Skip to main content

Bayesian Neural Network Models in the Appraisal of Real Estate Properties

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017 (ICCSA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 10406))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Neural Networks (NNs) had wide interest due to empirical achievements on a wide range of learning issues. NNs are highly expressive models that can learn complex function approximations from input/output, with a particular ability to train them on massive data sets with stochastic optimization. The Bayesian approach to NNs can potentially avoid some of the problems of stochastic optimization. The use of Bayesian learning is well suited to the problem of real estate appraisals, in fact, Bayesian inference techniques are very interesting in order to deal with a small and noisy sample in the field of probabilistic inference carried out with neural model. For this purpose it has here been experimented a NNs model with Bayesian learning. The output distribution has been calculated operating a numerical integration on the weights space with the help of Markov Chain Hybrid Monte Carlo Method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the econometric appraisal of real estate prices the stochastic component is representative of the whole effect of the many disturbance factors which cannot be expressed through variables endogenous to the model. Such factors can be explained by: (1) the practical impossibility to assess the regression model with reference to the different samples drawn by the population of known-price sales; (2) the impossibility to quantify the influence of some important market factors (role of broker, contractual power in particular conditions, etc.) or institutional factors, for example, expectations related to fiscal charging, etc.; (3) the impossibility, once acknowledged the influence of a factor, to obtain quantitative information about it; (4) the need to use a number of explicative variables not too high also in relation to low sample size; (5) the chance that real estate sample is influenced by errors in the survey, as well as by random elements in the answers of interviewed (buyers, sellers and brokers).

  2. 2.

    In real estate valuations each error is representative of the difference between the real estate value obtained from the model and the corresponding price drawn on the market.

  3. 3.

    In the general case in which one does not hypothesize the independence of the observation, the problem becomes that of determining the conditional density of the target data p(t│x) conditioned on the input data.

  4. 4.

    The sum of quadratic-error function remains valid even if a parametric approach is used, and the interpolating function will have a pre-defined algebraical form and will be expressed as a function of the parameters characterizing the functional form itself. The individuation of the parameters set which make the coat function minimum is, as known, almost always linked to the use of the square minimum algorithm, while in the case of neural network the algorithm mostly used is the back-propagation.

  5. 5.

    All the deductive-axiomatic apparatus of the appraisal theory is based upon the hypothesis that the real estate sample is randomly drawn by a normal population referred to similar real estate sales with known price, and that with increasing of the sample dimension its distribution can be approximated to the normal [9]. Hardly ever these statistical hypothesis are mirrored in practice and this is because [33]: (a) the behaviour of the subjects which deal with the sampling hardly ever follows criteria which are based on random logic; (b) the atypicalness of real estate goods systematically invalidates the normal postulation of the population.

  6. 6.

    The maximum likelihood approach represent a particular approximation of which we only consider the most probable weights vector which corresponds to the distribution peak.

  7. 7.

    Different are the possible functions for the prior distribution of weights, see Buntine et al. [7] and Neal [37].

  8. 8.

    The problem of a very good balance between bias and variance in order to avoid overfitting phenomena by the training data suggests the choice of a function smooth network [2].

  9. 9.

    It is easy verify that, with α and β fixed, increasing the training set dimension the first is a representative term of the maximum likelihood, whereas the second is a representative term of the prior knowledge that decreases so that larger is the set and better the only term of maximum likelihood approximates the most probable weights distribution. Conversely for small data sets the role of the prior term in the determination of the most probable solution is essential [37].

  10. 10.

    The elaboration have been carried out with Netlab free software (Aston University, Birmingham).

References

  1. Brotman, B.A.: Linear and non linear appraisals models. Appraisal J. 58, 249–253 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, C.M.: Bayesian methods for neural networks, Technical report, Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Aston University, Birmingham (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, C.M.: Neural Network for Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop, C.M.: Neural network: a pattern recognition perspective. In: Fiesler, E., Beale, R. (eds.) Handbook of Neural Computation. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, C.M., Qazac, C.S., Regression with input-dependent noise: a bayesian treatment. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 9. MIT Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bottou, L.: Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Lechevallier, Y., Saporta, G. (eds.) Proceedings of COMPSTAT 2010, pp. 177–186. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Buntine, W.L., Weigend, A.S.: Bayesian back-propagation. Complex Syst. 5, 603–643 (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Child, P.D., Ott, S.H., Riddiough, T.J., Incomplete information, exercise policy and valuation of claims on noisy real assets, Discussion paper, MIT Real Estate Center, Cambridge, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P.: Undivided real estate shares: appraisal and interactions with capital markets. Appl. Mech. Mater. 584–586, 2522–2527 (2014). Trans Tech Pubblications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P.: Spatial analysis of residential real estate rental market. In: d’Amato, M., Kauko, T. (eds.) Advances in Automated Valuation Modeling. SSDC, vol. 86, pp. 9455–9459. Springer, Cham (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49746-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Forte, F.: The appraisal of office towers in bilateral monopoly’s market: evidence from application of Newton’s physical laws to the Directional Centre of Naples. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11(18), 9455–9459 (2016). R.I.P

    Google Scholar 

  12. Giudice, V., Evangelista, P., Paola, P., Forte, F.: Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital in the Logistics Service Industry. In: Lehner, F., Fteimi, N. (eds.) KSEM 2016. LNCS, vol. 9983, pp. 1–12. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47650-6_30

    Google Scholar 

  13. Giudice, V., Manganelli, B., Paola, P.: Depreciation Methods for Firm’s Assets. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9788, pp. 214–227. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42111-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Manganelli, B., Paola, P., Giudice, V.: Linear programming in a multi-criteria model for real estate appraisal. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9786, pp. 182–192. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-42085-1_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Giudice, V., Manganelli, B., Paola, P.: Spline smoothing for estimating hedonic housing price models. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Gavrilova, M.L., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O. (eds.) ICCSA 2015. LNCS, vol. 9157, pp. 210–219. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21470-2_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P.: Geoadditive models for property market. Appl. Mech. Mater. 584–586, 2505–2509 (2014). Trans Tech Pubblications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P.: The effects of noise pollution produced by road traffic of Naples Beltway on residential real estate values. Appl. Mech. Mater. 587–589, 2176–2182 (2014). Trans Tech Pubblications

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Manganelli, B., Forte, F.: The monetary valuation of environmental externalities through the analysis of real estate prices. Sustainability 9(2), 229 (2017). MDPI Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Cantisani, G.B.: Rough set theory for real estate appraisals: an application to directional district of Naples. Buildings 7(1), 12 (2017). MDPI Switzerland

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Cantisani, G.B.: Valuation of real estate investments through fuzzy logic. Buildings 7(1), 26 (2017). MDPI

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Forte, F.: Using genetic algorithms for real estate appraisal. Buildings 7(2), 31 (2017). MDPI

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Del Giudice, V., Manganelli, B., De Paola, P.: Hedonic analysis of housing sales prices with semiparametric methods. Int. J. Agri. Environ. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 65–77 (2017). IGI Global Publishing

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duane, S., Kennedy, A.D., Pendeleton, B.J., Roweth, D.: Hybrid Monte Carlo. Phys. Lett. B 195(2), 216–222 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fukunaga, K.: Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego (1990)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Graves, A.: Practical variational inference for neural networks. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 24, 2348–2356 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hinton, G., Camp, D.V.: Keeping neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 5–13 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2(5), 359–366 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jaynes, E.T.: Bayesian methods: general background. In: Justice, H.D. (eds.) Maximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Applied Statistics. Cambridge University Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jylanki, P., Nummenmaa, A., Vehtari, A.: Expectation propagation for neural networks with sparsity-promoting priors. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1849–1901 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Jordan, M.L., Bishop, C.M.: Neural networks. In: Tucker, A. (ed.) Handbook of Computer Science. CRC Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. MacKay, D.J.C.: Bayesian interpolation. Neural Comput. 4(3), 720–736 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. MacKay, D.J.C.: The evidence framework applied to classification networks. Neural Comput. 4(5), 720–736 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: The break-even analysis applied to urban renewal investments: a model to evaluate the share of social housing financially sustainable for private investors. Habitat Int. 59, 10–20 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Morano, P., Tajani, F.: Estimative analysis of a segment of the bare ownership market of residential property. In: Murgante, B., Misra, S., Carlini, M., Torre, C.M., Nguyen, H.-Q., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Gervasi, O. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7974, pp. 433–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39649-6_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Neal, R.M.: Bayesian training of back-propagation networks by the hybrid Monte Carlo method, Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Neal, R.M.: Probabilistic inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Canada (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Neal, R.M.: Bayesian learning for neural network, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Canada (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rumelhart, D.E., Hintont, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323(6088), 533–536 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Soudry, D., Hubara, I., Meir, R.: Expectation backpropagation: Parameter-free training of multilayer neural networks with continuous or discrete weights. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 27, 963–971 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  40. William, C.K.I., Qazac, C., Bishop, C.M., Zhu, H.: On the relationship between bayesian error bars and the input data density. In: Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, University of Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierfrancesco De Paola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Del Giudice, V., De Paola, P., Forte, F. (2017). Bayesian Neural Network Models in the Appraisal of Real Estate Properties. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. ICCSA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62397-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62398-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics