Latina Mobilization: A Strategy for Increasing the Political Participation of Latino Families

  • Christina E. Bejarano
  • Valerie Martinez-Ebers


The Second-Wave feminists attempted to create a clear path for female political leaders. Caucasian women clearly benefited most substantially from the movement, and African American women have made some progress, particularly at the state level. In this chapter, Christina E. Bejarano and Valerie Martinez-Ebers expose the perceived disparate impact among the Latina community in which visible female political leaders are extremely rare, and the vast majority of Latinos are unable to name even a single important Latina political leader. Bejarano and Martinez-Ebers contend that Second-Wave Feminism did, in fact, impact Latinas, but the efforts of Latinas in the movement have not been well documented or publicized by scholars or the media. Rather, their successes have been overshadowed by their male counterparts. Bejarano and Martinez-Ebers demonstrate how Latinas’ increased community participation provides them with stronger civic skills and stronger ties to their community/institutions, which, in turn, can also be linked to their higher political participation levels and high success rates as political candidates. In an effort to see the broad legacy of Second-Wave Feminism, Bejarano and Martinez-Ebers claim that it is critical to recover this history of Latina activism and to focus on Latinas as catalysts of political change, since women are perceived to be the key to mobilizing Latino families and communities.


  1. Anzia, Sarah F., and Christopher R. Berry. 2011. The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect: Why Do Congresswomen Outperform Congressmen? American Journal of Political Science 55: 478–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrera, Elma. 1971. Statement of Alma Barrera. Retrieved from
  3. Bedolla, Lisa Garcia, 2005. Fluid Borders: Latino Power, Identity, and Politics in Los Angeles. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bejarano, Christina E. 2013. The Latina Advantage: Gender, Race, and Political Success. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bejarano, Christina E. 2014. The Latino Gender Gap in U.S. Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Binder, Norman, J.L. Polinard, and Robert Wrinkle. 1997. Mexican American and Anglo Attitudes Toward Immigration Reform: A View from the Border. Social Science Quarterly 78: 324–337.Google Scholar
  7. Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2014. Women of Color in Elective Office, 2014. Fact Sheet. New Brunswick, NJ: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  8. Chicana Feminism—History. n.d. Retrieved from
  9. CNN. National Exit Poll, 2012 President Election. 2012. Collected by Edison Research. Accessed 10 Dec 2012.
  10. Conway, M. Margaret. 2008. The Gender Gap: A Comparison across Racial and Ethnic Groups. In Voting the Gender Gap, ed. Lois Duke Whitaker, 170–183. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Flores, Lori. 2014, March 31. The Neglected Heroines of Cesar Chavez. Colorlines: News for Action. Retrieved from
  12. Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. Entering the Arena?: Gender and the Decision to Run for Office. American Journal of Political Science 48: 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraga, Luis, and Sharon Navarro. 2004. Latinas in Latino politics. Prepared for delivery at the conference “Latino Politics: The State of the discipline,” Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, April 30–May 1, 2003.Google Scholar
  14. Fraga, Luis, Linda Lopez, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, and Ricardo Ramirez. 2006. Gender and Ethnicity: Patterns of Electoral Success and Legislative Advocacy among Latina and Latino State Officials in Four States. Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 28: 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fulton, Sarah. 2011. Running Backwards and in High Heels: The Gendered Quality Gap and Incumbent Electoral Success. Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia-Bedolla, Lisa, Katherine Tate, and Janelle Wong. 2005. Indelible Effects: The Impact of Women of Color in the U.S. Congress. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox, 152–175, 205. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Garcia, F. Chris, and Gabriel R. Sanchez. 2008. Hispanics and the U.S. Political System. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Garcia, Sonya, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, Irasema Coronado, Patricia Jaramillo, and Sharon Navarro. 2008. Politicas: Latina Trailblazers in the Texas Political Arena. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  19. García-Bedolla, Lisa, Jessica Lavariega Monforti, and Adrian Pantoja. 2007. A Second Look: Is There a Latina/o Gender Gap? Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28: 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorman, Peter. 2014. Latina Dreamer: Dolores Huerta’s Life Proves That Yes, You Can. Fort Worth Weekly, May 14. Retrieved from
  21. Guide to Commission Femenil Mexicana Nacional Archives, 1967–1997. 2003. Retrieved from
  22. Gutierrez, Jose Angel, Michelle Melendez, and Sonia Noyola. 2007. Chicanas in Charge: Texas Women in the Public Arena. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hardy-Fanta, Carol. 1993. Latina Politics, Latino Politics: Gender, Culture, and Political Participation In Boston. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 1994. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. impre-media/LatinoDecisions. 2012. Election Eve Poll [dataset]. November 6,
  26. Jackson, Mareshah. 2013. Center for American Progress. Fact sheet: The state of Latinas in the United States. Accessed Mar 2014.
  27. Jones-Correa, Michael. 1998a. Between Two Nations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jones-Correa, Michael. 1998b. Different Paths: Gender, Immigration and Political Participation. International Migration Review 32: 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latinas Represent. 2014. Retrieved from
  30. Lopez, Nancy. 2003. Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys: Race and Gender Disparity in Urban Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Lopez, Mark Hugo. 2013. Three-Fourths of Hispanics Say Their Community Needs a Leader. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center, October 22. Retrieved from
  32. Marino, Katherine. 2012. Liberating the Chicana Feminist Archive. Gender News, June 6. Retrieved from
  33. Montoya, Lisa J. 1996. Latino Gender Difference in Public Opinion: Results from the Latino National Political Survey. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 18 (May): 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pardo, Mary. 1998. Mexican American Women Activists, Identity and Resistance in two Los Angeles Communities. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rodriquez, Roberto. 2014. Cesar Chavez: Conditions in the Field and the Struggle of Memory. Truthout, May 31. Retrieved from
  36. Rosello, Johanes. 2013. Guess Who’s Leading Georgia’s Latino Boom? Las Mujeres. News Taco, October 28. Retrieved from
  37. Smooth, Wendy G. 2006. Intersectionality in electoral politics: A mess worth making. Politics & Gender 2: 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vidal, Mirta. 1971. Chicanas Speak Out, Women: New Voice of La Raza. New York: Pathfinder Press. Retrieved from
  39. Vargas, Arturo. 2013. Re: The Latina Strategy. Message to the author. June 14. E-mail.Google Scholar
  40. Wrinkle, Robert D. 1991. Understanding Intra-Ethnic Attitude Variations: Mexican Origin Population Views of Immigration. Social Science Quarterly 72: 379–387.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina E. Bejarano
    • 1
  • Valerie Martinez-Ebers
    • 2
  1. 1.University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations