Some Sociolinguistic Characteritics of Premodern Societies and Modern Indigenous Societies

  • Jacob S. Siegel
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I examine another special group of language communities. They are characterized by a technological culture that is wholly or largely premodern. They vary widely in time and place and their degree of modernity. A few of these groups have writing systems, but most do not, even though they currently may exist as viable communities amidst established national populations. Some are prehistoric, extinct-language communities. While all the communities considered here have premodern cultures, some have survived to present times as indigenous societies but in a different form than during their earlier past. Among the surviving groups, some are indigenous peoples who have been militarily overwhelmed by a colonial power, and have been so isolated that they have maintained much, if not all, of their traditional cultures in spite of the developments in the surrounding world.

References and Suggested Readings

  1. Acsádi, G., & Nemeskéri, J. (1970). The history of human life span and mortality. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiádo.Google Scholar
  2. Bellwood, P. (2013). First migrants: Ancient migration in global perspective. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bouchaerkt, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., et al. (2011). Mapping the origins and expansion of the indo-European language family. Science, 337(6097), 957–960.Google Scholar
  4. Cabana, G. S., & Clark, J. J. (2011). Rethinking anthropological perspectives on migration. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron, C. M. (2013). How people moved among ancient societies: Broadening the view. American Anthropologist, 115(2), 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Díaz-Polanco, H. (1998). Cambios en la consideración de la populación indígena y su autonomía. Demos, 34–35.Google Scholar
  7. Faudree, P. (2013). Singing for the dead: The politics of indigenous revival in Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finkel, M. (2013, June). First Australians. National Geographic, 223(6), 60–83.Google Scholar
  9. Güldemann, T., & Stoneking, M. (2008, October). A historical appraisal of clicks: A linguistic and genetic population perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 37, 93(109).Google Scholar
  10. Gutiérrez Nájera, L. (2014). Beyond national origins: Latin@ American indigenous migration. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 153–154.Google Scholar
  11. Hackenbeck, S. (2014). Book review of Peter Bellwood, first migrants: Ancient migration in global perspective. American Anthropologist, 116(2), 437–438.Google Scholar
  12. Harkness, N. (2013). Songs of Seoul: An ethnography of voice and voicing in Christian South Korea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, J. B., Clark, J. J., Doelle, W. H., & Lyons, P. D. (2004). Prehistoric demography in the southwest: Migration, coalescence, and Hobokam population decline. American Antiquity, 69(4), 689–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Holmes, R. (2013, September 2). How many uncontacted tribes are left in the world? Washington Post, 219(2932), 6.Google Scholar
  15. Hornborg, A. (2014). Political economy, ethnogenesis, and language dispersals in the prehistoric Andes: A world system perspective. American Anthropologist, 116(4), 810–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humes, K. R., Jones, N. A., Ramirez, R. R./ U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Overview of race and Hispanic origin. 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. (C2010BR-02).Google Scholar
  17. Knight, A., Underhill, P. A., Mortensen, H. M., Zhivotovsky, L. A., et al. (2003, March 18). African Y chromosome and mtDNA divergence provides insight into the history of the click languages. Current Biology, 13, 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ladefoged P. (1999). Decline in the world’s languages. Living on earth, February 12, 1999, interview by L. Knoy for PRI, Environmental News Magazine.Google Scholar
  19. Laverchery, H. (1936). Easter Island, Polynesia. Antiquity 10(37), March. Republished in the Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, 1936, pp. 391–396.Google Scholar
  20. Muehlmann, S. (2013). Where the river ends: Contested indigeneity in the Mexico Colorado Delta. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ortman, S. G., & Cameron, C. M. (2011). A framework for controlled comparisons of ancient southwestern movement. In M. Nelson & C. Strawhacker (Eds.), Movement, connectivity, and landscape change in the ancient southwest (pp. 233–252). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  22. Pennizi, E. (2004, February 27). “The first language?” The evolution of language. Science, 303, 1319–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renfrew, C. (1987). Archeology and language: The puzzle of indo-European origins. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  24. Sanjuk, R. (2003). Rethinking migration: Ancient to future. Global Networks, 3, 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Séguy, I., Buchet, L., contributions from Caussinus, H., & Courgeau, D. (2013). Handbook of paleodemography, INED Population Studies 2. New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Statistics Canada. (2006). Census of Canada, 2006. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Vaillant, G.C. (1937). History and stratigraphy in the valley of Mexico. Scientific Monthly 44 (April). Published originally in the Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution, 1936, pp. 521–530.Google Scholar
  28. Villagran, L. (2013). A ‘like’ for linguistics: Can social media save Mexico’s unwritten languages? Christian Science Monitor, April 1, 2013.Google Scholar
  29. Webb, R. E., & Rindos, D. J. (1997). Mode and tempo of the initial colonization of empty landmasses: Sahul and the Americas compared. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 7, 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob S. Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.North BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations