Pavement Modification Using Enzymatic Lime

  • Greeshma Nizy EujineEmail author
  • S. Chandrakaran
  • N. Sankar
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)


Soil samples containing different clay fractions were subjected to lime stabilization, enzyme stabilization and enzymatic lime stabilizations in the laboratory. Unconfined Compressive Strength Tests were conducted to determine the optimum dosages of stabilizing agents. California Bearing Ratio Tests were then performed on samples stabilized with optimum dosages of lime, enzyme, and enzymatic lime respectively. These stabilized samples were tested at different periods of curing and showed that enzymatic lime stabilized soils delivered comparatively higher strengths. Based on the results of CBR tests, the modified thickness of flexible pavement is also discussed.


  1. Bell, F.G.: Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng. Geol. 42, 223–237 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergado, D.T., Anderson, L.R., Miura, N., Balasubramaniam, A.S.: Soft Ground Improvement in Lowland and Other Environments. ASCE Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann, R.: Soil Stabilizer on Universally Accessible Trials. United States Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration (2000)Google Scholar
  4. BIS.: Determination of Unconfined Compressive Strength, IS 2720 (Part 10): 1991 (1991)Google Scholar
  5. BIS.: Laboratory Determination of CBR, IS 2720 (Part 16): 1987 (1987)Google Scholar
  6. Cao, L., et al.: Flocculations of organisms with clay. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Biotechnology, Tianjin, China on October 18–19, 2012, 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. Che Mamat, R.B.: Engineering properties of Batu Pahat soft clay stabilized with lime, cement, and bentonite for subgrade in road construction. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (2013)Google Scholar
  8. Choudalakis, G., Gotsis, A.D.: Permeability of polymer/clay nanocomposites: a review. Eur. Polym. J. 45(4), 967–984 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, G.M.. The Central Role of Enzymes as Biological Catalysts. The Cell: A Molecular Approach, (National Library of Medicine) (2000).
  10. Eren, Ş., Filiz, M.: Comparing the conventional soil stabilization methods to the consolid system used as an alternative admixture matter in Isparta Daridere material. Constr. Build. Mater. 23(7), 2473–2480 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eujine, G.N., Sankar, N., Chandrakaran, S.: The engineering behaviour of enzymatic lime stabilised soils. Ground Improv. (2016). doi: 10.1680/jgrim.16.00014 Google Scholar
  12. IRC.: IRC-37-2001: Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements, 37 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. Isaac, K.P., Biju, P.B., Veeraragavan, A.: Soil stabilization using bio-enzymes for rural roads. In: Proceedings of the Conference by the Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, December 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Kassim, K.A.: Consolidation characteristics of lime stabilised soil. J. Civ. Eng. 12(1), 31–42 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. Khalid, N., et al.: The California bearing ratio (CBR) value for banting soft soil subgrade stabilized using lime-pofa mixtures. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 19A, 155–163 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. Little, D.N.: Handbook for Stabilization of Pavement Subgrades and Base Courses with Lime. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque (1995)Google Scholar
  17. Modarres, A., Nosoudy, Y.M.: Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime—technical and environmental impacts. Appl. Clay Sci. 116–117, 281–288 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Najmiah, N., Razap, B.A.: Effect of Lime on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Soft Soils. B.E. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (2007)Google Scholar
  19. NLA.: Lime-Treated Soil Construction Manual Lime Stabilization & Lime Modification. National Lime Association (2004)Google Scholar
  20. Pfeiffer, J.: Enzymes, the Physics and Chemistry of Life, pp. 171–173. Simon and Schuster, New York (1954)Google Scholar
  21. Pinck, L.A.: Adsorption of proteins, enzymes, and antibiotics by montmorillonite. Clays Clay Miner. 9(1), 520–529 (1960).
  22. Ragassi, V.: Compressed Earth Block—Manual of Production. Manual of Production: Stabilization, 1 (1995)Google Scholar
  23. Rogers, C.D., Glendinning, S.: Improvement of clay soils in situ using lime piles in the UK. Eng. Geol. 47(3), 243–257 (1997).
  24. Rubens, B., Sheldon, R.M.: Objective Performance Measurement of Actual Road Sites Treated with an Organic Stabilizer. Nature Plus (2002)Google Scholar
  25. Sahu, B.K.: Improvement in California Bearing Ratio of Various Soils in Botswana by Fly Ash. International Ash Utilization Symposium, pp. 22–24 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. Shankar, A.U.R., Rai, H.K., Mithanthaya, R.I.: Bio-enzyme stabilised laterite soil as a highway material. J. Indian Roads Congress 553, 143–151 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. Sherwood, P.: Soil stabilization with cement and lime. State of the art review. Tech. Rep. Transport Research Laboratory; HMSO, London (1993)Google Scholar
  28. Shirsavkar, S., Koranne, S.: Innovation in road construction using natural polymer. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 15, 1614–1624 (2010).
  29. Shukla, M., Bose, S., Sikdar, P.: Bio-enzyme for stabilization of soil in road construction a cost-effective approach. IRC Seminar: Integrated Development of Rural and Arterial Road Networks, (December), pp. 1–14 (2003).
  30. Tingle, J., et al.: Stabilization mechanisms of nontraditional additives. Transp. Res. Rec. 1989(1), 59–67 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tran, T.D., Cui, Y.J., Tang, A.M., Audiguier, M., Cojean, R.: Effects of lime treatment on the microstructure and hydraulic conductivity of Héricourt clay. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 6(5), 399–404 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2014.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trivedi, J.S., Nair, S., Iyyunni, C.: Optimum utilization of fly ash for stabilization of subgrade soil using genetic algorithm. Procedia Eng. 51, 250–258 (2013). doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.01.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vedula, M., Nath, P., Chandrashekar, B.P.: A Critical Review of Innovative Rural Road Construction Techniques and Their Impacts. National Rural Roads Development Agency, New Delhi (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greeshma Nizy Eujine
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Chandrakaran
    • 1
  • N. Sankar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyCalicutIndia

Personalised recommendations