Abstract
We depend on “nature” for air, water, food, shelter, energy and materials. There are two schools of thought about how to manage nature. One says that if we want to manage nature, we have to price it so we can take account of that when making decisions on how much damage a particular human activity may cause. The other says that something so instinctive to our collective well-being cannot be managed by a price. When the two words “capital” and “nature” are linked, there is a failure to assign parity between the two. Environmental and social impact assessments should be a warning, whereby developments have been approved in the face of clear residual environmental and social impact, because the economic case was overwhelming.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pagett, R. (2018). Biodiversity Loss. In: Building Global Resilience in the Aftermath of Sustainable Development. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Policy and Regulation . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62151-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62151-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62150-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62151-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)