Skip to main content

Integrated Engineering Approach to Safety, Reliability, Risk Management and Human Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

Abstract

Nuclear industry has important engineering legacies to share with the conventional industry. As a result of nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, many countries have incorporated new steps into the licensing processes of Nuclear Power Plants (NPP), in order to manage accident risks. Probabilistic Safety Analysis has been used for improving safety, reliability and availability in the design and operation of NPP. Despite the close association between these subjects, there are some important different approaches. The reliability engineering approach uses several principles and criteria to minimize the component failures. These include, for instance, redundancy, diversity, and standby systems. System safety is primarily concerned with risk management, that is, the evaluation and control of hazards, which requires the assessment of interactions among system components. Events that cause accidents can be complex combinations of component or instrumentation failures, faulty maintenance, design errors, or human actions. Then, system safety deals with a broader spectrum of risk management, including human factors (ergonomics), licensing requirements, and quality control. Taking care of these topics individually can compromise the completeness of the analysis and the measures associated to risk reduction, and increasing safety and reliability. This chapter presents an integrated framework for analyzing engineering systems, operational procedures, and the human factors based on the application of systems theory. An application example assessing safety, reliability, risk, and human factors issues related to a complex task of Non-destructive Inspection of piping segments of a primary circuit of a NPP shows the benefits of using the proposed integrated approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ANS. American Nuclear Society (2016) Glossary of definitions and terminology. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, 186 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Boring RL (2012) Fifty years of THERP and human reliability analysis. Proceedings of the 11th probabilistic safety assessment and management conference. International—PSAM11, Idaho Falls, ID, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Calixto E (2013) Gas and oil reliability engineering. Modeling and analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 545 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen FM, Andersen O, Duijm NJ, Harremoës P (2003) Risk terminology—a platform for common understanding and better communication. J Hazard Mater 103:181–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox S, Tait R (1998) Safety, reliability and risk management: an integrated approach, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 325 p

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROCONTROL. European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation (2004) The human factors case: guidance for human factors integration—HRS/HIS-003-GUI-01. Brétigny, 114 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg JE, Nirmark J (2008) Risk-informed assessment of Defence-in-depth, LOCA example phase 1: mapping of conditions and definition of quantitative measures for the Defence-in-depth levels. Rev 0. VTT Technical Research Centre, Espoo, Finland, 42 p (SKI Report 2008:33)

    Google Scholar 

  • HSE. Health and Safety Executive (2017) Principles and guidelines to assist HSE in its Judgements that duty-holders have reduced risk as low as reasonably practicable. Retrieved 7 Apr 2017, from http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarp1.htm

  • IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (2001) Risk management: a tool for improving nuclear power plant performance. Vienna, 88 p (IAEA-TECDOC-1209)

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Deterministic safety analysis of nuclear power plants. Specific Safety Guide No SSG-2. Vienna, 84 p

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (2012). IAEA report on protection against extreme earthquakes and tsunamis in the light of accident of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. International Expert Meeting. Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (2016a) Safety glossary terminology used in nuclear safety and radiation protection. Vienna, 219 p

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEA. International Atomic Energy Agency (2016b) Leadership and management for safety. General Safety Requirements No. GSR Part 2. Vienna (STI/PUB/175)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees FP (2012) Loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control, 4th.edn, 3 vol. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobley RK, Higgins LR, Wikoff DJ (2008) Maintenance engineering handbook, 7th edn. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, 1244 p

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS & USNRC. National Academy of Sciences and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2014) Lessons learned from the Fukushima nuclear accident for improving safety of U.S nuclear plants. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 394 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Parris DH (1988) Human performance in non-destructive inspections and functional tests. EPRI NP-6052. Final Report. Palo Alto, CA, October

    Google Scholar 

  • ReliaSoft (2015) System analysis reference: reliability, availability and optimization. ReliaSoft Publishing, Tucson, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares WA, Vasconcelos V, Rabello EG (2015) Risk-based inspection in the context of nuclear power plants. Proceedings of the International Nuclear Atlantic Conference—INAC 2011, São Paulo, October 4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatelatos M (2002) Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners—version 1.1. Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, NASA Headquarters, Washington DC, 323 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton N, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick H (2005) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 685 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Su X, Mahadevan S, Xu P, Deng Y (2015) Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using evidence theory and AHP. Risk Anal 35(7). doi:10.1111/risa.12347

  • Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (1975) WASH-1400—Reactor Safety Study, NUREG-75/014, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2001) Integrated safety analysis—guidance document. NUREG-1513. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Washington, DC, 65 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2005) Good Practices for implementing Human Reliability Analysis (HRA). NUREG-1792. Washington, DC, 103 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2011) An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant specific changes to the licensing basis. Regulatory Guide 1.174—Revision 2. Washington, DC, 37 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2013) Glossary of risk-related terms in support of risk-informed decision-making. NUREG 2122. Washington, DC, 187 p

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2017) Full-text glossary. Retrieved 31 Mar 2017 from https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/basic-ref/glossary/full-text.html

  • Vasconcelos V, Silva EMP, Reis SC, Costa ACL (2009). Safety, reliability, risk management and human factors: an integrated engineering approach applied to nuclear facilities. Proceedings of the International Nuclear Atlantic Conference—INAC 2009, Rio de Janeiro, , September 27–October 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasconcelos V, Soares WA, Costa ACL, Rabello EG, Marques RO (2016) Evaluation of piping reliability and failure data for use in risk-based inspections of nuclear power plants. Proceedings of “Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia e Ciência dos Materiais”, 12th CBECIMAT, Natal, November 6–10

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. World Health Organization (2004) IPCS risk assessment terminology. International Programme on Chemical Safety (ICPS). World Health Organization, Geneva, 122 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Deng X, Deng Y, Mahadevan S (2017) Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis based on D numbers and AHP. Nucl Eng Des 313:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the following Brazilian institutions that supported the writing of this chapter: Nuclear Technology Development Center (CDTN), Brazilian Nuclear Energy Commission (CNEN), Financier of Studies and Projects (FINEP), Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), and Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Development (FAPEMIG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanderley de Vasconcelos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Vasconcelos, V., Soares, W.A., Marques, R.O. (2018). Integrated Engineering Approach to Safety, Reliability, Risk Management and Human Factors. In: De Felice, F., Petrillo, A. (eds) Human Factors and Reliability Engineering for Safety and Security in Critical Infrastructures. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62319-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62319-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62318-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62319-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics