Microfinance for Entrepreneurial Development: Study of Women’s Group Enterprise Development in India



Microfinance programmes worldwide are considered as one of the most effective tools to fight against poverty through financial and social inclusion. A wide range of studies acknowledges that microfinance is a successful mechanism to reach microentrepreneurs at the bottom of the pyramid, particularly women who are more vulnerable to many of the socio-economic, political, cultural, and environmental shocks and risks. Therefore, building their livelihood in a more sustainable way will help themselves as well as their household. In this context, we explore the role played by MFI in enterprise development and finance as well as its impact on income and employment of female entrepreneurs in rural India. The analysis draws on a case study of SKDRDP, one of the largest non-governmental (not-for-profit) MFI based in India. Specifically, to understand the outcomes of microfinance and enterprise intervention, in-depth interviews with female members of self-help groups promoted by SKDRDP-SIRI microenterprise units were carried out. The finding suggests that SKDRDP’s microfinance innovations through group enterprises with an ‘integrated approach’ have contributed in improving employment and income of female entrepreneurs in rural areas.


Microfinance Microenterprise Self-help groups Women and India 

JEL Classification

G21 O12 O16 R23 J16 


  1. Besley, T. (1994). How do market failures justify interventions in rural credit markets? The World Bank Research Observer, 9(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besley, T., & Coate, S. (1995). Group lending, repayment incentives and social collateral. Journal of Development Economics, 46(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. D’Espallier‚ B.‚ Guérin‚ I.‚ & Mersland‚ R. (2011). Women and repayment in microfinance: A global analysis. World Development, 39(5), 758–772.Google Scholar
  4. Dunford, C. (2006). Evidence of microfinance’s contribution to achieving the millennium development goals. Retrieved July 26, 2007, from
  5. Ghatak, M. (1999). Group lending, local information and peer selection. Journal of Development Economics, 60(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Giriappa, S. (1987). BeediRooling in rural development. New Delhi: Daya Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Hossain, M. (1988). Credit for alleviation of rural poverty: The grameen bank of Bangladesh (Institute Research Rep. No. 65, February). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research.Google Scholar
  8. Khandker, S. R. (2003). Micro-finance and poverty: Evidence using panel data from Bangladesh (World bank policy research paper 2945). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Littlefield, E., Morduch, J., & Hashemi, S. (2003). Is microfinance an effective strategy to reach the millennium development goals? CGAP Occasional (Paper No. 24). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Morduch, J. (1999). The Microfinance Promise. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1569–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. NABARD. (2015). Status of Microfinance in India-2015–16. National Bank for Agriculture And Rural Development‚ Head Office‚ Mumbai.Google Scholar
  12. Sen, A. (1984). Rights and capabilities. In A. Sen (Ed.). Resources, values and development (pp. 307–324). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Stiglitz, J. E. (1990). Peer monitoring and credit markets. World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  15. Varian, H. (1990). Monitoring agents with other agents. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 146(1), 153–174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Bank ManagementPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations