Abstract
Advances in primatology show that there is little uniquely human about humanity. Language and culture were long considered the likeliest bearers of the imago Dei, but it has convincingly been proven that neither theory of mind, language nor the ability to use tools is reserved to humans only. Even the sacred is no longer a distinctly human domain. There is a discourse evolving around signs of transcendence in human behavior (e.g. phenomena such as play, the ever-present yearning for ‘something more’, love, etc.). All of these are also present in other species. Dogs play, birds form long-standing bonds, and so on. So if there is something uniquely human about our sense of the beyond, it must not reside in simply having that sense per se. It must be with what we do with that sense. Departing from the concepts of actual and potential and using theological metaphors as an example, I will argue that our uniqueness – if it is, indeed, there – may lie in how we relate to our sense of the beyond.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 779–818.
Foerst, A. (1998). Cog, a Humanoid Robot, and the Question of the Image of God’. Zygon, 33(1), 91–111.
Geraci, R. M. (2007). Robots and the sacred in science and science fiction: Theological implications of artificial intelligence. Zygon, 42(4), 961–980.
Goodall, J. (2005). Primate spirituality. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Encyclopedia of religion and nature (pp. 1303–1306). Continuum: London/New York.
Karo, R. (2014). God and romance: Love in religion and interpersonal relationships. Antonianum, LXXXIX, 359–378.
Porges, S. W. (1998). Love: An emergent property of the mammalian autonomic nervous system. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 837–861.
Puckett, J. (2012). The apologetics of joy: A case for the existence of god from C. S. Lewis’s argument from desire. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Fields, W. M., Segerdahl, P., & Rumbaugh, D. (2005). Culture prefigures cognition in Pan/Homo Bonobos. Theoria, 54, 311–328.
Schäfer, L. (2008). Nonempirical reality: Transcending the physical and spiritual in the order of the one. Zygon, 43(2), 329–352.
Tomberg, J. (2011). Kirjanduse lepitav otstarve. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karo, R. (2017). Special? Oh, Please! And Yet …. In: Fuller, M., Evers, D., Runehov, A., Sæther, KW. (eds) Issues in Science and Theology: Are We Special?. Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62124-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62124-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62123-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62124-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)