Advertisement

A Concept of Unified E-Health Platform for Patient Communication and Monitoring

  • Suren AbrahamyanEmail author
  • Serob Balyan
  • Avetik Muradov
  • Natalia Kulabukhova
  • Vladimir Korkhov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10408)

Abstract

With the help of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC, which includes all types of communications except oral speech) and modern mobile technologies, it is possible to allow people with speech and language disorders to interact with each other and eliminate the relational barrier.

Also it could be important from doctors’ perspective to be informed about condition of patients with such disorders regardless location, make behavioral analysis and organize virtual concilia with other doctors.

So, the combination of this two ideas would allow to create a platform that would solve communication problem for disabled people from one side, and allow doctors to monitor patients’ communication, store medical records for organizing group discussions and diagnosis from another side.

In this article we suggest a concept of combination of described two approaches in one unified E-Health platform. We presented architecture of server and mobile applications, optimal choice of data storages and communication protocols for operating in one private network.

Keywords

E-Health AAC Real-time messaging Data storage Mobile communication Application server Communication protocols 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Research was carried out using computational resources provided by Resource Center “Computer Center of SPbU” (http://cc.spbu.ru).

References

  1. 1.
    American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: Augmentative and alternative communication: Knowledge and skills for service delivery. ASHA Leader 7(Suppl. 22), 97–106 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sasson, N.J., et al.: Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Sci. Rep. 6, 40700 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frost, L., Bondy, A.: PECS: The Picture Exchange Communication System. Pyramid Educational Consultants, Inc. (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newell, A.F., Carmichael, A., Gregor, P., Alm, N.: Information technology for cognitive support. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp. 464–481. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eikeseth, S., Hayward, D., Gale, C., Gitlesen, J.P., Eldevik, S.: Intensity of supervision and outcome for preschool aged children receiving early and intensive behavioral interventions: a preliminary study. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 3, 67–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eikeseth, S., Klintwall, L., Jahr, E., Karlsson, P.: Outcome for children with autism receiving early and intensive behavioral intervention in mainstream preschool and kindergarten settings. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 6, 829–835 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balyan, S., Abrahamyan, S., Ter-Minasyan, H., Waizenauer, A., Korkhov, V.: Distributed collaboration based on mobile infrastructure. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2015, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 9158, pp. 354–368. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-21410-8_28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balyan, S., Abrahamyan, S., Korkhov, V., Ter-Minasyan, H., Waizenauer, A.: Teambrainer: network-based collaborative mobile system. In: 2016 International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation (HPCS), Innsbruck, Austria, pp. 1009–1012. IEEE (2016). doi: 10.1109/HPCSim.2016.7568447
  9. 9.
    Avaz Homepage. http://www.avazapp.com/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  10. 10.
    Understand Me Homepage. http://understandme.su/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  11. 11.
    Keskinen, T., Heimonen, T., Turunen, M., Rajaniemi, J.-P., Kauppinen, S.: SymbolChat: picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. In: Miesenberger, K., Karshmer, A., Penaz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2012, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7383, pp. 279–286. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31534-3_43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ola Mundo Homepage. https://www.olamundo.com/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  13. 13.
    Guskov, V.P., Gushchanskiy, D.E., Kulabukhova, N.V., Abrahamyan, S., Balyan, S., Degtyarev, A.B., Bogdanov, A.V.: An interactive tool for developing distributed telemedicine systems. Comput. Res. Model. 7(3), 521–528 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balyan, S.G., Ralovets, R.V., Abrahamyan, S.A., Yuzhanin, N.V.: Functionalities of virtual cluster management system FishDirector and check of its efficiency. Control Process. Stab. 1(17), 283–288 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    MongoDB vs. SQL Server 2008 Performance Showdown. https://blog.michaelckennedy.net/2010/04/29/mongodb-vs-sql-server-2008-performance-showdown/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  16. 16.
    Is Postgres NoSQL Better than MongoDB? http://www.aptuz.com/blog/is-postgres-nosql-database-better-than-mongodb/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  17. 17.
    Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, UCI Website, Representational State Transfer (REST). http://www.ics.uci.edu/~fielding/pubs/dissertation/rest_arch_style.htm. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  18. 18.
    Conrad, T.: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL vs. Commercial Databases: It’s All About What You Need. DevX Journal. http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  19. 19.
    Ng Heng, L.: PostgreSQL [9.5.0] vs. MariaDB [10.1.11] vs. MySQL [5.7.0] year 2016. http://nghenglim.github.io/PostgreSQL-9.5.0-vs-MariaDB-10.1.11-vs-MySQL-5.7.0-year-2016/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  20. 20.
    Cattell, R.: Scalable SQL and NoSQL data stores. Newsl. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 39(4), 12–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    DB-Engines: Popularity Ranking of Database Management Systems. DB-Engines. http://db-engines.com/en/ranking/key-value+store. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  22. 22.
    Introducing JSON. http://www.json.org/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  23. 23.
    Li, Y., Manoharan, S.: A performance comparison of SQL and NoSQL databases. In: 2013 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PACRIM), pp. 15–19. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poat, M., Lauret, J., Betts, W.: POSIX and object distributed storage system – performance comparison studies and real-life usage in an experimental data taking context leveraging OpenStack/Ceph. In: 21st International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2015). IOP Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    MQTT Homepage. http://mqtt.org/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  26. 26.
    Mosca Homepage. http://www.mosca.io/. Last accessed 15 Apr 2017
  27. 27.
    Abrahamyan, S., Balyan, S., Muradov, A., Korkhov, V., Moskvicheva, A., Jakushkin, O.: Development of M-Health software for people with disabilities. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016, Part V. LNCS, vol. 9790, pp. 468–479. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-42092-9_36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suren Abrahamyan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Serob Balyan
    • 1
  • Avetik Muradov
    • 1
  • Natalia Kulabukhova
    • 1
  • Vladimir Korkhov
    • 1
  1. 1.Saint Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations