Skip to main content

Discovering Toxic Policies Using MBSE Constructs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research

Abstract

Policy development and implementation is considered an institution-centric endeavor. Most policies are documents that dictate institutional processes, organizational structure, and compliance standards. These policies are often developed by governing entities in isolation from the field. There is no standard method for evaluating a policy document and often toxic policies are realized during implementation, causing significant damage to the reputation of the organization. In this paper, we examine four Veterans Affairs (VA) polices using MBSE constructs of structural–behavioral integrity and consistency to investigate the toxic nature of policies. We also develop a framework to model policy, identify policy gaps, and calculate policy toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Williamson RB. (2011). VA Health Care : weaknesses in policies and oversight governing medical supplies and equipment pose risks to veterans’ safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, May

    Google Scholar 

  2. Draper, D. A. (2015). VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH CARE: addition to GAO’s high risk list and actions needed for removal. United States Government Accountability Office.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Department of Defense. (n.d.). DoD issuance standards. Retrieved from DoD Issuances The Official Department of Defense Website for DoD Issuances: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/writing/DoD_Issuances_Standards.pdf

  4. Richardson S (n.d.) In using systems engineering tools to rethink U.S. Policy on North Korea. In: Perspectives on U.S. policy toward North Korea: stalemate or checkmate? Lexington Books, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harvey, D., Waite, M., Logan, P., & Liddy, T. (n.d.). “Document the model, Don’t Model the Document SETE APCOSE 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gobet F, Clarkson G (2004) Chunks in expert memory: evidence for the magical number four ... Or is it two? Memory 12(6):732–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller G (1995) The magical number seven, plus or minus two some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 101(2):343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salnitri, M. (2014). Modeling and verifying security policies in business processes. In Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (pp. 200–214). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shamsnaz, V., & Rust, T. (2016). Using model based systems engineering in policy development: a thought paper. Conference on Systems Engineering Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank our colleagues from VERC New England Office who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research, especially Dr. Tom Rust and Andrew Holbrook.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Krishnan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Krishnan, R., Virani, S., Gasoto, R. (2018). Discovering Toxic Policies Using MBSE Constructs. In: Madni, A., Boehm, B., Ghanem, R., Erwin, D., Wheaton, M. (eds) Disciplinary Convergence in Systems Engineering Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62217-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62216-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62217-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics