Advertisement

Europe in Irish Prisons: Not Quite the ‘Good European’

  • Claire Hamilton
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology book series (PSIPP)

Abstract

While historically the incorporation of the ECHR in Ireland has met with some complacency, the influence of European human rights norms and standards has been palpable in some areas of penal policy, namely, prisoner voting and (to a lesser degree) the investigation of prisoner deaths. In this regard, Ireland may be regarded as more willing than its closest neighbour, the UK, to engage in a process of ‘controlled liberalisation’ or tactical concession to forestall potential criticisms. On the other hand, several areas of penal policy such as the law and policy on parole continue to highlight the jurisdiction’s resistance to European human rights norms. This chapter discusses these and other developments from the perspective of a small jurisdiction which, perhaps counterintuitively (given suggestions in the research that smaller jurisdictions may be more likely to adopt criminal justice changes from elsewhere), has not always taken its cue in matters of penal policy from the European model.

Keywords

Ireland ECHR & ECtHR ‘Controlled liberalisation’ Resistance 

Literature

  1. Behan, C. 2014. Embracing and Resisting Prisoner Enfranchisement: A Comparative Analysis of the Republic of Ireland and the United Kingdom. Irish Probation Journal 11 (October): 156–176.Google Scholar
  2. Behan, C., and I. O’Donnell. 2008. Prisoners, Politics and the Polls: Enfranchisement and the Burden of Responsibility. British Journal of Criminology 48 (3): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daems, T., D. van Zyl Smit, and S. Snacken, eds. 2013. European Penology? Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Doyle, O., and D. Ryan. 2011. Judicial Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003: Reflections and Analysis. Dublin University Law Journal 33: 369–392.Google Scholar
  5. Farrell, M. 2013. 10 Years on Ireland’s Human Rights Act Has Failed to Deliver. The Journal, December 29. http://www.thejournal.ie/readme/10-years-on-irelands-human-rights-act-has-failed-to-deliver-1236617-Dec2013/#comments
  6. Fitzgerald, F. 2015. Opening Comments: Securing Responsibility in the Prison Service. Irish Penal Reform Trust Conference 2015: Securing Accountability, Dublin, September 27. http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Pages/SP15000615
  7. Gostin, L., and M. Staunton. 1985. The Case for Prison Standards: Conditions of Confinement, Segregation and Medical Treatment. In Accountability and Prisons: Opening Up a Closed World, ed. M. Maguire, J. Vagg, and R. Morgan, 81–96. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  8. Griffin, D. 2015. The Release and Recall of Life Sentence Prisoners: Policy, Practice and Politics. Irish Jurist 53: 1–35.Google Scholar
  9. Griffin, D., and I. O’Donnell. 2012. The Life Sentence and Parole. British Journal of Criminology 52 (3): 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton, C. 2009. Detention. In ECHR and Irish Law, ed. U. Kilkelly, 2nd ed. Bristol: Jordan Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. ———. C. 2014. Reconceptualising Penality: A Comparative Perspective on Punitiveness in Ireland, Scotland and New Zealand. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2015. Penal Policy in Ireland: Notes from a Small Country. In Routledge Handbook of Irish Criminology, ed. C. Hamilton, D. Healy, Y. Daly, and M. Butler, 450–466. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Hamilton, C., and U. Kilkelly. 2009. Detention. In The ECHR and Irish Law, ed. U. Kilkelly, 2nd ed., 277–304. Bristol: Jordans.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, C., and R. Lines. 2009. Prisoner Voting Rights in Ireland. In Democracy and Punishment: International Perspectives in Criminal Disenfranchisement, ed. A. Ewald and B. Rottingham, 205–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Healy, D. 2012. Advise, Assist and Befriend: Can Probation Supervision Support Desistance? Social Policy and Administration 46 (4): 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Healy, D., and I. O’Donnell. 2005. Probation in the Republic of Ireland: Context and Challenges. Probation Journal 52 (1): 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrick, L. 2009. Prisoners’ Rights. In The ECHR and Irish Law, ed. U. Kilkelly, 2nd ed., 325–352. Bristol: Jordans.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2010. Fresh Challenge to Slopping Out May Follow Court Ruling. Irish Times, July 26.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2011a. Guest Blog, Liam Herrick, Director Irish Penal Reform Trust: The Prospects for Prison Law in Ireland. December 1. http://www.kodlyons.ie/index.php/news/single/guest_blog_liam_herrick_director_irish_penal_reform_trust
  20. ———. 2011b. Human Rights in Prison. IHRC/Law Society Conference, Ireland’s Human Rights Record Under the Spotlight, Law Society of Ireland, Blackhall Place, Dublin. October 22. http://www.ihrec.ie/download/pdf/liam_herrick_irish_penal_reform_trust.pdf
  21. Inspector of Prisons. 2013. Annual Report 2012. Nenagh: Office of the Inspector of Prisons.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2014. An Overview of the Mountjoy Prison Campus with a Particular Emphasis on the Separation Unit. Nenagh: Office of the Inspector of Prisons.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2016. Review, Evaluation and Analysis of the Operation of the Operation of the Present Irish Prison Service Prisoner Complaints Procedure. Nenagh: Office of the Inspector of Prisons.Google Scholar
  24. International Centre of Prison Studies (ICPS). 2016. World Prison Brief. http://www.prisonstudies.org/world-prison-brief
  25. Irish Penal Reform Trust (IPRT). 2010. IPRT Disappointed at Slopping Out Decision. July 14. http://www.iprt.ie/contents/1750
  26. ———. 2011. Policy Briefing Paper on Sanitation and Slopping Out in the Irish Prison System. Dublin: IPRT.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2012a. Position Paper 9: Reform of Remission, Temporary Release and Parole. Dublin: IPRT.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2012b. IPRT Information Booklet: Deaths in Prison Custody: Information for Families and Others Affected. Dublin: IPRT.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2013. IPRT Welcomes Laws Strengthening Internal Prisoner Complaints System But Need for Independent Complaints Mechanism Remains. Media Advisory, January 22. http://www.iprt.ie/contents/2468
  30. ———. 2014. Failures in Accountability Structures in Irish Prisons ‘Extremely Disturbing’—IPRT. Media Advisory, October 9. http://www.iprt.ie/contents/2671
  31. Irish Prison Service. 2015. Annual Report 2014. Longford: Irish Prison Service.Google Scholar
  32. Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice (JCFJ). 2012. The Irish Prison System: Vision, Values, Reality. Dublin: Jesuit Centre for Faith and Justice.Google Scholar
  33. Karstedt, S. 2015. Cultural Peers and Penal Policies: A Configurational Approach Toward Mapping Penal Landscapes. Punishment and Society 17 (3): 374–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lally, C. 2014. Brave New Leadership is the Key to Reform of the Department of Justice. Irish Times, July 30.Google Scholar
  35. Law Reform Commission. 2008. Report on Homicide: Murder and Involuntary Manslaughter. LRC 87–2008.Google Scholar
  36. Livingstone, S. 2000. Prisoners’ Rights in the Context of the European Convention on Human Rights. Punishment and Society 2 (3): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martynowicz, A. 2011. Oversight of Prison Conditions and Investigations of Deaths in Custody: International Human Rights Standards and the Practice in Ireland. Prison Journal 91 (1): 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCullagh, C. 2002. The Social Analysis of the Irish Prison System. In Criminal Justice in Ireland, ed. P. O’Mahony, 595–614. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  39. McCutcheon, P., and G. Coffey. 2006. Report into the Determination of Life Sentences Submitted to the Irish Human Rights Commission. http://www.ihrc.ie/download/pdf/report_determination_life_sentences.pdf
  40. McMorrow, G. 2014. Report of the Committee of Investigation into Gary Douch. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  41. Mullally, S. 2014. Speech at the Launch of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (IHREC) Designate Report on Ireland’s Fourth Periodic Review of Its Compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Jervis House, Dublin 1, June 16. http://www.ihrec.ie/download/pdf/prof_siobhan_mullally_ihrec_designate_speech_launch_of_report_on_iccpr_16_june_2014.pdf
  42. Myjer, E. 2010. About the Human Rights Success Stories of the Council of Europe. Some Reflections on the Impact of the CPT upon the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. In Fervet opus: liber amicorum Anton van Kalmthout, ed. M. Groenhuijsen, T. Kooijmans, and T. de Roos, 161–174. Antwerp: Maklu.Google Scholar
  43. Ni Faifertaigh, U. 2007. The European Convention on Human Rights and the Criminal Justice System. Judicial Studies Institute Journal 2: 18–49. http://www.jsijournal.ie/html/volumes_7_2.htm
  44. O’Donnell, I. 2008. Stagnation and Change in Irish Penal Policy. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 47 (2): 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Mahony, P. 1994. The Annual Report on Prisons and the Issue of Accountability. Irish Law Times 12 (1): 6–9.Google Scholar
  46. O’Malley, T. 2008. The Ends of Sentence: Imprisonment and Early Release Decisions in Ireland. Paper Delivered at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, June 2008, p. 12. Available at http://www.irishsentencing.ie/en/ISIS/Pages/WP09000222 (accessed various dates).
  47. Prisons Hygiene Policy Group. 1997. Report of the Prisons Hygiene Policy Group. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  48. Rogan, M. 2012. Prison Conditions under Irish Law and the European Convention on Human Rights. Dublin: Dublin Institute of Technology/Irish Penal Reform Trust.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2013. Pragmatism, Neglect and the Effects of Austerity. In Punishment in Europe: A Critical Anatomy of Penal Systems, ed. V. Ruggiero and M. Ryan, 86–110. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———. 2014a. Judicial Conception of Prisoners’ Rights in Ireland: An Emerging Field. Academy of European Law, ‘Improving Conditions Related to Detention’, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, November 6–7.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2014b. The Rule of Law and Access to Justice in Prisons. Burren Law School. http://arrow.dit.ie/aaschlawcon/5/
  52. ———. 2014c. Prison Law. Dublin: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  53. ———. 2015. The Policymaking Process and Penal Change. In Routledge Handbook of Irish Criminology, ed. D. Healy, C. Hamilton, Y. Daly, and M. Butler, 434–449. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Snacken, S., and D. van Zyl Smit. 2013. Distinctive Features of European Penology and Penal Policy-Making. In European Penology? ed. T. Daems, D. van Zyl Smit, and S. Snacken, 3–26. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  55. Strategic Review of Penal Policy. 2014. Final Report. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality. http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Strategic%20Review%20of%20Penal%20Policy.pdf/Files/Strategic%20Review%20of%20Penal%20Policy.pdf
  56. Thornton Hall Project Review Group. 2011. Report of the Thornton Hall Project Review Group. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality.Google Scholar
  57. Tighe, M. 2015. State Pays Out to Prisoners with Slop-Out Cases. Sunday Times, May 17. http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/News/article1557353.ece
  58. Toland, K. 2014. Report of the Independent Review Group on the Department and Equality. Dublin: Department of Justice and Equality. http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Independent%20Review%20Accessible.pdf/Files/Independent%20Review%20Accessible.pdf
  59. UN Human Rights Committee. 2008. Concluding Observations in Respect of the Third Periodic Report Submitted by Ireland under Article 40 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. CCPR/C/IRL/CO/, July 3.Google Scholar
  60. Van Zyl Smit, D., and S. Snacken. 2009. Principles of European Prison Law and Policy. Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Vaughan, B., and S. Kilcommins. 2007. The Europeanisation of Human Rights and the Limits of Authoritarian Policing in Ireland. European Journal of Criminology 4 (4): 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. ———. 2008. Terrorism, Rights and the Rule of Law: Negotiating Justice in Ireland. Cullompton, Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 2010. The Governance of Crime and Negotiation of Justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice 10 (1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Maynooth UniversityMaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations