ. Archit. 4, 3 (2017). doi:10.1186/s40410-016-0059-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Faludi, A.: A Decision-Centred View of Environmental Planning. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Casas, G.L., Scorza, F.: Sustainable planning: a methodological toolkit. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9786, pp. 627–635. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_53

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Bauman, Z.: Liquid Modernity. Politi Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scorza, F., Grecu, V.: Assessing sustainability: research directions and relevant issues. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9786, pp. 642–647. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This article refers to the scientific workshop proposal “Sustainability Performance Assessment: models, approaches and applications toward interdisciplinary and integrated solutions. SPA2017” promoted by the four authors in the framework of ICCSA 2017 Conference. The authors collaboratively designed this piece of work and jointly wrote Sects. 1 and 6, while individual contributions are provided in separate sections as follows: Jolanta Dvarioniene wrote Sect. 2, Valentin Grecu wrote Sect. 3, Sabrina Lai wrote Sect. 4, and Francesco Scorza wrote Sect. 5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Scorza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dvarioniene, J., Grecu, V., Lai, S., Scorza, F. (2017). Four Perspectives of Applied Sustainability: Research Implications and Possible Integrations. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10409. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62407-5_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62407-5_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62406-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62407-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics