Demographic and Socioeconomic Differences in Linguistic Behavior

  • Jacob S. Siegel
Chapter

Abstract

Many of the categories of different demographic and socioeconomic groups—age/sex groups, race/ethnic groups, socioeconomic classes, marital and household types, and social networks--differ from one another in their linguistic behavior and characteristics, as do the inhabitants of different geographic areas and particular populations over time. The former variations are described as social variations, as distinguished from geographic variations in space and variations in time. Demographic and socioeconomic variables and linguistic variables may be associated with one another. A linguistic variable is a linguistic measure that has recognizable variants, such as proficiency in English (very good, good, etc.), literacy (yes or no), language spoken at home (e.g., Japanese, Italian, French, etc.), and degree of coherence in speech (Wardhaugh 1992). Linguistic differences between the categories of the social groups may be expressed also in any of the different structural features of a language, i.e., its phonology, vocabulary, or syntax. In this chapter I identify and describe the principal social variations in language that distinguish the leading categories of demographic and socioeconomic groups.

References and Suggested Readings

General

  1. Paolillo, J. C. (2006). Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford: CSLI Press.Google Scholar
  2. Tagliamonte, S. (2006). Analyzing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Wardhaugh, R. (1992). An introduction to sociolinguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar

Gender Differences

  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2012). Living language: An introduction to linguistic ant hropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. (Chapter 9).Google Scholar
  2. Baugh, J. (2000). Beyond Ebonics: Linguistic pride and racial prejudice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baxton, J. (2011). Gender. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 331–343). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Carli, L. L. (1989). Gender differences in intervention style and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(4), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiswick, B., & Miller, P. W. (1994). Language and labor supply: The role of gender among immigrants in Australia. Research on Economic Inequality, 17, 153–189.Google Scholar
  6. Coates, J. (1993). Women, men and language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Deuchar, M. (1990). A pragmatic account of women’s use of standard language. In J. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex (pp. 27–32). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  8. Eckert, P. (1989). The whole woman: Sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1, 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Communities of practice: Where language gender, and power all live. In K. Hall, M. Buchholtz, & B. Moonwomon (Eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference (pp. 89–99). Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  10. Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social change in the course of linguistic change. Linguistic Variation and Change, 2, 205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Women’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  12. Moosmüller, S. (1987–1988). Soziale Perzeption der Grundfrequenz und des Tonhöhenverlaufs bei Frauern and Männern. In Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenshaft (Vol. 13-14, pp. 411–432).Google Scholar
  13. Tannen, D. (2012). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  14. Trudgill, P. (1972a). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Trudgill, P. (1972b). Norwich study. Accessed on internet on 2 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
  16. Wodak, R. (1981). Women relate; men report: Sex differences in language behavior in a therapeutic group. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 281–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wodak, R., & Benke, G. (1997). Gender as a sociolinguistic variable: New perspectives on variation studies. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of linguistics (pp. 127–188). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Zentella, A. C. (1987). Language and female identity in the Puerto Rican community. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in transition (pp. 167–179). New York: New York Press.Google Scholar

Age Differences

  1. Alladi, S., Bak, T., Duggirala, V., Surampudi, B., et al. (2013). Bilingualism delays age of onset of dementia, independent of education and immigration status. Neurology. Accessed on internet on 26 Nov 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Freedman M). (2007). Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45, 459–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., & Ryan, J. (2006). Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism. J, of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12(6), 1341–1354.Google Scholar
  4. Bialystok, E., Craik, F., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 290–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second-language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56(S1), 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burke, D. M., & Shafto, M. A. (2004). Aging and language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 21–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busacco, D. (1999). Normal communication changes in older adults.” Let’s talk: For people with special communication needs. January/February 1999.Google Scholar
  8. Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2008). A test of the critical period hypothesis for language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 29(1), 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Bot, K. (2009). Multilingualism and aging. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhattia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. de Bot, K., & Clyne, M. (1989). Language reversion revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Bot, K., & Clyne, M. (1994). A 16-year longitudinal study of language attrition of Dutch immigrants in Australia. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 12–28.Google Scholar
  12. de Bot, K., & Makoni, S. (2005). Language and aging in multilingual societies: A dynamic approach. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  13. de Bot, K., & van der Hoeven, N. (2011). Language and ageing. In J. Simpson (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 124–137). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Emery, O. B. (1998). Linguistic decrement in normal aging. Language & Communication, 6(1/2), 47–64.Google Scholar
  15. Gerontological Society of America. (2012). Communicating with older Americans: An evidence-based view of what really works. Washington, DC: Gerontological Society of America.Google Scholar
  16. Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1992). A comparison of changes in macrolinguistic and microlinguistic aspects of discourse production in normal aging. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 47(4), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hakuta, K. (1987). Degree of bilingualism and cognitive ability in mainland Puerto Rican children. Child Development, 58, 1372–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hakuta, K. (1989). Bilingualism and intelligence testing: An annotated bibliography. BRG working papers 89–08, Bilingual Research Group. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  19. Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton, H. (Ed.). (1999). Language and communication in old age: Multidisciplinary perspectives. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  21. Hooper, C. R., & Cralidis, A. (2009). Normal changes in the speech of older adults. You’ve still got what it takes, it just takes a little longer! Perspectives on Gerontology, 14(2), 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnston, J. (2005). Factors that influence language development. Article under Language Development and Literacy. In Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. Google Scholar
  23. Kavé, G., Eyal, N., Shorek, A., & Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2008). Multilingualism and cognitive state in the oldest-old. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keijzer, M. (2007). Last in. First out. An investigation of the regression hypothesis of Dutch emigration to Anglophone Canada. PhD. dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  25. Kemper, S., Greiner, L., Marquis, J., Prenovost, K., & Mitener, T. (2001a). Language decline across the life span: Findings from the nun study. Psychology and Aging, 16, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kemper, S., Thompson, M., & Marquis, J. (2001b). Longitudinal change in language production: Effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content. Psychology and Aging, 16(4), 600–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kemper, S., Vandeputte, D., Rice, K., Cheung, H., & Gubarchuk, J. (1995). Speech adjustments to aging during a referential communication task. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo, L & Warren, J. R. (2014). Describing and explaining age, period, and cohort trends in Americans’ vocabulary knowledge. Accessed on Internet, 25 May 2014. Originally presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, MA, April 30—May 2, 2014.Google Scholar
  29. Mutchler, J. E., & Braillier, S. (1999). English language proficiency among older Hispanics in the United States. Gerontologist, 39, 310–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newport, E. L. (2002). Critical periods in language development. In I. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 737–740). London: MacMillan Publishing Ltd (Nature Publishing Group).Google Scholar
  31. Obler, L. K. (2016). Language changes in healthy aging. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, April 26–28, 2016, Nottingham, Great Britain. Accessed on internet 10 Sept 2016.Google Scholar
  32. Obler, L. K., Albert, M. L., Spiro, A., III, Goral, M., et al. (2011). Language changes associated with aging. In M. L. Albert & J. Knoefel (Eds.), Clinical neurology of aging (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ryan, E., Kennaley, D., Pratt, M., & Shumovich, M. (2000). Evaluation by staff, residents, and community seniors of patronizing speech in the nursing home: Impact of passive, assertive, or humorous responses. Psychology and Aging, 15, 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saling, L. L., Woodstock, K., & Saling, M. M. (2015). Discourse compression of elderly adults in a diadic context. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(2), 258–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Savundranayagam, M. Y., & Ryan, E. B. (2008). Social psychological aspects of communication and aging. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schaie, K. W. (1996). Intellectual development in adulthood: The Seattle longitudinal study. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Shafto, M. A., James, L.E., Abrams, L. Tyler, L. K, & Cam-CAN. (2017). Age-related increases in verbal knowledge are not associated with wordfinding problems in the Cam-CAN cohort: What you know won’t hurt you, Journals of Gerontology, Series B, Psychological and Social Sciences, 72(1), 100–106. Special Issue: Cognitive Aging.Google Scholar
  38. Siegel, D. J. (2013). Brainstorm: The power and purpose of the teenage brain. New York: Tarcher/Penguin.Google Scholar
  39. Siegel, J. S. (2012). The demography and epidemiology of human health and aging. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Snowden, D. (2003). Healthy aging and dementia: Findings from the nun study Annals of Internal Medicine, 139(5, Part 2), 450–454.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, J. A., & Gove, W. R. (1999). The intercohort decline in verbal ability: Does it exist? American Sociological Review, 64(2), 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang, Y. C., & Land, K. C. (2008). A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys—Fixed or random effects? Sociological Methods and Research, 36(3), 297–326.Google Scholar
  43. Yule, G. (2014). The study of language (5th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

White/Black Differences

  1. Bailey, G. (1991). Directions of change in Texas English. Journal of American Culture, 14, 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Pattillo-McCoy, M. (1999). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Smith, E. (1997a). What is black English, what is Ebonics? In T. Perry & L. Delpit (Eds.), The real Ebonics debate: Power, language and the education of African American children (pp. 49–58). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Smith E. (1997b). Ebonics: A serious analysis of African American speech patterns. MATT News. Vol. 2, Edition II, Jan. 1997. L.H. Clegg, Editor and Publisher. Accessed on internet on 20 July 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Tagliamonte, S., & Poplack, S. (1988). How black English past got to the present. Language in Society, 17, 513–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Toliver-Weddington, G. (1979). Ebonics (Black English): Implications for Education. Journal of Black Studies 9(4) [special issue].Google Scholar
  7. Walters, K. (2016). Dialects. Handbook of Texas Online. Texas Historical Association. Accessed on internet on 5 Sept 2016. http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/pcd01.

Socioeconomic/Class Differences

  1. Fiske, S. T., & Markus, H. R. (Eds.). (2012). Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Labov, W. (1963). The social modification of a sound change. Word, 19, 273–309. Reprinted in W. Labov, Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  3. Labov, W. (1966a). The social stratification of English in New York City (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Labov, W. (1966b). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in sound change. In W. Bright (Ed.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 88–101). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  5. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  6. Williams, J. C. (2012). The class culture gap. In S. T. Fiske & H. R. Markus (Eds.), Facing social class: How societal rank influences interaction (pp. 39–58). New York: Russell Sage, 2012.Google Scholar

Social Networks

  1. Bergs, A. (2006). Analyzing online communication from a social network point of view: questions, problems, perspectives. Language @Internet, 3, article 3.Google Scholar
  2. Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. H. (2007, July 26). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 1370–1379. www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa066082Google Scholar
  3. Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  4. Eckert, P. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fagyal, Z., Swarup, S, Escobar, A.M., Gasser, L., & Lakkaraju, K. (2010). Centers, Peripheries, and Popularity: The Emergence of Norms in Simulated Networks of Linguistic Influence. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(2): Article 10.Google Scholar
  6. Labov, W. (1989). The exact description of the speech community: Short a in Philadelphia. In R. Fasold & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Language change and variation (pp. 1–57). Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  7. Lareau, A. (2011). Unequal childhoods: Race, class, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lippi-Green, R. L. (1989). Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural Alpine village. Language in Society, 18, 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Milroy, J. (1981). Regional accents in English, Belfast. Belfast: Blackstaff.Google Scholar
  10. Milroy, L. (1987). Language and social networks (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Milroy, J. (1992). Linguistic variation and change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1978). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In P. Trudgill (Ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English (pp. 19–36). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  13. Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21, 21–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacob S. Siegel
    • 1
  1. 1.North BethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations