Advertisement

Communication as Paramount: Schutz’s Developing Understanding of Multiple Realities

  • Michael Barber
Chapter
  • 139 Downloads
Part of the Contributions To Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 91)

Abstract

Schutz’s earlier writings (meaning up until 1945) tend to convey an opposition between the non-pragmatic finite provinces of meaning and pragmatic everyday life, as can be shown by considering the modifications literature and scientific theory introduce into one’s everyday relevances, typifications, and relationships. But as his writings on multiple realities developed, Schutz recognized more and more the importance of communication, based on working acts, until communication rather than working became for him the paramount reality. Such communication provides a less antagonistic counterpart to non-pragmatic finite provinces of meaning, which must often make use of it, and the cooperative, social nature of communication de-emphasizes the motivation of pragmatic mastery, thereby opening the door to a more cooperative relationship between the pragmatic and non-pragmatic finite provinces of meaning. Schutz, however, never retracted his idea that the non-pragmatic provinces could bring emancipation to the pragmatic world of everyday life.

References

  1. Barber, Michael. 1988. Social typifications and the elusive other: The place of sociology of knowledge in Alfred Schutz’s phenomenology. Lewisberg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2015. Resistance to pragmatic tendencies in the world of working in the religious finite province of meaning. Human Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10746-015-9356-2.
  3. Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Reason and the rationalization of society. Vol. 1 of The theory of communicative action. Trans. T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, Edmund. 1960. Cartesian meditations: An introduction to phenomenology. Trans. D. Cairns. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 1970. The Vienna lecture. In The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology, trans. D. Carr, Appendix 1, 269–299. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. Grenzprobleme der Phänomenologie: Analysen des Unbewusstseins and der Instinkte, Metaphysik, Späte Ethik: Texte aus dem Nachlass (1908–1937), ed. R. Sowa and T. Vongehr. Vol. 42 of Husserliana. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Schutz, Alfred. 1962a. On multiple realities. In The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson, 207–259. Vol. 1 of Collected papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1962b. Sartre’s theory of the alter ego. In The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson, 180–203. Vol. 1 of Collected papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1962c. Symbol, reality, and society. In The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson, 287–356. Vol. 1 of Collected papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1967. The phenomenology of the social world. Trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1996. Realities from daily life to theoretical contemplation. In Collected papers, vol. 4, ed. H. Wagner, G. Psathas, and F. Kersten, 25–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2013a. The problem of personality in the social world. In Literary reality and relationships, ed. M. Barber, 199–309. Vol. 6 of Collected papers. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2013b. Two Goethe texts. In Literature and literary reality, ed. M. Barber, 311–405. Vol. 6 of Collected Papers. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Barber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySaint Louis UniversitySaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations