Skip to main content

Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a procedure that is now more commonly offered to patients with testicular cancer. Nevertheless, this procedure is technically challenging and is not routinely performed. This chapter will describe the prevention and management of all possible complications that may arise from robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a stepwise fashion. Since the most effective way to deal with any complication is to avoid it, this chapter will dedicate a significant portion of its content to describe the proper surgical technique that will help achieve this aim. Additionally, the current status of perioperative outcomes and complications will be reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

IMA:

Inferior mesenteric artery

IVC:

Inferior Vena Cava

LN:

Lymph Nodes

RARPLND:

Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection

References

  1. Cheney SM, Andrews PE, Leibovich BC, Castle EP. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: technique and initial case series of 18 patients. BJU Int. 2015;115(1):114–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harris KT, Gorin MA, Ball MW, Pierorazio PM, Allaf ME. A comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. BJU Int. 2015;116(6):920–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stepanian S, Patel M, Porter J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: evolution of the technique. Eur Urol. 2016;5(16):00385–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pearce SM, Golan S, Gorin MA, Luckenbaugh AN, Williams SB, Ward JF, et al. Safety and early oncologic effectiveness of primary robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous germ cell testicular cancer. Eur Urol. 2016;24(16):30181–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lauritsen J, Kier MG, Bandak M, Mortensen MS, Thomsen FB, Mortensen J, et al. Pulmonary function in patients with germ cell cancer treated with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(13):1492–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Necchi A, Miceli R, Oualla K, Sonpavde G, Giannatempo P, Raggi D, et al. Effect of bleomycin administration on the development of pulmonary toxicity in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors receiving first-line chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;8(16):30255.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roncolato FT, Chatfield M, Houghton B, Toner G, Stockler M, Thomson D, et al. The effect of pulmonary function testing on bleomycin dosing in germ cell tumours. Intern Med J. 2016;46(8):893–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson RM. Pulmonary oxygen toxicity. Chest. 1985;88(6):900–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Subramanian VS, Nguyen CT, Stephenson AJ, Klein EA. Complications of open primary and post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. Urol Oncol. 2010;28(5):504–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Forrest JB, Clemens JQ, Finamore P, Leveillee R, Lippert M, Pisters L, et al. AUA best practice statement for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing urologic surgery. J Urol. 2009;181(3):1170–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolf JS Jr, Bennett CJ, Dmochowski RR, Hollenbeck BK, Pearle MS, Schaeffer AJ. Best practice policy statement on urologic surgery antimicrobial prophylaxis. J Urol. 2008;179(4):1379–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Akhavan A, Gainsburg DM, Stock JA. Complications associated with patient positioning in urologic surgery. Urology. 2010;76(6):1309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pariser JJ, Pearce SM, Patel SG, Anderson BB, Packiam VT, Shalhav AL, et al. Rhabdomyolysis after major urologic surgery: epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes. Urology. 2015;85(6):1328–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pemberton RJ, Tolley DA, van Velthoven RF. Prevention and management of complications in urological laparoscopic port site placement. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):958–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdul-Muhsin HM, L’Esperance JO, Fischer K, Woods ME, Porter JR, Castle EP. Robot-assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2015;112(7):736–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiel R, Adams JB, Schulam PG, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Venous dissection injuries during laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol. 1996;155(6):1874–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bahnson RR, Andriole GL, Clayman RV, Catalona WJ. Catecholamine excess: probable cause of postoperative tachycardia following retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1989;42(2):132–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kenney PA, Tuerk IA. Complications of laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer. World J Urol. 2008;26(6):561–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams SB, McDermott DW, Winston D, Bahnson E, Berry AM, Steele GS, et al. Morbidity of open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: contemporary perioperative data. BJU Int. 2010;105(7):918–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Evans JG, Spiess PE, Kamat AM, Wood CG, Hernandez M, Pettaway CA, et al. Chylous ascites after post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: review of the M. D. Anderson experience. J Urol. 2006;176(4 Pt 1):1463–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Baniel J, Foster RS, Rowland RG, Bihrle R, Donohue JP. Management of chylous ascites after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer. J Urol. 1993;150(5 Pt 1):1422–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-Busafi SA, Ghali P, Deschenes M, Wong P. Chylous ascites: evaluation and management. ISRN Hepatol. 2014;3:240473.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Abdul-Muhsin H, Marshall M, Stroup S, L’Esperance J, Woods M, Porter J, et al. MP81-16 perioperative and early oncological outcomes following robot assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for testicular cancer: a multi-institutional study. J Urol. 195(4):e1059.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erik P. Castle MD, FACS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Abdul-Muhsin, H.M., L’esperance, J.O., Woods, M.E., Castle, E.P. (2018). Robot-Assisted Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy. In: Sotelo, R., Arriaga, J., Aron, M. (eds) Complications in Robotic Urologic Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62277-4_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62276-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62277-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics