Skip to main content

Transitory and Permanent Components of the Exchange Rate Volatility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 476 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter decomposes aggregate exchange rate volatility into permanent and transitory volatility components and determines their shock effects on the macroeconomy. What would have happened to the growth of gross value added by the manufacturing sector in the absence of elevated South African economic policy uncertainty changes to positive exchange rate volatility shocks? We find that an unexpected positive shock to aggregate and permanent exchange rate volatility depresses output for longer periods. But leads to a decline in inflation and repo rate consistent with the predictions of the Taylor rule and the Phillips curve. This evidence confirms that exchange rate volatilities and other policy uncertainties are indeed demand shocks and monetary policy has a role to mitigate the adverse effects. With respect to transitory exchange rate volatility shocks, we find that they are accompanied by unresponsive inflation and an insignificant decline in the repo rate. Aggregate exchange rate volatility explains more fluctuations in economic growth than permanent and transitory exchange rate volatilities. The contributions of aggregate and permanent exchange rate volatility components were a severe drag on economic growth, particularly during the recession in 2009. Therefore, the policy implication is that in the immediate aftermath of an exchange rate shock, it is critical to distinguish the relative contributions of the transitory and permanent components of shocks on the economic outlook. Counterfactual evidence shows that elevated South African economic policy uncertainty accentuated the decline in manufacturing sector gross value added following positive exchange rate volatility shocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For instance, Dixit and Pindyck (1994) offered a theoretical case for the impact of high uncertainty on economic activity using the option value model, in which firms optimally adopt a wait-and-see approach when faced with high uncertainty, curtailing investment and hiring, and this retards economic growth.

  2. 2.

    Obstfeld and Rogoff (1998) argue that exchange rate volatility can affect households negatively through direct and indirect channels. The direct channel assumes that households and firms dislike exchange rate fluctuations and hence exchange rate volatility can have undesirable effects on their consumption and leisure decisions. Trade could fall in due to exchange rate uncertainty, and this could result in decline in production or income at home and foreign country and eventually aggregate consumption.

  3. 3.

    Grossmann and Orlov (2014) point out that the transitory (high) frequency component may be associated with short-term trading activity and often it changes with short periods.

  4. 4.

    The model diagnostics though not presented here indicate that the model is adequately estimated and the coefficients are statistically significant.

  5. 5.

    Grossman et al. (2014); Ganguly and Breuer (2010) conclude that interest rate changes have a stabilising effect on the residuals of volatilities of the nominal exchange rate, particularly in developing countries.

  6. 6.

    The FAVAR approach combines the standard VAR analysis with factor analysis. It is a quantitative attempt to condition VAR analyses of policy on richer information sets, without necessarily giving up the statistical advantages of restricting the analysis to a small number of variables. For further details, see for example, Stock and Watson (2002), Bernanke and Boivin (2003), Bernanke et al. (2004) amongst others.

  7. 7.

    They adjust their forecasts for inflation and economic outlook.

  8. 8.

    See IMF WEO January 2015.

References

  • Alexander, Sidney. (1952). Effects of devaluation on trade balance. IMF Staff Paper, 3, 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Kutan, A. M., & Xi, D. (2015). Does exchange rate volatility hurt domestic consumption? Evidence from emerging economies. International Economies, 144, 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., & Boivin, J. (2003). Monetary Policy In A Data-Rich Environment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 525–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B. S., Boivin, J., & Eliasz, P. (2004). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: A factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. NBER Working Paper Series. (Working Paper No. 10220).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Floetotto, M., Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Terry, S. (2013). Really Uncertain Business Cycles. CEP Discussion Papers dp1195. Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonciani, D., & Van Roye, B. (2013). Uncertainty shocks, banking frictions, and economic activity. Kiel Working Papers 1843. Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. (2011). The interrelationship between exchange rate uncertainty and unemployment uncertainty and unemployment for South Korea and Taiwan: Evidence from vector autoregressive approach. International Economics, 125, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Grauwe, P. (1988). Exchange rate variability and the slowdown in the growth of international trade. IMF Staff Papers, 35, 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., & Pindcky, R. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly, S., & Breuer, J. (2010). Nominal Exchange Rate Volatility, Relative Price Volatility, and the Real Exchange Rate. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29(5), 840–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, A., & Orlov, A. G. (2014). A panel-regressions investigation of exchange rate volatility. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 19(4), 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Panizza, U., & Rigobon, R. (2006). The long run puzzle of the real exchange rate. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25, 93–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlatshwayo, S., & Saxegaard, M. (2016). The Consequence of Policy Uncertainty: Disconnects and Dilutions in the South African Real Effective Exchange Rate-Export Relationship. IMF Working Paper WP/16/113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1998). Risk and exchange rates. (NBER Working Paper No. 6694). NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2002). Forecasting Using Principal Components from a Large Number of Predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 1167–1179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eliphas Ndou .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ndou, E., Gumata, N., Ncube, M. (2017). Transitory and Permanent Components of the Exchange Rate Volatility. In: Global Economic Uncertainties and Exchange Rate Shocks. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62280-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62280-4_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62279-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62280-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics