Language, Language Planning, and U.S. Public Policy

  • Jacob S. Siegel
Chapter

Abstract

Some linguists hold to the view that language evolves essentially through natural processes with little group intervention, but this is hardly true and public intervention plays a major role in this process. The development of a language is really an interplay between the natural creative acts of the users and the more deliberate interventions of society and its more public spokespersons. Society intervenes in the formation of a language both when the government passes laws relating to language use and programs and when a public institution, a government agency, or a public figure codifies the vocabulary, spelling, and pronunciation of the language in dictionaries, or selects and employs common school texts in its school system. This is public policy and planning at work on the language. Public policy and planning with respect to language form and use refers then to government sponsorship and support of the use of a language in a specific form, as expressed in law, statements by government officials, or government financial support. A language is official when a specific law or government edict so designates it and it is used exclusively, along with any other official language, as the language of the government and its publications, and the public is not required to recognize any other language (s).

References and Suggested Readings

Public Influences on Language Development

  1. Algeo, J., & Butcher, C. A. (2014). The origins and development of the English language (7th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  2. Barreto, A. A. (2007). Vacillating education and language policies in Puerto Rico. In K. Schuster & D. Witkosky (Eds.), Language of the land (pp. 3–24). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Baynham, M. (2011). Migration. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 413–428). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. British Broadcasting Company (BBC). (2013, March 5). Azerbaijan may ban Russian names. News.Google Scholar
  5. British Broadcasting Company (BBC). (2016, March 23). China plans restrictions on ‘foreign’ place names. News. Google Scholar
  6. Crystal, D. (Ed.). (2003). Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dillard, J. L. (1992). A history of American English. New York: Longman Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Lerer, S. (2008). The history of the English language (Second Edition. Part II ed.). Chantilly: The Teaching Company.Google Scholar
  9. Pei, M. (1962). The story of English: A modern approach. Chapter 8, English and the language of the state, p. 89 ff. Premier.Google Scholar
  10. Ruiz, B. (1988). Orientations in language planning. In S. L. McKay & S.-L. Wong (Eds.), Language diversity: Problem or resource? Boston: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
  11. Santos, F., & New York Times. (2008, July 23). Mayor orders New York City to expand language help. New York Times.Google Scholar
  12. U. S. Census Bureau/McGovern. P.D. (2004). A quality assessment of data collected in the American Community Survey for households with low English proficiency.Google Scholar
  13. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). The 2010 census language program assessment report. 2010 Census Planning Memoranda Series. No 204.Google Scholar
  14. U.S. Census Bureau, Griffin, D., & Broadwater, J. (2005). American Community Survey non-interview rates due to language barriers. Paper presented at the meetings of the Census Advisory Committee on the African-American Population, the American Indian and Alaska Native Population, the Asian Population, and the Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander Populations on April 25–27, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. Winchester, S. (1998). The professor and the madman: A tale of murder, insanity, and the making of the Oxford English dictionary. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Wikipedia. (2014). “Oxford English Dictionary.” Article accessed on internet on June 25, 2014.Google Scholar

Language and Immigration Policies and Linguistic Diversity

  1. Bean, F. D., & Stevens, G. (2003). Rose series in sociology. America’s newcomers and the dynamics of diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Borjas, G. (1999). Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bouvier, L. (1991). Peaceful invasions: Immigration and changing America. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  4. Blommaert, J., Leppänen, S., Pahta, P., & Räisänen, T. (Eds.). (2012). Dangerous multilingualism: Northern perspectives on order, purity, and normality, Language and globalization series. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  5. Crawford, J. (2000). At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  6. Dávila, A. (Ed.). (2014). On Latin@s and the immigration debate. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 146–159.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, R./Wall Street Journal. (1996, April). Despite his heritage, prominent economist backs immigration cut. The Wall Street Journal, 26, 1996.Google Scholar
  8. Duquêne, A., & Pavlenko, A. (Organizers.) (2013, March 16–19). The dark side of linguistic diversity? Session at the 2013 Annual Meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  9. Foner, N., & Simon, P. (Eds.). (2015). Fear. Anxiety, and national identity: Immigration and belonging in North America and Western Europe. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Huntington, S. P. (2004). Who are we: The challenges to America’s national identity. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Papademetriou, D. G. (2013, March–April). The fundamentals of immigration reform. The American Prospect, 17–24.Google Scholar
  12. Papademetriou, D. G. (2016, March 30–April 2). Europe must take control of the migration crisis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Pennycook, A. (2013, March 16–19). The ethical challenge of diversity. Paper presented at the 2013 annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Dallas.Google Scholar
  14. Plotkin-Amrami, G. (2008). From Russianness to Israeliness through the landscape of the soul: Therapeutic discourse in the practice of immigrant absorption of ‘Russian’ adolescents. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Accessed on internet at Researchgate.net, publication 245535264, on July 2, 2016.
  15. Population Europe. (2015). Population and policy compact. Policy Brief No. 09.Google Scholar
  16. Potowski, K. (2010a). Language diversity in the United States: Dispelling common myths and appreciating advantages. Chapter 1. In K. Potowski (Ed.), Language diversity in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Potowski, K. (Ed.). (2010b). Linguistic diversity in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schmidt, R., Sr. (2000). Language policy and identity politics in the United States. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Spolsky, B. (2005). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Yinger, J. P. (1994). Ethnicity: Source of strength? Source of conflict? Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar

Bilingual Education and Teaching in Ebonics

  1. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, C. (2001). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (3rd ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, Ltd..Google Scholar
  3. Baron, D. (1997, January 24). Hooked on ebonics. The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B4–B5.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. (2015). Private communication of Randee Baron with the author on November 22, 2015, regarding English-language-learners education in schools of Sunny Isles Beach, Fl.Google Scholar
  5. Crawford, J. (1999). Bilingual education: History, politics, theory and practice. Los Angeles: Bilingual Educational Services.Google Scholar
  6. Evans, B. A., & Hornberger, N. H. (2005). No child left behind: Repealing and unpeeling federal language educational policy in the United States. Language Policy, 4, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frum, D. (2000). How we got here. The ‘70s. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Gersten, R., & Baker, S. (2000). What we know about effective instructional practices for English-language learners. Exceptional Children, 66(4), 454–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geyer, G. A. (1999, August 26). Excellence through immersion. Washington Times, p. A13.Google Scholar
  10. Hochschild, J. L., & Scovronick.N.B. (2003). The American dream and the public schools. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hochschild, J. L., & Shen, F. X. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and education policy. In Oxford Handbook of Racial and Ethnic Politics in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. International Handbook of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. (1988). Ref. P115.158.Google Scholar
  13. Kloss, H. (1998). The American bilingual tradition. Rowley: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  14. Lyster, R., Collins, L., & Ballinger, S. (2009). Linking languages through a bilingual read-aloud project. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 366–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyster, R. (2013). The effects of biliteracy instruction on morphological awareness. Fall 2013 Lecture Series, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Parrish, T., Perez, M., Merickel, A., & Linquanti, R. (2006). Effects of the Implementation of Proposition 227 on the Education of English Learners, K-12, Findings from a 5-Year Evaluation: Final Report. Washington, DC: AIR, and San Francisco: WestEd.Google Scholar
  17. Schulthies, B. (2014, April). The language of instruction or the instruction of language? Reviving official language debates in Morocco. Anthropology News, 55(4).Google Scholar
  18. Smith, E. (1997). What is black English? What is ebonics? In T. Perry & L. Delpit (Eds.), The real ebonics debate: Power, language and the education of African-American children (pp. 49–58). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Washington Post. (2001, September 9). Editorial. Teach English.Google Scholar
  20. Woodson, K. C. (2015). Private internet communication, Nov. 10, 2015 regarding the English- language-learners education program in the public schools of Montgomery County, MD.Google Scholar
  21. Yule, G. (1985). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge Uiversity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Yzaguirre, R. (1998). What’s wrong with bilingual education? Is it ‘lingual’ or is it education?’. Education Week, 72, 46–47.Google Scholar

Voting Rights

  1. US Government Accountability Office. (1997, May 9). GAO/GGD-97-81.Google Scholar

Official English and English Only

  1. American Civil Liberties Union. (2000, September 8). The Rights of Immigrants. ACLU Position Paper.Google Scholar
  2. Nunberg, G. (1986, December 28). Resolution: English Only, Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
  3. Schildkraut, D. (2001). Official English and the states: Influences on declaring English as the official language in the United States. Political Research Quarterly, 54(2), 445–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Language Resources

  1. Eurostat. (2015). Data for 2012: Foreign languages learned per pupil. Eurostat: European Union. Accessed on internet on April 15, 2016.Google Scholar
  2. Eurostat. (2016). Foreign language learning statistics—Statistics explained. Eurostat: European Union. Accessed on internet on April 15, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. Feal, R. G. (2011, Spring). “Language study and higher education in a changing world. Can America lead without learning other languages?” The Key Reporter (The Phi Beta Kappa Newsletter), p. 8.Google Scholar
  4. Pew Research Center/Devlin, K. (2015). Learning a foreign language a ‘must” in Europe, not so in America (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. www.PewResearch/.org/author/kldevlin/Google Scholar
  5. Simon, J.R., & Ainsworth, J.W. (2012). Race and socioeconomic status differences in study abroad participation: The role of habitus, social networks, and cultural capital. ISRN Education. Article ID 413896.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob S. Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.North BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations