Advertisement

Flood Hazard Assessment of the Fortore River Downstream the Occhito Dam, in Southern Italy

  • Ciro ApollonioEmail author
  • Gabriella Balacco
  • Andrea Gioia
  • Vito Iacobellis
  • Alberto Ferruccio Piccinni
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10405)

Abstract

In recent decades the effects generated by human activity that have led to the reduction of the natural water retention capacity of the soil and those generated by climatic factors rapidly changing, have exacerbated the hydrogeological instability and amplified the national territory vulnerability. Despite the flood risk in Italy is a topic of great interest, there are several aspects, especially in the management of flood events, that require further investigation; examples are floods caused by dam discharge. In this paper the distribution of hazard areas in downstream of Occhito Dam, has been carried out. Several hazard scenarios were considered related to only dam discharge or relating to the simultaneous presence of the dam contribution and contributions from river basins downstream of the Occhito dam. The results, validated using flooding photo, are presented and discussed, providing flow-rate in order to predict potential floods.

Keywords

Floodplain mapping Dam Hydraulic model Hazard assessment Flood risk 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Regione Puglia – Settore Protezione Civile for funding this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Mo, C.X., Feng, J., Sun, G.K., Zhang, C., Ma, R.Y., Wu, X.R.: Study on flood control risk management for reservoir earth dam. In: 2009 1st International Conference on Information Science and Engineering, ICISE, Nanjing, China, 26–28 December 2009. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmad, F., Yahaya, A.S., Ali, M.M., Hussain, W.N.A.M.: Environmental risk assessment on hill site development in Penang, Malaysia: recommendations on management system. EJSR 40(3), 318–340 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koutroulis, A.G., Tsanis, I.K.: A method for estimating flash flood peak discharge in a poorly gauged basin: Case study for the 13–14 January 1994 flood, Giofiros basin, Crete, Greece. J. Hydrol. 385, 150–164 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, M.E.: Dodging a bullet: Lily Lake Dam and the 2013 Colorado flood. In: Association of State Dam Safety Officials Annual Conference 2014, Dam Safety 2014, San Diego, California – USA, pp. 512–522. Curran Associates, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manfreda, S., Nardi, F., Samela, C., Grimaldi, S., Taramasso, A.C., Roth, G., Sole, A.: Investigation on the use of geomorphic approaches for the delineation of flood prone areas. J. Hydrol. 517(863–876), 1694 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharif, H.O., Al-Juaidi, F.H., Al-Othman, A., Al-Dousary, I., Fadda, E., Jamal-Uddeen, S., Elhassan, A.: Flood hazards in an urbanizing watershed in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Geomat. Nat. Hazard Risk 7(2), 702–720 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novelli, A., Tarantino, E., Caradonna, G., Apollonio, C., Balacco, G., Piccinni, A.F.: Improving the ANN classification accuracy of landsat data through spectral indices and linear transformations (PCA and TCT) aimed at LU/LC monitoring of a River Basin. In: Gervasi, O., Murgante, B., Misra, S., Rocha, A.M.A.C., Torre, C.M., Taniar, D., Apduhan, B.O., Stankova, E., Wang, S. (eds.) 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Beijing, China, 4–7 July 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tarantino, E., Novelli, A., Laterza, M., Gioia, A.: Testing high spatial resolution WorldView-2 imagery for retrieving the leaf area index. In: Proceedings SPIE 9535, Proceedings of Third International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2015), p. 95351N (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skakun, S., Kussul, N., Shelestov, A., Kussul, O.: Flood hazard and flood risk assessment using a time series of satellite images: a case study in Namibia. Risk Anal. 34(8), 1521–1537 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nardi, F., Annis, A., Biscarini, C.: On the impact of urbanization on flood hydrology of small ungauged basins: the case study of the Tiber river tributary network within the city of Rome. J. Flood Risk Manage. (2015). doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12186
  11. 11.
    Apollonio, C., Balacco, G., Novelli, A., Tarantino, E., Piccinni, A.F.: Land use change impact on flooding areas: the case study of Cervaro Basin (Italy). Sustainability 8(10), 996 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarantino, E., Novelli, A., Aquilino, M., Figorito, B., Fratino, U.: Comparing the MLC and JavaNNS approaches in classifying multitemporal LANDSAT satellite imagery over an ephemeral river area. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Inf. Syst. 6, 83–102 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    IPCC: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 1–594. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2012). https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srex/SREX_Full_Report.pdf
  14. 14.
    Lawrence, J., Quade, D., Becker, J.: Integrating the effects of flood experience on risk perception with responses to changing climate risk. Nat. Hazards 74, 1773–1794 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, X., Tian, C., Meng, X., Xu, Q., Cui, G., Zhang, Q., Xiang, L.: Analyzing the effect of urbanization on flood characteristics at catchment levels. Proc. IAHS 370, 33–38 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giordano, R., D’Agostino, D., Apollonio, C., Scardigno, A., Pagano, A., Portoghese, I., Lamaddalena, N., Piccinni, A.F., Vurro, M.: Evaluating acceptability of groundwater protection measures under different agricultural policies. Agric. Water Manage. 147, 54–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Portoghese, I., D’Agostino, D., Giordano, R., Scardigno, A., Apollonio, C., Vurro, M.: An integrated modelling tool to evaluate the acceptability of irrigation constraint measures for groundwater protection. Environ. Model Softw. 46, 90–103 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giordano, R., D’Agostino, D., Apollonio, C., Lamaddalena, N., Vurro, M.: Bayesian belief network to support conflict analysis for groundwater protection: the case of the Apulia region. J. Environ. Manage. 115, 136–146 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Winsemius, H.C., Van Beek, L.P.H., Jongman, B., Ward, P.J., Bouwman, A.: A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 1871–1892 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Flood Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32007L0060
  21. 21.
    Directive of the President of the Council of Ministers: Indirizzi operativi per la gestione organizzativa e funzionale del sistema di allertamento nazionale, statale e regionale per il rischio idrogeologico e idraulico ai fini di protezione civile. Official Journal of 11 Marzo 2004 n. 59, 1–17, (in Italian). http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/jcms/it/view_prov.wp?contentId=LEG21144
  22. 22.
    Granata, F., Gargano, R., de Marinis, G.: Support vector regression for rainfall-runoff modeling in urban drainage: a comparison with the EPA’s storm water management model. Water 8(3), 69 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, J., Li, H., Zhai, J., Zhu, Y., Li, J.: Impact of land use on frequency of floods in Yongding River Basin, China. Water 8, 401 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manfreda, S., Samela, C., Gioia, A., Consoli, G.G., Iacobellis, V., Giuzio, L., Cantisani, A., Sole, A.: Flood-prone areas assessment using linear binary classifiers based on flood maps obtained from 1D and 2D hydraulic models. Nat. Hazards 79, 735–754 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nardi, F., Vivoni, E.R., Grimaldi, S.: Investigating a floodplain scaling relation using a hydrogeomorphic delineation method. Water Resour. Res. 42, W09409 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim, J., Kuwahara, Y., Kumar, M.: A DEM-based evaluation of potential flood risk to enhance decision support system for safe evacuation. Nat. Hazards 59(3), 1561–1572 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Arcangeletti, E., Nardi, F.: Flood mapping in ungauged basins using fully continuous hydrologic–hydraulic modeling. J. Hydrol. 487, 39–47 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iacobellis, V., Castorani, A., Di Santo, A.R., Gioia, A.: Rationale for flood prediction in karst endorheic areas. J. Arid Environ. 112(A), 98–108 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Horritt, M.S., Di Baldassarre, G., Bates, P.D., Brath, A.: Comparing the performance of a 2-D finite element and a 2-D finite volume model of floodplain inundation using airborne SAR imagery. Hydrol. Process. 21, 2745–2759 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    French, J.R.: Airborne LiDAR in support of geomorphological and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surf. Proc. Land. 28, 321–335 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nardi, F., Grimaldi, S., Santini, M., Petroselli, A., Ubertini, L.: Hydrogeomorphic properties of simulated drainage patterns using digital elevation models: the flat area issue. Hydrol. Sci. J. 53, 1–18 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frappart, F., Seyler, F., Martinez, J.M., Leόn, J.G., Cazenave, A.: Floodplain water storage in the Negro River basin estimated from microwave remote sensing of inundation area and water levels. Remote Sens. Environ. 99(4), 387–399 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Domeneghetti, A., Tarpanelli, A., Brocca, L., Barbetta, S., Moramarco, T., Castellarin, A., Brath, A.: The use of remote sensing-derived water surface data for hydraulic model calibration. Remote Sens. Environ. 149, 130–141 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Iacobellis, V., Gioia, A., Milella, P., Satalino, G., Balenzano, A., Mattia, F.: Inter-comparison of hydrological model simulations with time series of SAR-derived soil moisture maps. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 46, 739–757 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cobby, D.M., Mason, D.C., Davenport, I.J.: Image processing of airborne scanning laser altimetry data for improved river flood modeling. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 56(2), 121–138 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Di Baldassarre, G., Schumann, G., Bates, P.D., Freer, J.E., Beven, K.J.: Flood-plain mapping: a critical discussion of deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Hydrol. Sci. J. 55(3), 364–376 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Measures, R.M.: Laser Remote Sensing: Fundamentals and Applications. Krieger Publishing, Melbourne (1991)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lillycrop, W.J., Irisch, J.L., Parson, L.E.: SHOALS system: three years of operation with airborne lidar bathymetry - experiences, capability and technology advancements. Sea Technol. 38, 17–25 (1997)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gomes Pereira, L.M., Wicherson, R.J.: Suitability of laser data for deriving geographical information. A case study in the context of management of fluvial zones. ISPRS 54, 105–114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Merz, B., Hall, J., Disse, M., Schumann, A.: Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10, 509–527 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bates, P.D.: Remote sensing and flood inundation modelling. Hydrol. Process. 18, 2593–2597 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bates, P.D., Horritt, M.S., Aronica, G., Beven, K.: Bayesian updating of flood inundation likelihoods conditioned on flood extent data. Hydrol. Process. 18, 3347–3370 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Montanari, A.: What do we mean by uncertainty? The need for a consistent wording about uncertainty assessment in hydrology. Hydrol. Process. 21, 841–845 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    O’Brien, J.: FLO-2D Users Manual. FLO-2D Inc., Nutrioso (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Giordano, R., Milella, P., Portoghese, I., Vurro, M., Apollonio, C., D’Agostino, D., Lamaddalena, N., Scardigno, A., Piccinni, A.: An innovative monitoring system for sustainable management of groundwater resources: objectives, stakeholder acceptability and implementation strategy. In: Proceedings of Environmental Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS), IEEE Workshop, Taranto, Italy, pp. 32–37 (2010)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Piccinni, A.F., Iacobellis, V., Laricchia, V., Apollonio, C., Gigante, V., Gioia, A.: Piano di laminazione della diga di Occhito sul fiume Fortore – Final report (2009)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Autorità di Bacino dei Fiumi Trigno, Biferno e Minori, Saccione e Fortore, Piano Stralcio per l’Assetto Idrogeologico del Bacino Interregionale del fiume Fortore - Relazione generale (2005). http://adbpcn.regione.molise.it/autorita_old/pdf/rg/fortore.pdf
  48. 48.
    Ward, A.D., Elliot, W.J.: Environmental Hydrology. CRC Press and LLC, Boca Raton and Florida (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, del Territorio, Edile e di ChimicaPolitecnico di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations