Feminist Posthumanities: An Introduction

  • Cecilia Åsberg
  • Rosi Braidotti

Human nature is not the oxymoron we imagined it to be. In this new planetary age of the Anthropocene, defined by human-induced climatic, biological, and even geological transformations, we humans are fully in nature. And nature is fully in us. This was, of course, always the case, but it is more conspicuously so now than ever before: people are entangled in co-constitutive relationships with nature and the environment, with other animals and organisms, with medicine and technology, with science and epistemic politics. We live and die, play, thrive, and suffer by each other. Now is the time for greater scholarly attentiveness to such human and more-than-human worlds in sociocultural research, saturated as they are with ethical and political implications (van Dooren et al. 2016). For example, think of “mad cow” disease, where humans feeding cows with by-products from slaughtered sheep infected with the prionic disorder “scrapie” in turn generates prion disorders in cows that get...


  1. Adams, Carol J. 1990. The sexual politics of meat: A feminist-vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Sarah. 2004. Cultural politics of emotion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alaimo, Stacy. 2008. Trans-corporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In Material Feminisms, eds. Alaimo Stacy, Susan Hekman, 237–264. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily natures: Science, environment, and the material self. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alaimo, Stacy. 2011. New materialisms, old humanisms, or, following the submersible. In NORA: NordicJournal of Feminist and Gender Research 19(4): 280–284.Google Scholar
  6. Alaimo, Stacy. 2014. Thinking as the stuff of the world. O-zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies 1:14.Google Scholar
  7. Alaimo, Stacy and Susan Hekman. 2008. Material feminisms. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Åsberg, Cecilia. 2005. Genetiska föreställningar: Mellan genus och gener I populär/vetenskapens visuella kulturer. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Åsberg, Cecilia. 2008. A feminist companion to the posthumanities: Donna Haraway’s When Species Meet. In NORA: NordicJournal of Feminist and Gender Research 16(4):241–203.Google Scholar
  10. Åsberg, Cecilia. 2009. Contact zones are not necessarily comfort zones: Posthumanities in the gender lab. In Gender delight: Science knowledge, culture and writing … for Nina Lykke, eds. Cecilia Åsberg, Katherine Harrison, Björn Pernrud, and Malena Gustavson, 229–245. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Åsberg, Cecilia (2018) “Feminist Posthumanities in the Anthropocene: Forays into the Postnatural”, Journal of Posthuman Studies: Philosophy, Technology, Media, vol 1:2,185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Åsberg, Cecilia and Tara Mehrabi. 2016. Nature in the lab. In Gender: Nature, ed. Iris van der Tuin. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Åsberg, Cecilia, Redi Koobak, and Ericka Johnson. 2011. Beyond the Humanist imagination. NORA: NordicJournal of Feminist and Gender Research 19(4):218–230.Google Scholar
  14. Åsberg, Cecilia, Kathrin Thiele, and Iris van der Tuin. 2015. Speculative before the turn: Re-introducing feminist materialist performativity. Cultural Studies Review 21(2):145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Badmington, Neil. 2000. Posthumanism. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Balsamo, Anne. 1996. Technologies of the gendered body: Reading cyborg women. London and Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3):801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bennet, Jane. 2010. Vibrant matter. A political ecology of things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bhaba, Homi. 1997. The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Braidotti, Rosi. 1994. Nomadic subjects. Embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Braidotti, Rosi. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a feminist theory of becoming. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Braidotti, Rosi. 2005. A critical cartography of feminist post-postmodernism. Australian Feminist Studies 20(47):169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Braidotti, Rosi. 2006. Transpositions. On nomadic ethics. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The posthuman. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  26. Braidotti, Rosi. 2016. Posthuman critical theory. In Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures, Eds. Banerji, Debashish, Paranjape, Makarand R., Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Braidotti, Rosi. 2017. Generative Futures: On Affirmative Ethics. Critical and Clinical Cartographies: Architecture, Robotics, Medicine, Philosophy 288.Google Scholar
  28. Braidotti, Rosi and Paul Gilroy. 2016. Conflicting humanities. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  29. Bryld, Mette and Nina Lykke. 2000. Cosmodolphins: A feminist cultural studies of technology, animals and the sacred. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  30. Bull, Jacob, Tora Holmberg, and Cecilia Åsberg. 2018. Animal Places. Lively Cartographies of Human Animal Relations. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  31. Cielemęcka, Olga. 2015. All things spectral. Somatechnics 5(2):234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. 2010. New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foucault, Michel. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Trans. Colin Gordon et al. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  36. Franklin, Sarah, Celia Lury, and Jackie Stacey. 2000. Global nature, global culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Gaard, Greta. 1993. Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gatens, Moira, and Genevieve Lloyd. 1999. Collective imaginings: Spinoza, past and present. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Cathy N. Davidson, David Theo Goldberg. (2004) Engaging the Humanities. Profession 2004 (1):42–62.Google Scholar
  40. Gibson-Graham, Julie Katherine. 1996. “The” end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy; with a new introduction. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  41. Górska, Magdalena. 2016. Breathing matters: Feminist intersectional politics of vulnerability. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Grosz, Elizabeth. 2011. Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gunaratnam, Yasmin, and Nigel Clark. 2012. Pre-race post-race: Climate change and planetary humanism. Darkmatter. Accessed 1 May 2015.
  45. Halberstam, Judith M., and Ira Livingston. 1995. Posthuman bodies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Haraway, Donna J. 1988. Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3):575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Haraway, Donna J. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Haraway, Donna J. 1994. A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 2(1):59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  50. Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  51. Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1995. Searching for common ground. In Reinventing nature? responses to postmodern deconstruction, eds. Soulé Michel, and Gary Lease. San Francisco, CA: Island Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1997. The posthuman body: Inscription and incorporation in Galatea 2.2 and Snow Crash. Configurations 2:241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Heise, Ursula K. 2016. Imagining extinction. The cultural meanings of endangered species. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Hellstrand, Ingvil Førland. 2017. From metaphor to metamorph? on science fiction and the ethics of transformative encounters. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 25(2): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hemmings, Claire. 2011. Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Henriksen, Line, and Marietta Radomska. 2015. Missing links and non-human queerings: An introduction. Somatechnics 5(2):113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hird, Myra J. 2009. The origins of sociable life: Evolution after science studies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hird, Myra J. and Celia Roberts. 2011. Nonhuman feminisms. Feminist Theory 12.2.Google Scholar
  61. Holmberg, Tora. 2005. Vetenskap på gränsen. PhD dissertation. Lund: Arkiv förlag.Google Scholar
  62. Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann. 2014. Material ecocriticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kelley, Colin P., Shahrzad Mohtadi, A. Mark Cane, Richard Seager, and Yochanan Kushnir. 2015. Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(11):3241–3246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kember, Sarah. 2003. Cyberfeminism and artificial life. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kirby, Vicki. 2008. Natural convers(at)ions: Or, what if culture was really nature all along? In Material Feminisms, eds. Stacy Alaimo, and Susan Hekman, 214–236. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Kirby, Vicki. 2011. Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kirksey, Eben. 2015. Emergent ecologies. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Koivunen, Anu. 2010. An affective turn?: Reimagining the subject of feminist theory? In Working with affect in feminist readings: Disturbing differences, eds. Marianne Liljeström, Susanna Paasonen, 8–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We have never been modern. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lingis, Alphonso. 1993. Bestiality. Symploke 6(1): 56–71. 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The man of reason: “Man” and “woman” in western philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lykke, Nina. 2010. Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Lykke, Nina. 2015. Queer Widowhood. Lambda Nordica 4:85–111.Google Scholar
  74. MacCormack, Patricia. 2012. Posthuman ethics: Embodiment and cultural theory. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  75. MacKenzie, Adrian. 2002. Transductions: Bodies and machines at speed. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  76. Mehrabi, Tara. 2016. Making death matter: A feminist technoscience study of Alzheimer’s sciences in the laboratory. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Merchant, Carolyn. 1980. The Death of Nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution, Harper: San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  78. Moraga, Cherrie and Gloria Anzaldua, eds. 1981. This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Persephone.Google Scholar
  79. Mortimer-Sandilands, Catriona, and Bruce Erickson. 2010. Queer ecologies: Sex, nature, politics, desire. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Morton, Timothy. 2016. Dark ecology: For a logic of future coexistence. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Neimanis, Astrida. 2017. Bodies of water: Posthuman feminist phenomenology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  82. Neimanis, Astrida, Cecilia Åsberg, and Johan Hedrén. 2015. Four problems, four directions for environmental humanities: Toward critical posthumanities for the anthropocene. Ethics & the Environment 20(1):67–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Nixon, Rob. 2011. Slow violence: Environmentalism of the poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Plumwood, Val. 2007. A Review of Deborah Bird Rose’s ‘Reports from a wild country’. Australian Humanities Review 42: 1–3.Google Scholar
  86. Plumwood, Val. 2012. The Eye of the Crocodile. Canberra: ANU Press.Google Scholar
  87. Potter, Emily, and Gay Hawkins. 2009. Naturecultures introduction. Australian Humanities Review 46.Google Scholar
  88. Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2017. In Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Radomska, Marietta. 2016. Uncontainable life: A biophilosophy of bioart. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Rich, Adrienne. 1984. Notes toward a politics of location. In Feminist postcolonial theory: A reader, eds. Reina Lewis, Sara Mills, 29–42. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Roberts, Celia. 2007. Messengers of sex: hormones, biomedicine and feminism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Rose, Nikolas. 2001. The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society 18(6):1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rose, Deborah Bird. 2015. The ecological humanities. In Manifesto for living in the anthropocene, eds. Katherine Gibson, Deborah, Bird Rose, and Ruth Fincher, 1–6. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.Google Scholar
  94. Rose, Deborah Bird, Thom van Dooren, Matthew Chrulew, Stuart Cooke, Matthew Kearnes and Emily O’Gorman. 2012. Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities 1:1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scott, Joan W. 1996. Only paradoxes to offer: French feminists and the rights of man. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Shiva, Vandana. 1988. Staying alive. Women, ecology and development. New York: South End Press.Google Scholar
  97. Shiva, Vandana. 1997. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  98. Sjögren, Hanna. 2016. Sustainability for whom? The politics of imagining environmental change in education. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Squier, Susan Merrill. 2004. Liminal lives. Imagining the human at the frontiers of biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Środa, Magdalena, Monika Rogowska-Stangret and Olga Cielemęcka. 2014. A quest for feminist space and time. Women – A Cultural Review 25(1):114–122.Google Scholar
  101. Strathern, Marilyn. 1992. Reproducing the future. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Thornham, Sue. 2001. Feminist theory and cultural studies: Histories of unsettled relations. London: Bloomington.Google Scholar
  103. Tlostanova, Madina. 2017. Transcending the human/non-human divide. Angelaki 22(2):25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Treusch, Pat. 2015. Robotic companionship: The making of anthropomatic kitchen robots in queer feminist technoscience perspective. PhD dissertation. Linköping: Linköping University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Tsing, Anna. 2012. Unruly edges: Mushrooms as companion species. Environmental Humanities 1:141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tuana, Nancy Ed. 1989. Feminism and science. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Tuana, Nancy. 2008. Viscous porosity: Witnessing katrina. In Material Feminisms, eds. Stacy Alaimo, Susan Hekman, 188–213. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Van Dooren, Thom, Eben Kirksey and Ursula Münster. 2016. Multispecies studies. Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities 8(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. van der Tuin, Iris and Rick Dolphijn. 2010. The transversality of new materialism. Women: a cultural review 21.2:153–171.Google Scholar
  110. van der Tuin, Iris. 2011a. The new materialist ‘always already’: On an a-human humanities. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 19(4): 285–290.Google Scholar
  111. van der Tuin, Iris. 2011b. “A different starting point, a different metaphysics”: Reading Bergson and Barad diffractively. Hypatia 26(1):22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. van der Tuin, Iris. 2015. Generational feminisms: New materialist introduction to a generative approach. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  113. Weil, Kari. 2010. A report on the animal turn. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 21(2):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid geographies. Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  115. Wilson, Elizabeth. 2004. Psychosomatic: Feminism and the neurological body. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Animal rites. American culture, the discourse of species and posthumanist theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  117. Wolfe, Cary. 2010. What is posthumanism? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  118. Yusoff, Kathryn, and Jennifer Gabrys. 2011. Climate change and the imagination. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(4):516–534.Google Scholar
  119. Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2017. Recognition, Intersectionality and Transversal Politics. Recognition as Key for Reconciliation: Israel, Palestine, and Beyond 157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations