Advertisement

Splenic Injuries

  • Giuseppe D’Amico
  • Diletta Cozzi
  • Giovanni Battista Verrone
  • Gloria Addeo
  • Ginevra Danti
  • Vittorio Miele
Chapter

Abstract

The spleen is the most commonly injured organ involved in blunt trauma, and the diagnosis of splenic injury may be difficult. The clinical presentation includes left upper quadrant pain or referred pain to the left shoulder. Laboratory test results (e.g., hematocrit) do not always reflect the degree of splenic injury. However, because the spleen is the most vascular organ of the body, peritoneal bleeding from splenic injury can be potentially life-threatening. Ultrasonography (US) and Computed Tomography (CT) have a key role in the management of blunt splenic trauma. US is used first in hemodynamically stable patients with minor trauma, because how quick, noninvasive and easy it is to perform. US is also performed in unstable patient with the aim to detect the presence of hemoperitoneum.

CT is the gold standard for patient evaluation after blunt injury and for the detection and staging of splenic lesions. CT helps in differentiation of patients with active splenic bleeding (which could indicate a need for surgery) from patients with stable non-bleeding injuries, who are candidates for conservative management. Although splenectomy was considered the treatment of choice in the past, non-operative management of blunt splenic trauma is currently the standard of care in patients who are hemodynamically stable. Recently, to increase the number of patients managed non-operatively, splenic artery embolization has been adopted when there is CT evidence of active bleeding. Hemodynamically unstable patients or those with failed nonsurgical management require surgery.

Keywords

Abdominal trauma Spleen injury Computed tomography CEUS Management Splenic embolization Splenectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Rhee P, Joseph B, Pandit V, et al. Increasing trauma deaths in the United States. Ann Surg. 2014;260:13–21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poletti PA, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K, Takada T, Killeen KL, Perlmutter D, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma patients: can organ injury be excluded without performing computed tomography? J Trauma. 2004;57:1072–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miele V, Errante Y, Galluzzo M, Pieri S, Sessa B, Trinci M. La diagnostica per immagini nelle lesioni traumatiche della milza. Il Giornale Italiano di Radiologia Medica. 2015;2:230–48. doi: 10.17376/girm_2-2-03042015-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Olthof DC, Van der Vlies CH, Gosling JC. Evidence-based management and controversies in blunt splenic trauma. Curr Trauma Rep. 2017;3:32–7. doi: 10.1007/s40719-017-0074-2; Epub 2017 Feb 9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forsythe RM, Harbrecht BG, Peitzman AB. Blunt splenic trauma. Scand J Surg. 2006;95:146–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beuran M, Gheju I, Venter MD, et al. Non-operative management of splenic trauma. J Med Life. 2012;22:47–58; Epub: 2012 Mar 5.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu HM, Kortbeek JB. Management of splenic pseudocysts following trauma: a retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 2006;191:631–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singer G, Rieder S, Eberl R, et al. Comparison of two treatment eras sonographic long-term outcome of blunt splenic injuries in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2013;172:1187–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clancy AA, Tiruta C, Ashman D, et al. The song remains the same although the instruments are changing: complications following selective non-operative management of blunt spleen trauma: a retrospective review of patients at a level I trauma center from 1996 to 2007. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2012;6:4. doi: 10.1186/1752-2897-6-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovic GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma. 1995;38:323–4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199503000-00001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raikhlin A, Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Myers A. Imaging and transcatheter arterial embolization for traumatic splenic injuries: review of the literature. Can J Surg. 2008;51:464–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mirvis SE, Whiteley NO, Gens DR. Blunt splenic trauma in adults: CT-based classification and correlation with prognosis and treatment. Radiology. 1989;171:27–32. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.1.2928544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saksobhavivat N, Shanmuganathan K, Chen HH, et al. Blunt splenic injury: use of a multidetector CT-based splenic injury grading system and clinical parameters for triage of patients at admission. Radiology. 2015;274:702–11. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14141060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marmery H, Shanmuganathan K, Alexander MT, Mirvis SE. Optimization of selection for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: comparison of MDCT grading systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1421–7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoffmann L, Pierce D, Puumala S. Clinical predictors of injuries not identified by focused abdominal sonogram for trauma examinations. J Emerg Med. 2009;36:271–9. doi: 10.1016/j.Jemermed.2007.09.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miele V, Di Giampietro I, Iannello S, et al. Diagnostic imaging in paediatric polytrauma management. Radiol Med. 2015;120:33–49. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0469-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGrahan JP, Richards J, Gillen M. The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan pearls and pitfalls. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21:789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sessa B, Trinci M, Iannello S, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection and staging of abdominal traumatic lesions compared to US and CE-MDCT. Radiol Med. 2015;120:180–9. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0425-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Valentino M, Serra C, Zironi G, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: emergency contrast-enhanced sonography for detection of solid organ injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1361–7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menichini G, Sessa B, Trinci M, et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the identification and characterization of traumatic solid organ lesions in children: a retrospective comparison with baseline-US and CE-MDCT. Radiol Med. 2015;120:989–1001. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0535-z; Epub 2015 Mar 31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miele V, Piccolo CL, Galluzzo M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in blunt abdominal trauma. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150823. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150823.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Deganello A, et al. Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric practice: an EFSUMB position statement. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:33–43. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110394.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Raso MM, Siani A. Real-time, contrast enhanced sonography: a new tool for detective active bleeding. J Trauma. 2005;59:933–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anderson SW, Varghese JC, Lucey BC, et al. Blunt splenic trauma: delayed phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury. Radiology. 2007;243:88–95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2431060376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hassan R, Abd Aziz A, Md Ralib AR, Saat A. Computed tomography of blunt spleen injury: a pictorial review. Malays J Med Sci. 2011;18:60–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Uyeda JW, LeBedis CA, Penn DR, et al. Active hemorrhage and vascular injuries in splenic trauma: utility of the arterial phase in multi-detector CT. Radiology. 2014;270:99–106. doi: 10.1148/radiol13121242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marmery H, Shanmuganathan K. Multidetector-row computed tomography imaging of splenic trauma. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2006;27:404–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Federle MP, Jeffrey RB. Hemoperitoneum studied by computed tomography. Radiology. 1983;148:187–92. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.1.6856833.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pinto F, Miele V, Scaglione M, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: advantages and limitations. Acta Radiol. 2014;55:776–84. doi: 10.1177/0284185113505517; Epub 2013 Sep 23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pinto F, Valentino M, Romanini L, et al. The role of CEUS in the assessment of the hemodynamically stable patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Radiol Med. 2015;120:3–11. doi: 10.1007/s11547-014-0455-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gordic S, Alkadhi H, Simmen HP, Wanner G, Cadosh D. Characterization of indeterminate spleen lesions in primary CT after blunt abdominal trauma: potential role of MRI imaging. Emerg Radiol. 2014;21:491–8. doi: 10.1007/s10140-014-1227-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Mukundan G, et al. MR imaging of the spleen: spectrum of abnormalities. Radiographics. 2005;25:967–82. doi: 10.1148/rg254045154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robertson F, Leander P, Ekberg O. Radiology of the spleen. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:80–95. doi: 10.1007/s003300000528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Miele V, Piccolo CL, Sessa B, et al. Comparison between MRI and CEUS in the follow up of patients with blunt abdominal trauma managed conservatively. Radiol Med. 2016;121:27–37. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0578-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Capasso L, Cuomo UM, D’Ambrosio R. Treatment of splenic trauma in paediatric age [article in Italian]. Ann Ital Chir. 2008;79:129–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Corsi A, et al. Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review. Crit Care. 2013;17:R185. doi: 10.1186/cc12868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rosito M, Lattarulo S, Pezzolla A, et al. The conservative treatment in the splenic trauma [article in Italian]. Ann Ital Chir. 2009;80:231–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sheybany EF, Gonzales-Araiza G, Kousari YM, et al. Pediatric non-accidental abdominal trauma. Radiographics. 2014;34:139–53. doi: 10.1148/rg.341135013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Madoff DC, Denys A, Wallace MJ, et al. Splenic arterial interventions: anatomy, indications, technical considerations and potential complications. Radiographics. 2005;25:S191–211. doi: 10.1148/rg.25si055504.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tinkoff G, Esposito TJ, Reed J, et al. American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver and kidney validation based on the national trauma data bank. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(5):646–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.06.342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tartari S, Montalto C, Ferrante Z, et al. Trauma chiuso addominale: indicazioni al trattamento interventistico. Il Giornale Italiano di Radiologia Medica. 2016;3:953–8. doi: 10.17376/girm_3-6-11122016-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Franco F, Monaco D, Volpi A, Marcato C, Larini P, Rossi C. The role of arterial embolization in blunt splenic injury. Radiol Med. 2011;116:454–65. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0624-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schnuriger B, Inaba K, Konstantinidis A, et al. Outcomes of a proximal versus distal splenic artery embolization after trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma. 2011;70:252–60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318f2a92e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gaarder C, Dormagen JB, Eken T, et al. Nonoperative management of splenic injuries: improved results with angioembolization. J Trauma. 2006;61:192–8. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000223466.62589.d9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hagiwara A, Fukushima H, Murata A, et al. Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatether arterial embolization in patients with a transient response to fluid resuscitation. Radiology. 2005;235:57–64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351031132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Miller PR, Chang MC, Hoth JJ, et al. Prospective trial of angiography and embolization for all grade III to V blunt splenic injuries: non-operative management success rate is significantly improved. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:644–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.040.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Van der Cruyssen F, Manzelli A. Splenic artery embolization: technically feasible but not necessarily advantageous. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:47. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0100-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Farsad K, Ahuja C, Chadha M. An overview of splenic embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:720–5. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14637.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Frandon J, Rodière M, Arvieux C, et al. Blunt splenic injury: outcomes of proximal versus distal and combined splenic artery embolization. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2014;95:825–31. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2014.03.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ekeh AP, Khalaf S, Ilyas S, et al. Complication arising from splenic artery embolization: a review of a 11-year experience. Am J Surg. 2013;205:250–4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cooney R, Ku J, Cherry R, et al. Limitations of splenic angioembolization in treating blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2005;59:926–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe D’Amico
    • 1
  • Diletta Cozzi
    • 1
  • Giovanni Battista Verrone
    • 1
  • Gloria Addeo
    • 1
  • Ginevra Danti
    • 1
  • Vittorio Miele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyCareggi University HospitalFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations