Skip to main content

Acquisition of Knowledge in the Form of Fuzzy Rules for Cases Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Mining and Big Data (DMBD 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10387))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider an approach to automatic knowledge acquisition through machine learning based on integration of two basic paradigms of reasoning – case-based and rule-based reasoning. Case-based reasoning allows to use high-performance database technology for storing and accumulating cases, while rule-based reasoning is the most developed technology for creating declarative knowledge on the basis of strong logical inference. We also propose an improvement of classification algorithm through extraction of fuzzy rules from cases. We have obtained higher classification accuracy for various membership functions and for sequentially reducing amount of training sample by application of special strategies for expanding the scope of fuzzy rules in the control sample classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Erlbau, New York (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Schank, R.C.: Dynamic Memory: A Theory of Reminding and Learning in Computers and People. Cambridge University Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simpson, R.L.: A computer model of case-based reasoning in problem solving: an investigation in the domain of dispute mediation. Technical report GIT-ICS-85/18, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Information and Computer Science (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammond, K.J.: CHEF: a model of case-based planning. In: American Association for Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1986, Philadelphia, PA (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sycara, E.P.: Resolving adversarial conflicts: an approach to integrating case-based and analytic method. Technical report GIT-ICS-87/26, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Information and Computer Science (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koton, P.: Using experience in learning and problem solving. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute Technology, Laboratory of Computer Science (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinrichs, T.R.: Problem Solving in Open Worlds. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Watson, I., Marir, F.: Case-based reasoning: a review. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 9(4), 327–354 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marling, C., Sqalli, M., Rissland, E., Hector, M.A., Aha, D.: Case-based reasoning integrations. AI Mag. 23(1), 69–86 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang, H.L., Wang, C.S.: Two stages of case-based reasoning - integrating genetic algorithm with data mining mechanism. Expert Syst. Appl. 35, 262–272 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rissland, E.L., Skala, D.B.: Combining case-based and rule-based reasoning: a heuristic approach. In: Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1989, Detroit, pp. 524–530 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dutta, S., Bonissone, P.P.: Integrating case- and rule-based reasoning. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 8(3), 163–203 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Mach. Learn. 1, 81–106 (1986). Kluwer Academic Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  15. Xiong, N.: Learning fuzzy rules for similarity assessment in case-based reasoning. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 10780–10786 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiong, N.: Fuzzy rule-based similarity model enables learning from small case bases. Appl. Soft Comput. 13, 2057–2064 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Avdeenko, T.V., Makarova, E.S.: Integration of case-based and rule-based reasoning through fuzzy inference in decision support systems. Procedia Comput. Sci. 103, 447–453 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The reported study was funded by Russian Ministry of Education and Science, according to the research project No. 2.2327.2017/4.6

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Avdeenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Avdeenko, T., Makarova, E. (2017). Acquisition of Knowledge in the Form of Fuzzy Rules for Cases Classification. In: Tan, Y., Takagi, H., Shi, Y. (eds) Data Mining and Big Data. DMBD 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61845-6_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61845-6_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61844-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61845-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics