Advertisement

The Influence of Formal and Informal Institutions on Microcredit: Financial Inclusion for Micro-Entrepreneurs by Lender Type

Chapter
  • 578 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter applies the Helmke–Levitsky typology of informal institutions to discuss how the interaction between the formal and informal institutional environment has shaped the development of China’s microfinance industry. The chapter shows that formal regulatory framework influenced commercial ‘for-profit’ microfinance providers (village and township banks or ‘VTBs’) and public interest microfinance providers (microcredit companies or ‘MCCs’) in different ways. While MCCs suffer deficiencies of not being able to accept savings deposits, VTBs are restricted by the inability to charge higher risk-adjusted interest rates. Geographical separation and low levels of out-group trust constrain the development of microfinance organisations, especially when the organisations do not have strong ties to local communities This study was approved by the appropriate university ethics committee and subsequently performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All persons gave their informed consent prior to inclusion in the study. Details disclosing the identity of the subjects under study have been omitted. The authors have full control of the primary data and have no financial relationship or conflict of interest with the organisations involved in the research.

Keywords

Financial inclusion Helmke–Levitsky framework Institutional theory Microenterprise Microfinance Poverty alleviation 

Abbreviations

CBRC

China Banking Regulatory Commission

MCC

Microcredit Company

NGO

Non-governmental Organisation

PBOC

People’s Bank of China

RMB

Renminbi

VTB

Village and Township Bank

References

  1. Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Yeh, K. S. (2008). Private firms in China: Building legitimacy in an emerging economy. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argandoña, A. (2010). Microfinance. In J. R. Boatright (Ed.), Finance ethics: Critical issues in theory and practice (pp. 419–434). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Barboza, G., & Trejos, S. (2009). Micro credit in chiapas, Mexico: Poverty reduction through group lending. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrids: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1419–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Honohan, P. (2009). Access to financial services: Measurement, impact, and policies. The World Bank Research Observer, 24(1), 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boatright, J. R. (2010). Ethics in Finance. In J. R. Boatright (Ed.), Finance ethics: Critical issues in theory and practice (pp. 1–19). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boisot, M. H., & Child, J. (1988). The iron law of fiefs: Bureaucratic failure and the problem of governance in the Chinese economic reforms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 507–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boisot, M. H., & Child, J. (1996). From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 600–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brislin, R. (1993). Understanding culture’s influence on behavior. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Britta, A., & Fouillet, C. (2010). Profit empowerment: The microfinance institution’s mission drift. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 9(3–4), 327–355.Google Scholar
  11. Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruton, G. D., Khavul, S., & Chavez, H. (2011). Microlending in emerging economies: Building a new line of inquiry from the ground up. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 718–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cerny, S., & Tou, J. (2010). Microfinance: The untapped Chinese market. China Briefing: Magazine and Daily News Service. Retrieved from http://www.china-briefing.com/news/2010/05/13/the-untapped-chinese-market.html.
  16. Chakrabarty, S., & Bass, A. E. (2014). Institutionalizing ethics in institutional voids: Building positive ethical strength to serve women microfinance borrowers in negative contexts. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(4), 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Child, J. (1994). Management in China during the age of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Chiu, T. (2014). Putting responsible finance to work for Citi microfinance. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(2), 219–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowton, C. (2010). Banking. In J. R. Boatright (Ed.), Finance ethics: Critical issues in theory and practice (pp. 325–337). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Cull, R., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance meets the market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  24. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estrin, S., & Prevezer, M. (2011). The role of informal institutions in corporate governance: Brazil, Russia, India, and China compared. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 28(1), 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. He, G., Du, X., Bai, C., & Li, Z. (2009). China microfinance industry assessment report. China Association of Microfinance. Retrieved from http://en.chinamfi.net/portal/PortalHome.asp.
  28. Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2007). The empirics of microfinance. What do we know? The Economic Journal, 117(517), F1–F10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Mehrteab, H. T. (2005). Peer monitoring, social ties and moral hazard in group lending programmes: Evidence from Eritrea. World Development, 33(1), 149–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hudon, M. (2008). Norms and values of the various MFIs. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(1–2), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hudon, M. (2009). Should access to credit be a right? Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hulme, D., & Mosley, P. (1996). Finance against poverty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Ito, S. (2003). Microfinance and social capital: Does social capital help create good practice? Development in Practice, 13(4), 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khavul, S. (2010). Microfinancing: Creating opportunities for the poor? Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(3), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khavul, S., Chavez, H., & Bruton, G. D. (2013). When institutional change outruns the change agent: The contested terrain of entrepreneurial microfinance for those in poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, T. W. (1999). Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mendoza, R., & Thelen, N. (2008). Innovations to make markets more inclusive for the poor. Development Policy Review, 26(4), 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meyer, K. E. (2001). Institutions, transaction costs, and entry mode choice in Eastern Europe. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Park, A., & Ren, C. (2001). Microfinance with Chinese characteristics. World Development, 29(1), 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peng, M. W. (2000). Business strategies in transition economies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275–296.Google Scholar
  48. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528.Google Scholar
  49. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y. L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Roodman, D. (2012). Due diligence: An impertinent inquiry into microfinance. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  51. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt, R. H. (2010). Microfinance, commercialization and ethics. Poverty & Public Policy, 2(1), 99–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. See, G. (2009). Harmonious society and Chinese CSR: Is there really a link? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sparreboom, P., & Duflos, E. (2012). Financial inclusion in the People’s Republic of China: An analysis of existing research and public data. A Joint Publication of CGAP and the Working Group on Inclusive Finance in China: China Papers on Inclusiveness No. 7. Retrieved from http://www.microfinanceforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/WMFG-China-Overview_v7-electronic_hr.pdf.
  56. Spencer, S., & Wood, A. (2005). Making the financial sector work for the poor. Journal of Development Studies, 41(4), 657–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tan, J. (2009). Institutional structure and firm social performance in transitional economies: Evidence of multinational corporations in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tavanti, M. (2013). Before microfinance: The social value of microsavings in Vincentian poverty reduction. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(4), 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2011). Entrepreneurship in emerging markets: Strategies for new venture creation in uncertain institutional contexts. Management International Review, 51(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsai, K. S. (2002). Back-alley banking: Private entrepreneurs in China. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tsai, K. S. (2004). Imperfect substitutes: The local political economy of informal finance and microfinance in rural China and India. World Development, 32(9), 1487–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Turvey, C. G., & Kong, R. (2010). Informal lending amongst friends and relatives: Can microcredit compete in rural China? China Economic Review, 21(4), 544–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Woller, G., Dunford, C., & Woodworth, W. (1999). Where to microfinance? International Journal of Economic Development, 1(1), 29–64.Google Scholar
  64. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R., & Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wu, E., & Yuan, X. (2013). Emerging risks on China’s path towards financial inclusion—A joint publication of PlaNet Finance and CreditSuisse. Retrieved from http://www.microfinancegateway.org/p/site/m/template.rc/1.9.61842/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Economics, Finance and Entrepreneurship Group, Aston Business SchoolBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Richard J. Wehle School of BusinessCanisius CollegeBuffaloUSA
  4. 4.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations