Advertisement

Constructing Subjects and Comparison in International Relations Studies

  • Thomas Lindemann
Chapter
Part of the The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy book series (SPIRP)

Abstract

The purpose of this contribution is to steer between the idiographic and nomothetic poles, and to present in action the method of structured, focalized and controlled comparisons that are liable to produce “contextualized” “intermediary” theories. I will outline the explanative potential of “chrono-logics” and specific contexts. The emphasis will at first be put on the merits and limits of “particularistic” conceptions of social phenomena, then on underlining the advantages and problems of “covering law,” an ambition of the dominant approaches. Finally, I will demonstrate the focalized and controlled comparison method and will show how it provides a way of analyzing international crises between times of war and peace without misrecognizing the particularity of “cases.”

Bibliography

  1. Allison, Graham. 1971. Essence of Decision. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, Peter, and Philip Potter. 2015. War and Democratic Constraint. How the Public Influences Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Devin, Guillaume. 2013. Sociologie des relations internationales. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  4. Elman, Colin, and Miriam Elman, eds. 2001. Bridges and Boundaries: Historian, Political Scientists and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. George, Alexander, and George Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goodin, Robert, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann, eds. 1996. A New Handbook of Political Science, 10–23. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Levy, Jack S., and John A. Vasquez. 2014. The Outbreak of the First World War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindemann, Thomas, and Maéva Clément. 2015. Introduction. Les politiques de prévention des guerres dans les crises internationales. Dynamiques internationales, 10 (September). Available at www.dynamiques-internationales.com/
  10. Lindemann, Thomas. 2011. Causes of War. The Struggle for Recognition. Colchester: ECPR.Google Scholar
  11. Loewener, Franca. 2015. Unnegotiable Interests. The Moroccan Crisis of 1905. Dynamiques internationales 10 (September). Available at www.dynamiques-internationales.com/
  12. Lustick, Ian. 1996. History, Historiography, and Political Science. American Political Science Review 90 (3): 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vennesson, Pascal. 1997. Les Chevaliers de l’air. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Lindemann
    • 1
  1. 1.École Polytechique, University Versailles Saint QuentinVersaillesFrance

Personalised recommendations