Abstract
National and global mangrove monitoring efforts provide an invaluable picture of changes to these dynamic and valuable ecosystems, the global threats they face, and the outcomes of recovery efforts. However, multiple forces drive global mangrove losses, whose nature and dynamics can vary dramatically across regional and local contexts. If we are to truly understand the human dimensions of these systems, we need to understand the fundamental drivers of mangrove losses and how they interact at local levels. The fate of interdisciplinary mangrove science as well as current and future mangrove conservation efforts rests on this knowledge. In this chapter, we review case studies of mangrove ecosystems to compare the fundamental drivers of regional mangrove losses. We highlight two significant drivers of mangrove losses: (a) mangrove-dependent subsistence economies and related poverty traps; and (b) the global trade in shrimp. Drawing on the cases of Southeast Asia/China and Ecuador, two distinct geographic regions that experienced rapid mangrove losses in the recent few decades, we examine specific drivers in those regional contexts. We conclude with implications of our findings for mangrove vulnerability and prospects for resilience. We argue for the benefits of a coupled system (specifically, a coupled socio-ecological system) approach to understand the bi-directional linkages between mangrove ecological dynamics on the one hand, and the constellation of anthropogenic drivers of mangrove change, on the other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
(Author’s translation). The original text of the Forestry Law Titulo 1, Capitulo 1, Art. 1 published in Registro Oficial No. 418 (September 10, 2004) states: “Los manglares, aun aquellos existentes en propiedades particulares, se consideran bienes de Estado y están fuera del comercio, no son susceptibles de posesión o cualquier otro medio de apropiación y solamente podrán ser explotados mediante concesión otorgada, de conformidad con esta Ley y su reglamento.”
References
Aksornkoae S, Sugunnasil W, Sathirathai S (2004) Analytical background of the case studies and research sites: Ecological, historical and social perspectives. In: Barbier EB, Sathirathai S (eds) Shrimp farming and mangrove loss in Thailand. Edward Elgar, London, pp 73–95
Badola R, Hussain SA (2005) Valuing ecosystem functions: An empirical study on the storm protection function of Bhitarkanika mangrove ecosystem, India. Environmental Conservation 32(1), 85–92.
Bann C (1998) The Economic Value of Mangroves: A Manual for Researchers. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Singapore
Bann C (1999) A contingent valuation of the mangroves of Benut, Johor State. Johor State Forestry Department. http://www.soc.uoc.gr/calendar/2000EAERE/papers/PDF/A6-Bann.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2016
Barbier EB (2006) Natural barriers to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front Ecol Environ 4:124–131
Barbier EB (2007a) Natural capital and labor allocation mangrove-dependent households in Thailand. The Journal of Environment & Development 16:398–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496507307458
Barbier EB (2007b) Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs. Econ Policy 22:177–229
Barbier EB (2010) Poverty, development, and environment. Environ Dev Econ 15(Special Issue 06):635–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X1000032X
Barrett CB, Travis AJ, Dasgupta P (2011) On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(34):13907–13912
Binh TNKD, Vromant N, Nguyen TH, Hens L, Boon EK (2005) Land cover changes between 1968 and 2003 in Cai Nuoc, Ca Mau Peninsula, Vietnam. Environ Dev Sustain 7:519–536
Boyd CE, Clay JW (1998) Shrimp aquaculture and the environment. Sci Am 278(6):58–65
Bravo M (2007) Análisis de los acuerdos de uso sustentable otorgados a usuarios tradicionales para la protección y manejo del ecosistema manglar: Estudios de caso de las Concheras 18 de Octubre (Provincia Esmeraldas), Cangrejeros Seis de Julio (Provincia Guayas) y Mariscadores Costa Rica (Provincia el Oro). In: Programa de manejo de recursos costeros, Procedimiento CCI No. PMRC-035-2005, Actualización de los planes de manejo de las concesiones del manglar. Guayaquil, pp 1–50
Bravo M (2010) Interpretación del estudio multitemporal (clirsen 1969–2006) de las coberturas de manglar, camaroneras y áreas salinas en la franja costera del Ecuador Continental. Master’s Thesis, University of Guayaquil
Briggs M (2006a) Cultured aquatic species information programme, Penaeus vannamei. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Litopenaeus_vannamei/en. Accessed 29 Sept 2013
Briggs M (2006b) National aquaculture sector overview, Ecuador. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. www.fao.org/fishery/countrysector/naso_ecuador/en. Accessed 29 Sept 2013
Chen L, Wang W, Zhang Y, Lin G (2009) Recent progresses in mangrove conservation, restoration and research in China. J Plant Ecol 2:45–54
Chen B, Song Y, Zan Q, Tam NFY, Li Y, Yue Y, Tian L, Yu S (2012) Dynamics of the main landscape types at Shenzhen Bay during past three decades. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 51:86–92
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Mathenge C, Kairo JG, Koedam N (2000) Utilization of mangrove wood products around Mida Creek (Kenya) amongst subsistence and commercial users. Econ Bot 54:513–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866549
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Zetterström T, Rönnbäck P, Troell M, Wickramasinghe A, Koedam N (2002) Recent changes in land-use in the Pambala-Chilaw Lagoon Complex (Sri Lanka) investigated using remote sensing and GIS: Conservation of mangroves versus development of shrimp farming. Environ Dev Sustain 4:185–200
Dahdouh-Guebas F, Jayatissa LP, Di Nitto D, Bosire JO, Lo Seen D, Koedam N (2005) How effective were mangroves as a defence against the recent tsunami? Curr Biol 15:R443–R447
Danielsen F, Sørensen MK, Olwig MF, Selvam V, Parish F, Burgess ND, Hiraishi T, Karunagaran VM, Rasmussen MS, Hansen LB (2005) The Asian tsunami: A protective role for coastal vegetation. Science 310:643
Das S, Crépin AS (2013) Mangroves can provide protection against wind damage during storms. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 134(December):98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.09.021
Dewalt BR, Vergne P, Hardin M (1996) Shrimp aquaculture development and the environment: People, mangroves and fisheries on the Gulf of Fonseca, Honduras. World Dev 26:1193–1208
Ecuadorian National Aquaculture Chamber (2016) Shrimp production report 2016 (online). Consulted on March 13, 2017. Available at http://www.cnaecuador.com/images/comercio_exterior/estadisticas_camaron/2016
Ewel K, Twilley R, Ong J (1998) Different kinds of mangrove forests provide different goods and services. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 7:83–94
Feka NZ, Chuyong GB, Ajonina GN (2009) Sustainable utilization of mangroves using improved fish-smoking systems: A management perspective from the Douala-Edea wildlife reserve, Cameroon. Tropical Conservation Science 2:450–468
FAO (2016) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome, pp 200
Food and Drug Administration (2013) 2013 FDA Seafood List. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/SEARCH_SEAFOOD/index.cfm?other=complete. Accessed 29 Sept 2013
France-Lanord C, Derry LA (1997) Organic carbon burial forcing of the carbon cycle from Himalyan erosion. Nature 390:65–67
Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 552:143–150
Giri C, Ochieng E, Tieszen LL, Zhu Z, Singh A, Loveland T, Masek J, Duke N (2011) Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:154–159
Gordon C, Tweneboah E, Mensah AM, Ayivor JS (2009) The application of the ecosystem approach to mangrove management: lessons for Ghana. Nature & Faune 24:30–41
Hamilton SE (2011) The impact of shrimp farming on mangrove ecosystems and local livelihoods along the Pacific Coast of Ecuador. Dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi
Hamilton SE (2012) The Commodification of Ecuador’s Estuary Environments from 1970–2006. Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, San Francisco, California
Hamilton SE, Collins S (2013) Livelihood responses to mangrove deforestation in the Northern provinces of Ecuador. Bosque 34(2):143–153
He Q, Bertness MD, Bruno JF, Li B, Chen G, Coverdale TC, Altieri AH, Bai J, Sun T, Pennings SC, Liu J, Ehrlich PR, Cui B (2014) Economic development and coastal ecosystem change in China. Sci Rep 4:5995
Hussain SA, Badola R (2008) Valuing mangrove ecosystem services: Linking nutrient retention function of mangrove forests to enhanced agroecosystem production. Wetl Ecol Manag 16:441–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9080-z
Hussain SA, Badola R (2010) Valuing mangrove benefits: Contribution of mangrove forests to local livelihoods in Bhitarkanika Conservation Area, East Coast of India. Wetl Ecol Manag 18:321–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9173-3
Islam MS, Ikejima K (2009) Gear type, species composition and economic value of fisheries in the mangroves of Pak Phanang, Thailand. Wetl Ecol Manag 18:27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-009-9145-7
Kathiresan K (2012) Importance of mangrove ecosystem. International Journal of Marine Science 2:70–89. https://doi.org/10.5376/ijms.2012.02.0010
Kathiresan K, Rajendran N (2005) Coastal mangrove forests mitigated tsunami. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 65:601–606
Kerr AM, Baird AH (2007) Natural barriers to natural disasters. Bioscience 57:102–103
Kling CL, Phaneuf DJ, Zhao J (2012) From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? J Econ Perspect 26:3–26
Kuenzer C, Tuan VQ (2013) Assessing the ecosystem services value of Can Gio Mangrove biosphere reserve: combining earth-observation- and household-survey-based analyses. Appl Geogr 45:167–184
Lai S, Loke LHL, Hilton MJ, Bouma TJ, Todd PA (2015) The effects of urbanisation on coastal habitats and the potential for ecological engineering: A Singapore case study. Ocean Coast Manag 103:78–85
Liao B-W, Zhang Q-M (2014) Area, distribution and species composition of mangroves in China. Wetland Science 12:435–440. (in Chinese with English Abstract)
Lightner DV (2011) Virus diseases of farmed shrimp in the Western Hemisphere (the Americas): A review. J Invertebr Pathol 106:110–130
McNally CG, Uchida E, Gold AJ (2011) The effect of a protected area on the tradeoffs between short-run and long-run benefits from mangrove ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(34):13945–13950
Meyfroidt P (2015) Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science. J Land Use Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2015.1117530
Mialhe F, Gunnell Y, Mering C (2013) The impacts of shrimp farming on land use, employment and migration in Tumbes, northern Peru. Ocean Coast Manag 73:1–12
Peng Y, Zheng M, Zheng Z, Wu G, Chen Y, Xu H, Tian G, Peng S, Chen G, Lee SY (2016) Virtual increase or latent loss? A reassessment of mangrove populations and their conservation in Guangdong, southern China. Mar Pollut Bull 109(2):691–699
Primavera J (2006) Overcoming the impacts of aquaculture on the coastal zone. Ocean Coast Manag 49(9):531–545
Richards DR, Friess DA (2016) Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:344–349
Rönnbäck P (1999) The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecol Econ 29:235–252
Rosero Moya K, Santillan Salas C (2011) Ministerio del ambiente entrega acuerdo de uso sustentable y custodia de manglar. Boletin No. 498 09-06-2011. http://www.ambiente.gob.ec/?q=node/1952. Accessed: 8/14/2011
Thompson M (2014) White shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) on coastal ponds of Ecuador. Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch, Monterey
Thu PM, Populus J (2007) Status and changes of mangrove forest in Mekong Delta: Case study in Tra Vinh, Vietnam. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 71:98–109
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2005) After the tsunami: rapid environmental assessment report, February 22, 2005. United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) Economic analysis of mangrove forests: a case study in Gazi Bay, Kenya. UNEP, New York
Valiela I, Bowen JL, York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: One of the world’s threatened major tropical environments. Bioscience 51:807–815
Vermaat JE, Thampanya U (2006) Mangroves mitigate tsunami damage: A further response. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 69:1–3
Vosti S, Reardon T (1997) Sustainability, growth and poverty alleviation: A policy and agroecological perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Walters BB (2003) People and mangroves in the Philippines: Fifty years of coastal environmental change. Environ Conserv 30:293–303
Wang W, Wang M (2007) The mangroves of China. Science Press, Beijing
World Bank (2008) Poverty and the environment: understanding linkages at the household level. World Bank, Washington DC
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments on this manuscript. Uchida acknowledges that this material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number #1518471.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chowdhury, R.R., Uchida, E., Chen, L., Osorio, V., Yoder, L. (2017). Anthropogenic Drivers of Mangrove Loss: Geographic Patterns and Implications for Livelihoods. In: Rivera-Monroy, V., Lee, S., Kristensen, E., Twilley, R. (eds) Mangrove Ecosystems: A Global Biogeographic Perspective. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62206-4_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62206-4_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62204-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62206-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)