Advertisement

An Estimate of Land Take in Municipal Planning of the Campania Region

  • Massimiliano BencardinoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10408)

Abstract

The issue of land take is characterized by analytical complexity and legislative effectiveness. So, in dealing with this question, several aspects have to be evaluated.

This project aims at a quantitative assessment of the municipal urban planning in terms of land take, in the context of the Campania region. To make this, the Master Plans of many municipalities are examined. Therefore, the housing needs outlined in the municipal Plans are compared with the trends in population growth. Through this analysis, the municipalities are classified into three groups: virtuous municipalities, growing municipalities e uncontrolled municipalities. Moreover, a quantitative analysis of urban planning standards is taken into account. Then, by describing the obtained results, this work tries to define a synoptic view of municipal planning in Campania region, its critical points and the contrasting actions that can be implemented in regional and national legislations.

Keywords

Land take Demographic changes Municipal plans Housing needs Large-area administration 

References

  1. 1.
    Bencardino M.: Land take and urban sprawl: drivers e contrasting policies. In: Bollettino, S.G.I. (ed.) Serie XIII, vol. VII(2), pp. 217–237. SGI, Roma (2015). ISSN: 1121-7820, http://societageografica.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/bencardino_eng.pdf
  2. 2.
    Arcidiacono, A., Di Simine, D., Oliva, F., Ronchi, S., Salata, S.: Rapporto 2016: Nuove sfide per il suolo. INU Edizioni, Roma (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bencardino, M.: Demographic changes and urban sprawl in two middle-sized cities of campania region (Italy). In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, Marina L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, Bernady O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9158, pp. 3–18. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21410-8_1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bencardino, M.: Un’analisi comparativa dello sprawl nei sistemi urbani di Avellino e Benevento. Bollettino AIC 157, 27–40 (2016). OpenstarTs, Trieste, doi:10.13137/2282-472X/13569, e-ISSN: 2282-472X. https://www.openstarts.units.it/dspace/handle/10077/13569
  5. 5.
    Bencardino, M., Valanzano, L.: Una misura dello sprawl urbano nelle aree interne della Campania: i casi di Benevento, Avellino e Battipaglia. In: Munafò, M., e Marchetti, M. (eds) Recuperiamo Terreno. Analisi e prospettive per la gestione sostenibile della risorsa suolo. Franco Angeli Editore, Milano, pp. 73–88 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bonora, P.: Atlante del consumo di suolo per un progetto di città metropolitana, Il caso Bologna. Baskerville, Bologna (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Centro di Ricerca sui Consumi di Suolo: Rapporto 2009. INU Edizioni, Roma (2009). http://consumosuolo.org/pubblicazioni/rapporti-crcs/
  8. 8.
    CRCS: Rapporto 2010. INU Edizioni, Roma (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    CRCS: Rapporto 2012. INU Edizioni, Roma (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CRCS: Rapporto 2014. INU Edizioni, Roma (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrara, A., Salvati, L., Sabbi, A., Colantoni, A.: Soil resources, land cover changes and rural areas: towards a spatial mismatch? Sci. Total Environ. 478, 116–122 (2014). Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.040
  12. 12.
    ISPRA: Il consumo di suolo in Italia – Edizione 2014, 195/2014. ISPRA Rapporti, Roma (2014). http://www.isprambiente.gov.it/it/pubblicazioni/rapporti/il-consumo-di-suolo-in-italia
  13. 13.
    ISPRA, Il consumo di suolo in Italia – Edizione 2015, 218. ISPRA Rapporti Roma (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISPRA, Consumo di suolo, dinamiche territoriali e servizi ecosistemici - Edizione 2016, 248. ISPRA Rapporti, Roma (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Munafò, M., Marchetti, M.: Recuperiamo terreno. FrancoAngeli, Milano (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salvati, L.: Monitoring high-quality soil consumption driven by urban pressure in a growing city (Rome, Italy). Cities, 31, 349–356 (2013). Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.11.001
  17. 17.
    Pileri P.: La frammentazione amministrativa consuma suolo. In: Convegno ISPRA, CRA e Università La Sapienza, Il Consumo di suolo, lo stato, le cause e gli impatti, 5 February 2013. ISPRA, Roma (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bencardino, M., Nesticò, A.: Demographic Changes and Real Estate Values. A Quantitative Model for Analyzing the Urban-Rural Linkages. Sustainability 9(4), 536 (2017). doi: 10.3390/su9040536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nesticò, A., Macchiaroli, M., Pipolo, O.: Costs and benefits in the recovery of historic buildings: the application of an economic model. Sustainability 7(11), 14661–14676 (2015). MDPI AG, Basel, doi: 10.3390/su71114661
  20. 20.
    Nesticò, A., Pipolo, O.: A protocol for sustainable building interventions: financial analysis and environmental effects. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Mining 10(3), 199–212 (2015). doi: 10.1504/IJBIDM.2015.071325. Inderscience Enterprises Ltd., GenèveCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Camagni, R., Gibelli, M.C., Rigamonti, P.: I costi collettivi della città dispersa. Alinea, Firenze (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Camagni, R., Modigliani, D.: La rendita fondiaria/immobiliare a Roma: 6 studi di caso, XXVIII Congresso INU - Istituto Nazionale di Urbanistica, Città come motore di sviluppo del Paese, Salerno, 24–26 ottobre 2013Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bencardino, M., Greco, I., Ladeira, P.R.: The Comparative Analysis of Urban Development in Two Geographic Regions: The State of Rio de Janeiro and the Campania Region. In: Murgante, B., Gervasi, O., Misra, S., Nedjah, N., Rocha, Ana Maria A.C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, Bernady O. (eds.) ICCSA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7334, pp. 548–564. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31075-1_41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bencardino, M., Greco, I.: Processes of adaptation and creation of a Territorial Governance. The experience of the cities of Benevento and Salerno (Campania region, Italy). J. Sociol. Study, 2(11), 819–833 (2012). ISSN: 2159-5526, David Publishing Company, USA, http://www.davidpublishing.com/show.html?11206
  25. 25.
    Regione Campania: La stima del fabbisogno abitativo e la definizione degli indirizzi per la determinazione dei pesi insediativi nei Ptcp” (2009). http://burc.regione.campania.it/eBurcWeb/directServlet?DOCUMENT_ID=41908&ATTACH_ID=53745
  26. 26.
    Luksas, S.: Demographic changes, housing policies and urban planning. Nordregio Working Paper, 4, 1–48 (2013). Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Prevost, A., Molines, N., Dehan, P., Bandet, J.: The urban planning of French cities and the challenge of sustainable town planning: improvement and limits. In: AESOP 26th Annual Congress, Ankara, Turkey, July 2012Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    SCOT de l’agglomération Lyonnaise: Rapport de presentation. https://www.scot-agglolyon.fr/espace-documentaire/
  29. 29.
    Bencardino, F., Greco, I.: Politiche di sviluppo regionale e assetto territoriale in Campania. Alcune riflessioni. Rivista Documenti Geografici, 2 (2016). doi: 10.19246/docugeo2281-7549/201602_02. DSSF, Università di Roma, Tor Vergata
  30. 30.
    Regione Campania: PTR Cartografia di Piano. http://www.sito.regione.cam-pania.it/PTR2006/PTRindex.htm

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political, Social and Communication SciencesUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations