Skip to main content

Dental Impactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract

The normal human dentition comprises two sets of teeth which gradually emerge or erupt into the oral cavity; the first set comprises 20 primary or deciduous teeth and the second set which gradually replace the deciduous teeth comprise 32 permanent teeth. The teeth are equally divided among the maxilla and the mandible and between sides.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Açikgöz A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, Otan F (2006) Characteristics and prevalence of non syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Algerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G (2011) Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary ca-nines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 33:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alqerban A, Jacobs R, van Keirsbilck PJ, Aly M, Swinnen S, Fieuws S, Willems G (2014a) The effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction and its impact on the ortho-dontic treatment outcome. J Orthod Sci 3:34–40

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alqerban A, Willems G, Bernaerts C, Vangastel J, Politis C, Jacobs R (2014b) Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT. Eur J Orthod 36:698–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (2012) Parameters of care: clinical practice guidelines for oral and maxillofacial surgery (AAAOMS ParCar 2012). J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:61–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer WH (1975) Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 5th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 311

    Google Scholar 

  • Auyong GT, Le A (2011) Dentoalveolar nerve injury. Oral Maxillofac Clin North Am 23:395–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker A (2012) Orthodontic treatment of impacted teeth, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi SD, Roccuzzo M (1991) Primary impaction of primary teeth: a review and report of three cases. J Clin Pediatr Dent 15:165–168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho RW, Egito Vasconcelos BC (2011) Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2714–2721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaushu S, Becker T, Becker A (2014) Impacted central incisors: factors affecting prognosis and treatment duration. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaushu S, Kaczor-Urbanowicz K, Zadurska M, Becker A (2015) Predisposing factors for severe incisor root resorption associated with impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curran AE, Damm DD, Drummond JF (2002) Pathologically significant pericoronal lesions in adults: histopathologic evaluation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:613–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dalessandri D, Migliorati M, Rubiano R, Visconti L, Contardo L, Di Lenarda R, Martin C (2013) Reliability of a novel CBCT-based 3D classification system for maxillary canine impactions in orthodontics: the KPG index. Sci World J 2013:921234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalessandri D, Migliorati M, Visconti L, Contardo L, Kau CH, Martin C (2014) KPG index versus OPG measurements: a comparison between 3D and 2D methods in predicting treatment duration and difficulty level for patients with impacted maxillary canines. Biomed Res Int 2014:537620

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Doğramaci EJ, Sherriff M, Rossi-Fedele G, McDonald F (2015) Location and severity of root resorption related to impacted maxillary canines: a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) evaluation. Aust Orthod J 31:49–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson S, Kurol J (2000) Incisor resorptions due to ectopic maxillary canines imaged by computerized tomography: a comparative study in extracted teeth. Angle. Orthodontist 70:276–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ericson S, Bjerklin K, Falahat B (2002) Does the canine dental follicle cause resorption of permanent incisor roots? A computed tomographic study of erupting maxillary canines. Angle Orthod 72:95–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flygare L, Ohman A (2008) Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 12:291–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaeminia H, Gerlach NL, Hoppenreijs TJ, Kicken M, Dings JP, Borstlap WA, de Haan T, Bergé SJ, Meijer GJ, Maal TJ (2015) Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43(10):2158–2167. pii: S1010-5182(15)00340-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero ME, Shahbazian M, Elsiena Bekkering G, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K (2011) The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 38:208–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero ME, Botetano R, Beltran J, Horner K, Jacobs R (2014) Can preoperative imaging help to predict postoperative outcome after wisdom tooth removal? A randomized controlled trial using panoramic radiography versus cone-beam CT. Clin Oral Investig 18:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, Huang JC (2010) Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 137:590–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haug RH, Perrott DH, Gonzalez ML, Talwar RM (2005) The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons age-related third molar study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1106–1114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GJ, Rue TC (2006) Third-molar extraction as a risk factor for temporomandibular disorder. J Am Dent Assoc 137:1547–1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang GJ, Cunha-Cruz J, Rothen M, Spiekerman C, Drangsholt M, Anderson L, Roset GA (2014) A prospective study of clinical outcomes related to third molar removal or retention. Am J Public Health 104:728–234

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jung YH, Liang H, Benson BW, Flint DJ, Cho BH (2012) The assessment of impacted maxillary canine position with panoramic radiography and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:356–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kau CH, Pan P, Gallerano RL, English JD (2009) A novel 3D classification system for canine impactions—the KPG index. Int J Med Robot 5:291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komerik N, Muglali M, Tas B, Selcuk U (2014) Difficulty of impacted mandibular third molar tooth removal: predictive ability of senior surgeons and residents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 72:1062.e1–1062.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai CS, Bornstein MM, Mock L, Heuberger BM, Dietrich T, Katsaros C (2013) Impacted maxillary canines and root resorptions of neighbouring teeth: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Orthod 35:529–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lim AA, Wong CW, Allen JC Jr (2012) Maxillary third molar: patterns of impaction and their relation to oroantral perforation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1035–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, YT W, Ma XC (2008) Localization of impacted maxillary ca-nines and observation of adjacent incisor resorption with cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maegawa H, Sano K, Kitagawa Y, Ogasawara T, Miyauchi K, Sekine J, Inokuchi T (2003) Pre-operative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96:639–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matzen LH, Wenzel A (2015) Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review—based on a hierarchical model of evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 44:20140189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JA, Brudon WL (2001) Dentitional development. In: Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Needham Press, Ann Arbor, pp 31–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Mupparapu M (2002) Patterns of intraosseous transmigration and ectopic eruption of mandibular canines: review of literature and report of nine additional cases. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neves FS, Souza TC, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ, Bóscolo FN (2012) Correlation of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT findings in the assessment of the relationship between impacted mandibular third molars and the mandibular canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 41:553–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida I, Oda M, Tanaka T, Kito S, Seta Y, Yada N, Fujita Y, Saeki K, Morikawa K, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Wakasugi-Sato N, Habu M, Kodama M, Miyamoto I, Kokuryo S, Nishimura S, Matsuo K, Tominaga K, Yoshioka I, Maki K, Morimoto Y (2015) Detection and imaging characteristics of the gubernacular tract in children on cone beam and multidetector computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 120:e109–e117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nortjé CJ, Farman AG, Grotepass FW (1977) Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental (mandibular) canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 15:55–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oda M, Miyamoto I, Nishida I, Tanaka T, Kito S, Seta Y, Yada N, Saeki K, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Wakasugi-Sato N, Habu M, Kodama M, Kokuryo S, Nishimura S, Matsuo K, Tominaga K, Yoshioka I, Maki K, Morimoto Y (2016) A spatial association between odontomas and the gubernaculum tracts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 121:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pederson GW (1988) Surgical removal of tooth. In: Pederson GW (ed) Oral surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pell GJ, Gregory BT (1933) Impacted mandibular third molars: classification and modified techniques for removal. Dent Dig 39:330–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M, Short BE (1993) An investigation into the response of palatally displaced canines to the removal of deciduous canines and an assessment of factors contributing to favourable eruption. Br J Orthod 20:215–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajab LD, Hamdan MA (2002) Supernumerary teeth: review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 12:244–254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rood JP, Shehab BA (1990) The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva Santos LM, Bastos LC, Oliveira-Santos C, da Silva SJ, Neves FS, Campos PS (2014) Cone-beam computed tomography findings of impacted upper canines. Imaging Sci Dent 44:287–292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stivaros N, Mandall NA (2000) Radiographic factors affecting the management of impacted upper permanent canines. J Orthod 27:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ventä I (2012) How often do asymptomatic, disease-free third molars need to be removed? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:S41–S47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winter GB (1926) Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted third molar. American Medical Books, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Wriedt S, Jaklin J, Al-Nawas B, Wehrbein H (2012) Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop 73:28–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dania Tamimi B.D.S., D.M.Sc. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tamimi, D., Warvarovsky, B., Lawson, S., Scarfe, W.C., Angelopoulos, C. (2018). Dental Impactions. In: Scarfe, W., Angelopoulos, C. (eds) Maxillofacial Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62061-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62061-9_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62059-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62061-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics